It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by The Old American
No "truth" there.
Just more cold-war, commie-bashing.
Baby boomers. Ick.
Good thing we have Obamacare to fill their pockets, then!
The amount you make for yourself doesn't matter. Keeping anything for yourself is selfish and cruel, anyway. As long as you are starving so that your neighbor lives, you are a good little citizen.
Originally posted by FractalChaos13242017
It establishes a non-profit group, that the government doesn't directly control, PCORI, to study different kinds of treatments to see what works better and is the best use of money. ( Citation: Page 665, sec. 1181 )
Sham
It forbids insurance companies from discriminating based on a disability, or because they were the victim of domestic abuse in the past (yes, insurers really did deny coverage for that) ( Citation: Page 47, sec. 2705 )
If they are private companies, let them choose who they want... if they still have customers, then they stay in business.
It says that health insurance companies can no longer tell customers that they won't get any more coverage because they have hit a "lifetime limit". Basically, if someone has paid for health insurance, that company can't tell that person that he's used that insurance too much throughout his life so they won't cover him any more. They can't do this for lifetime spending, and they're limited in how much they can do this for yearly spending. ( Citation: Page 14, sec. 2711 )
How do people think insurance companies make money? Although there's much more to that... admittedly.
Kids can continue to be covered by their parents' health insurance until they're 26. ( Citation: Page 15, sec. 2714 )
Outrageous! Don't give me no crap about young adults not being able to afford health care.
Insurers need to have an appeals process for when they turn down a claim, so customers have some manner of recourse other than a lawsuit when they're turned down. ( Citation: Page 42, sec. 2719 )
Although the government forcing this... is over the line, as if there is one.
I'm not gonna lie, this site is not very impressive... but I haven't read it through yet. Still reading
Originally posted by FissionSurplus
reply to post by crankyoldman
Well said, cranky. Everybody who is thrilled about this really doesn't understand what it truly means or how much it is going to really cost each and every one of us.
I read the OP and was wondering, where is the part where it is AFFORDABLE for the average, middle-class American? Where is the part that states that it is not going to cost my husband and myself $2000 a month, like they want to charge us now (hence we have no health insurance)?
Show me the part that says that people will be able to afford this without it severely impacting their monthly budget. All the rest of this is insurance reform, plain and simple, which should have been done anyway, without making us all pay through the nose for it. Then show me the section that says what our tax penalty will be, since we can afford neither insurance nor the penalty.
Originally posted by Missing Blue Sky
reply to post by ManFromEurope
You ask..."Are you on their side?" meaning the side of the insurance companies. Of course we should be on their side. They are our friends and neighbors. They are trying to run a business. Insurance is not a charity run by imaginary do-gooders- it is business run by people just like you and me. They collect money, invest it and pay claims. If you take away their ability to collect money...then their is no money to pay claims.
I find it truly outrageous that 19-26 year olds want to be on their parents insurance. What kind of generation are we raising...absolutely pathetic.
Outrageous! Don't give me no crap about young adults not being able to afford health care.
Originally posted by Scope and a Beam
I just don't get how anyone can be against free healthcare for those who can't afford it. What's wrong with that?
Originally posted by FissionSurplus
reply to post by crankyoldman
I read the OP and was wondering, where is the part where it is AFFORDABLE for the average, middle-class American? Where is the part that states that it is not going to cost my husband and myself $2000 a month, like they want to charge us now (hence we have no health insurance)?