It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Cosmic Deception

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2004 @ 05:40 AM
link   
COSMIC DECEPTION: LET THE CITIZEN BEWARE

by Steven M. Greer M.D.
Director, The Disclosure Project


Imagine this. It is the summer of 2001, and someone presents you with a script for a movie or book that tells how a diabolical terrorist plot unfolds wherein both 110 story World Trade Center towers and part of the Pentagon are destroyed by commercial jets hijacked and flown into those structures.

Of course you would laugh, and if you were a movie mogul or book editor, reject it out of hand as ridiculous and implausible, even for a fictional novel or movie. After all, how could a commercial jet, being tracked on radar after two jets had already hit the World Trade towers, make it through our air defenses, into the most sensitive airspace in the world, and in broad daylight on a crystal clear day, slam into the Pentagon! And this in a country that spends over $1 billion a day to defend itself! Absurd, illogical - nobody would swallow it!

Unfortunately, there are some of us who have seen these scripts - and of far worse things to come - and we are not laughing.

One of the few silver linings to these recent tragedies is that maybe - just maybe - people will take seriously, however far-fetched it may seem at first, the prospect that a shadowy, para-governmental and transnational entity exists that has kept UFOs secret - and is planning a deception and tragedy that will dwarf the events of 9/11.


More at: www.disclosureproject.org...



[edit on 7-10-2004 by John bull 1]



posted on Oct, 7 2004 @ 05:55 AM
link   
Would never work 50% of poeple dont even belive in ETS or ufos.
And 100% of the people know what are tek is capabl of.
Becides even to thous who mite belive an attack by et happened would still have trouble beliving after the fact .
Look at it like this assuming we reversed enginered ETS ride and made our own then us it to attack our selfs in order to scare people .
how to you think they could plan on defeating the ETS wile only using F16 ? Because if you just use our et craft to destroy the fakes then it kind gives it away that its a manfuctured event .
and theres no way F16 could down a ufo .



posted on Oct, 7 2004 @ 06:20 AM
link   
aelphaeis_mangarae

Based upon what you know from those that have given you insight, what sort of time frame are we looking at before this begins to becomes a awareness to the world?



posted on Oct, 8 2004 @ 10:43 PM
link   
2006/2007 Nuclear attack which they will blame on terrrosts.

2010 - Meteorites

2012 - Extra terrestrial threat.



posted on Oct, 8 2004 @ 10:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by aelphaeis_mangarae
2006/2007 Nuclear attack which they will blame on terrrosts.

2010 - Meteorites

2012 - Extra terrestrial threat.


Well there definitely is a cover up, but dont know about them being a super threat.



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 06:28 AM
link   


and theres no way F16 could down a ufo .


how do you know this?

ever tried to bring down a ufo with an f16?

[edit on 9-10-2004 by optimus fett]



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 06:35 AM
link   
the UFO is too fast for any missile,bullet or plane



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 07:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by DarkSide
the UFO is too fast for any missile,bullet or plane


We do not have proof on this. They could be slow, they could be using teleportation. They could not exist. Everything is possible. We have evidence, but we dont have proof. So, if you make such statements, i demand backup on this as hard proof or get used to use "in my opinion".



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 09:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by beer

Originally posted by DarkSide
the UFO is too fast for any missile,bullet or plane


We do not have proof on this. They could be slow, they could be using teleportation. They could not exist. Everything is possible. We have evidence, but we dont have proof. So, if you make such statements, i demand backup on this as hard proof or get used to use "in my opinion".


UFO's have been detected at speeds in excess of Mach 200. The most typical characteristic of the UFO is the sudden accelerations and deaccelerations, which if attempted by an F16, the G forces(50-10,000+) would crush it. Hence, the original statement is quite correct.

This is why only laser weapons are the only projectile weapons that can offer some resistance to UFO's.


[edit on 9-10-2004 by Indigo_Child]



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 09:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by aelphaeis_mangarae
2006/2007 Nuclear attack which they will blame on terrrosts.

2010 - Meteorites

2012 - Extra terrestrial threat.


It would be really exciting, shocking and terrifying, if they uses an ET threat to set-up the NWO. Perhaps, this is what the bible called the "Great deception"

Yes, I think the next terrorist attack is going to be a nuclear, chemical or biological one.

[edit on 9-10-2004 by Indigo_Child]



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 09:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Indigo_Child
UFO's have been detected at speeds in excess of Mach 200. The most typical characteristic of the UFO is the sudden accelerations and deaccelerations, which if attempted by an F16, the G forces(50+) would crush it. Hence, the original statement is quite correct.


Once again provide a link to backup your claims, anyone can straight talk themselves on a forum board.



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 09:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Indigo_Child

Originally posted by beer

Originally posted by DarkSide
the UFO is too fast for any missile,bullet or plane


We do not have proof on this. They could be slow, they could be using teleportation. They could not exist. Everything is possible. We have evidence, but we dont have proof. So, if you make such statements, i demand backup on this as hard proof or get used to use "in my opinion".


UFO's have been detected at speeds in excess of Mach 200. The most typical characteristic of the UFO is the sudden accelerations and deaccelerations, which if attempted by an F16, the G forces(50+) would crush it. Hence, the original statement is quite correct.

This is why only laser weapons are the only projectile weapons that can offer some resistance to UFO's.



Who ever said we have to use jets to down them, we can always use or ground defenses. If they do attack in the next 10 years or so , by that time we will have laser defenses which can knock out a artillery round at super sonic speeds why can't it hit a UFO?




posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 10:07 AM
link   


This is why only laser weapons are the only projectile weapons that can offer some resistance to UFO's.


Don't mean to nit-pick, but a Laser is not a projectile weapon. A gun is a projectile weapon, as it fires a projectile..a laser would be a directed energy weapon (or some other fancy techno-lingo)



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 10:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by Linux

Originally posted by Indigo_Child
UFO's have been detected at speeds in excess of Mach 200. The most typical characteristic of the UFO is the sudden accelerations and deaccelerations, which if attempted by an F16, the G forces(50+) would crush it. Hence, the original statement is quite correct.


Once again provide a link to backup your claims, anyone can straight talk themselves on a forum board.


I do not need to prove myself. This information is readily available online, so I suggest you research it in your own time. However, I will make an exception here, and provide you a link: www.ufoevidence.org...

The UFO's speed before accelerating into space is 87,000 kph (Mach 73)
- Three seconds after the light flash, the UFO changes direction sharply and accelarates off into space at 340,000 kph (Mach 285) within 2.2 seconds
- Such an acceleration would produce 14,000 g of force (1g is normal Earth gravity)


There are more prosaic explanations for this video(space debris, ice particles) but there are prosaic explanations for everything extraordinary . A successfull explanation is one that explains all the data and events, or simply put: an explanation that explains.

For instance, skeptics accept the weather balloon explanation for Roswell. When, the weather balloon explanation is at odds with the actual data and events.

Then there is the "the goverment says, NASA says" which is not an explanation, but an appeal to credibility. As the government is suspected of being complicit with UFO/ET, the official explanation cannot be taken at face value.

[edit on 9-10-2004 by Indigo_Child]



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 10:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by SpockO_o

Originally posted by Indigo_Child

Originally posted by beer

Originally posted by DarkSide
the UFO is too fast for any missile,bullet or plane


We do not have proof on this. They could be slow, they could be using teleportation. They could not exist. Everything is possible. We have evidence, but we dont have proof. So, if you make such statements, i demand backup on this as hard proof or get used to use "in my opinion".


UFO's have been detected at speeds in excess of Mach 200. The most typical characteristic of the UFO is the sudden accelerations and deaccelerations, which if attempted by an F16, the G forces(50+) would crush it. Hence, the original statement is quite correct.

This is why only laser weapons are the only projectile weapons that can offer some resistance to UFO's.



Who ever said we have to use jets to down them, we can always use or ground defenses. If they do attack in the next 10 years or so , by that time we will have laser defenses which can knock out a artillery round at super sonic speeds why can't it hit a UFO?



Exactly. We already have laser defenses, at least ground based and air-based. It may even be possible to down a UFO with some sort of gravity distorition or EMP weapons.



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 10:30 AM
link   
I agree that using conventional fighter-jet aircraft and their missiles are not the most efficient methods of defense. Lasers, particile beams, and related energy-based weaponry is the wisest approach.

Zetan probes have been reported to be spherically shaped, cylindrically shaped and saucer shaped. Logically, we would have to face these before engagng their large interstellar battleships.

Can Zetan spacecraft be damaged and destroyed?

Absolutely.

Warships Shot Down UFO During Operation Desert Storm

Contrary to widespread belief and propaganda, the Zetans have no shielding capability. Hehehe



[edit on 9-10-2004 by Paul_Richard]



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 10:45 AM
link   
I dont think it was terrosts what did 9/11 and i dont think it will be terrosts that do the next attack (nuclear) well maybe it might be, but the NWO will let it happen to scare people into thinking terrorism is a threat.

The bible code predicts a nuclear attack

2006 ISRAEL ATOMIC HOLOCAUST BIN LADEN.

The bible code also predicted 9/11 of course everyone knows it wasnt Osama Bin Scapegoat, the bible also predicts an alien attack.

"The beast will cast down great terrors from the sky"



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 11:02 AM
link   
Paul Richard, that site you linked too for the UFO downed in the Gulf is probably a load of bunk.. as the below statement attests:




The UFO was most likely downed by a tomahawk cruise missile, although every ship in the u.s. task force deployed in the Persian gulf emptied its conventional armaments to destroy it.


Unlikely..... a cruise missile has its target co-ords preset, as it is used to attack fixed installations. it cannot be used to down a highly maneuvarable alien spaceship...And i doubt the entire 5th Fleet and the British Task force would have used that much ammo, and no-one would know about it.. The British anti-missile system Phalanx uses enormous amounts of ammo, and can easily bring down and incoming missile,(we save the USS Missouri from an Exocet), sop could probably bring down a zippy little UFO

it might be that the site merely has its facts a little wrong and it did happen, however, it doesn't lend alot to credability when they claim things such as the above.



posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 11:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by stumason
Paul Richard, that site you linked too for the UFO downed in the Gulf is probably a load of bunk.. as the below statement attests:




The UFO was most likely downed by a tomahawk cruise missile, although every ship in the u.s. task force deployed in the Persian gulf emptied its conventional armaments to destroy it.


Unlikely..... a cruise missile has its target co-ords preset, as it is used to attack fixed installations. it cannot be used to down a highly maneuvarable alien spaceship...And i doubt the entire 5th Fleet and the British Task force would have used that much ammo, and no-one would know about it.. The British anti-missile system Phalanx uses enormous amounts of ammo, and can easily bring down and incoming missile,(we save the USS Missouri from an Exocet), sop could probably bring down a zippy little UFO

it might be that the site merely has its facts a little wrong and it did happen, however, it doesn't lend alot to credability when they claim things such as the above.


You're assuming that the reporter knew exactly what he/she thought was used on the UFO by the military. Notice that he/she stated, most likely downed by instead of reported by the government to have been downed by. It may indeed have been a Tomahawk missile or it might have been something else. The important point made is that a UFO can be shot down in the first place.

As far as using a great deal of ammunition is concerned, that makes a lot of sense because the extreme speeds of Zetan probes make them purposely difficult to target and destroy. The Zetans probably wanted to monitor Operation Desert Storm and underestimated the latest Terran naval technologies -- and lost their television camera of the game. Boohoo.

Another tidbit...

Bob Lazar recalled from his work at a top-secret government installation to reverse engineer Zetan-alien spacecraft, that the US military was experimenting with blowing holes through alien metal and was successful in that endeavor. Zetan spacecraft metal is very tough but not invulnerable. They can be killed and their ships can be destroyed.

But not easily.




posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 11:40 AM
link   
what the hell are Zetans? Where do they come from? How do you "know" so much about them.
plus, it is NOT possible at all, in anyway shape or form, that the "UFO" was downed by a Tomohawk. End of story. they do not having the tracking capability or speed to attack a bloody 747 (well speed wise they might outrun a 747, but I am just making a point), let alone a UFO.

Now, don't get me wrong, I believe in UFOs and Aliens, but what gets me is all this Zetan and baby eating reptilian nonsense that is on the interweb..it makes any serious approach to understanding the phenonemon look just as bad as claims that the Queen is a shape shifting lizard, and the whole world laughs at you, and hampers any scientific study into ET.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join