It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ZombieJesus
reply to post by SpittinTruth
It's hotter today, than it was about a week ago. Matter of fact...it seems like my thermometer is stuck on 65 degrees.
I know you are fairly new here, but this has been covered time and time again.
The weather at ground level in no way, NO WAY reflects the weather at 30,000ft. +
Originally posted by WiseThinker
Is the whole contrail vs chemtrail is but a distraction to the actual spraying of chemicals, keeping the movement from getting anywhere. im not denying the OP at all, im just not impressed with how its presented as a "Challange"
Is the whole contrail vs chemtrail is but a distraction to the actual spraying of chemicals, keeping the movement from getting anywhere
Lets be clear, i am in no way calling you a dis info agent, nor am i calling you a shill or troll, nor have i denied the stupidity of a part of the chemtrail movement (nor am i involved in that movement).
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by WiseThinker
Is the whole contrail vs chemtrail is but a distraction to the actual spraying of chemicals, keeping the movement from getting anywhere. im not denying the OP at all, im just not impressed with how its presented as a "Challange"
The problem is that the persistence of chemtrails vs. contrails is about 95% of the evidence for the theory that chemicals are being sprayed.
Take that away (as the Popular Science Article does), and what are you left with? Some aluminum in rainwater from dust, and "it sounds like something they would do".
So really I think that "contrails vs. chemtrails" directly addresses the heart of the matter. The promoters have no real evidence, so they desperately try to ignore this one issue.
I'll put it like this: PROOF is in the PUDDING! It's blatantly ADMITTED that chemicals ARE being used.
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by SpittinTruth
I'll put it like this: PROOF is in the PUDDING! It's blatantly ADMITTED that chemicals ARE being used.
Any links to this info,and what chemicals are they using?
Originally posted by SpittinTruth
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by WiseThinker
Is the whole contrail vs chemtrail is but a distraction to the actual spraying of chemicals, keeping the movement from getting anywhere. im not denying the OP at all, im just not impressed with how its presented as a "Challange"
The problem is that the persistence of chemtrails vs. contrails is about 95% of the evidence for the theory that chemicals are being sprayed.
Take that away (as the Popular Science Article does), and what are you left with? Some aluminum in rainwater from dust, and "it sounds like something they would do".
So really I think that "contrails vs. chemtrails" directly addresses the heart of the matter. The promoters have no real evidence, so they desperately try to ignore this one issue.
I'll put it like this: PROOF is in the PUDDING! It's blatantly ADMITTED that chemicals ARE being used. Why you people keep saying they're NOT spraying, is beyond me? Either YOUR lying...or these so called "scientists" are giving us false information. It can't be both ways.
BTW, you do know chemicals were sprayed during the Vietnam War, right? Next topic....PLEASE!
BTW, you do know chemicals were sprayed during the Vietnam War, right
Chemical weaponsIn 1961 and 62 the Kennedy administration authorized the use of chemical weapons to destroy vegetation and food crops in South Vietnam. Between 1961 and 1967 the US Air Force sprayed 12 million US gallons of concentrated herbicides, mainly Agent Orange (a dioxin) over 6 million acres (24,000 km²) of foliage, trees and food crops, affecting an estimated 13% of South Vietnam's land. In 1965, 42% of the herbicide used was allocated to food crops. The herbicide use was also intended to drive civilians into RVN-controlled areas.[2]
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by SpittinTruth
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by WiseThinker
Is the whole contrail vs chemtrail is but a distraction to the actual spraying of chemicals, keeping the movement from getting anywhere. im not denying the OP at all, im just not impressed with how its presented as a "Challange"
The problem is that the persistence of chemtrails vs. contrails is about 95% of the evidence for the theory that chemicals are being sprayed.
Take that away (as the Popular Science Article does), and what are you left with? Some aluminum in rainwater from dust, and "it sounds like something they would do".
So really I think that "contrails vs. chemtrails" directly addresses the heart of the matter. The promoters have no real evidence, so they desperately try to ignore this one issue.
I'll put it like this: PROOF is in the PUDDING! It's blatantly ADMITTED that chemicals ARE being used. Why you people keep saying they're NOT spraying, is beyond me? Either YOUR lying...or these so called "scientists" are giving us false information. It can't be both ways.
BTW, you do know chemicals were sprayed during the Vietnam War, right? Next topic....PLEASE!
In Vietnam, defoliants were sprayed from low level to clear the forest cover, and clouds were seeded for rain to try to degrade ground conditions. But nobody denies this. In the US pesticide is sprayed over urban areas from low flying planes, and clouds are seeded to increase rain. Again, nobody denies this.
But none of this looks anything like what people are calling chemtrails. None of this is secret. What people refer to as chemtrails is a secret high altitude spraying program that leaves long spreading white lines in the sky. That's what people deny. That's what the chemtrail promoters have no evidence of. That's what looks just like the contrails as described in the 1969 Popular Science article.
I'm glad you ASSUME i'm "new" here. Don't let my few posts fool you. i've been on ATS for about 6 years now. Whatever you think you're gonna say....i've heard it all....a million times over. I'm familiar with the chemtrail debunkers...like Unicus and Proudbird. So, save your breath...and save ATS space on their servers.
Originally posted by SpittinTruth
Enough with your "Popular Science" article crap! You act like that's the BIBLE. The same people that work for Rolling Stone, work for Popular Science. Why you people take these magazines like they're gospel, is beyond me????
It's blatantly ADMITTED that chemicals ARE being used.
Dow Chemical Co. and Monsanto Co., the two largest makers of the chemical named after the color of its containers, were among the more than 20 firms named in the suit, the official said.
Originally posted by ZombieJesus
reply to post by SpittinTruth
It's blatantly ADMITTED that chemicals ARE being used.
What chemicals and by who?
Surely a 6 year ATS veteran who has heard every single aspect of the "chemtrail" theory 1 million times, and knows what everyone is going to say before they even think it, would have no problem citing a source
For such a debunker.....it looks like you got caught, with your pants down!
Originally posted by SpittinTruth
Enough with your "Popular Science" article crap! You act like that's the BIBLE. The same people that work for Rolling Stone, work for Popular Science. Why you people take these magazines like they're gospel, is beyond me???? But then, you want to say the BIBLE is just fictional. Maaaaaaaan, only God's creation could be so stupid.
DENY IGNORANCE???? Yeah....uhm, hmmm When does that happen? Lately, it seems like IGNORANT is the thing to be!