Supression of Cultural "same/single race" development by Multiculturalist Agenda. $*

reply to post by Viking9019


Once again who has admitted this agenda? links please, don't say everything as fact when It clearly is not.

reply to post by boymonkey74


Someone has fooled you. Genetic prowess is founded by keeping the same genes and not mixing them. Mixing causes weakness. It is when genes are not mixed, that those genes can pick up where their fathers left off, thus enabling them to evolve. Someone has fooled you that everyone is gonna be TAN one day. I consider myself tan as it is, and its not because of my ethnicity its because of my lifestyle outdoors.

EDIT: Survival of the fittest is how life is supposed to be lived. Only this day and age natural selection has been taken out of the picture. As you can see, we now carry the poor/weak/braindead on our backs and give them a free ride, without letting nature take care of itself.

reply to post by Viking9019

Incest is healthier then race mixing

This guy would rather # his sister than race mix. Are you from the south?

Haha. Wow.

I'm surprised that people still fall for this. It's one of the oldest divide and conquer tactics in the book.

People can't make up their minds here. Are the races in the Western world self-segregated and overdue for a race war? Or is multiculturalism being pushed on us so that we become a single slave race that's subservient to the evil Jews? Ugh... brain fart.

The fact is, when you're opposed to something like interracial relationships, or other religions, or whatever, you'll find whatever reason you can to discredit it.

When I think of all the "mixed" people I know (what a farce, both my parents are "black" but there's obviously more to it), they are just as intelligent and healthy - or not - as all of the "non-mixed" people I know.

In fact, some of the best performing guys in my A-Level year were mixed. They beat the English guys, the Filipino guys and the Indian guys.


You will find "scientific" evidence for anything you want to believe. It might as well be the psuedoscience equivalent of Rule 34.

P.S. C'mon bro, it's not only the whites who feel targeted. My great aunt won't shut up about the "dilution of the Black Race". Y'all need to have some OJ and chill.

Originally posted by Viking9019
reply to post by boymonkey74

 

Dogs are the only species on Earth that can produce healthy mongrel offspring.Hell,even horses have their genetic problems because of the mixing.

Only whites can produce whites.blacks black and Asians...Asians.When we go with a non intended opposite,we create a mongrel offspring where the genes will become bland and will go extinct(we now know this to be true).Incest is healthier then race mixing and actually has genetic benefits.

You can only produce healthy offspring after your own kind,which is the whole point of REPRODUCING.

Please don't believe the goverment and their race related propaganda.

edit on 28/6/12 by Viking9019 because: (no reason given)

What you say is actually right.
Take a look at brazils, the worlds biggest mongrels.
en.wikipedia.org...

horrible health outcomes, wed sooner die than become one, were simply not meant to become one

reply to post by ultimatefighter2014


The wiki does not say that the health problems in Brazil are due to them being a mongrel nation.
Like I said before post links telling us that we are not supposed to mix because it is bad for the human race, don't just post your opinion, post facts and sources...

Originally posted by chadderson
reply to post by boymonkey74

 

Someone has fooled you. Genetic prowess is founded by keeping the same genes and not mixing them. Mixing causes weakness. It is when genes are not mixed, that those genes can pick up where their fathers left off, thus enabling them to evolve. Someone has fooled you that everyone is gonna be TAN one day. I consider myself tan as it is, and its not because of my ethnicity its because of my lifestyle outdoors.

EDIT: Survival of the fittest is how life is supposed to be lived. Only this day and age natural selection has been taken out of the picture. As you can see, we now carry the poor/weak/braindead on our backs and give them a free ride, without letting nature take care of itself.

edit on 28-6-2012 by chadderson because: (no reason given)

I agree. Im not only talking genetically, natural selection has been taken out of the picture for bias reasons. Deceptive reasons for mix breeding when one parent is ignorant of the bias intentions of the other thus doesnt think he has anything to lose, and the unfair treatment of children of same family of different genetic make up. this is a issue of divide and concour.. When quality of life becomes what it wasnt meant to be.. there are two roads one of the bias intent of one parent and the other of the ignorance/carelessness of the other.. who has the upper hand.. and who suffers? Im not saying this is the case all the time of course.

Someone is preventing you from marrying someone in your race and having children? lol a bit paranoid.

Its part of the minority is going to take over paranoia.

I like all types of girls, dated different girls.. but im sure will end up with someone from my race...

No one is preventing you from marrying the same race, if someone from race is marrying someone else, then its their choice...maybe they see something in the other guy over you... it could be just a individual thing, not racial...

you probably seen someone you like or multiple interracial couple and start to think "oh, there is an agenda" No, world use to be part apart from each other, now everyone(well.. now i guess most) living together... maybe they like something about someone from other race that they can't find in someone from their own race..

he might be smart, gets A+, has better job, might be a better father... or actually wants to have children... etc, lots of factors.

In fact just half an hour of research says it is better to be mixed race..

www.telegraph.co.uk...

news.bbc.co.uk...

ontd-political.livejournal.com...

primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk...


And no where can I find what some of you claim that it is better genetically to stay with your own people..


Oh and about Brazil.

In Brazil, Breen is able to do something even more remarkable than simply looking at the influence of genetic heritage on mixed and non-mixed people. This is also a country of great social inequity, and that means that he can separate out factors such as wealth, education and nutrition – the influence of environment from the influence of the genes. His study was concerned with post-traumatic stress disorder, one of the most common psychiatric consequences of exposure to violent crime. The preliminary results seem to indicate that people who live with the unrelenting violence and extreme poverty of the favelas or city slums experience the same levels of stress as those who live in the affluent suburbs. But the kicker is this: affluent people are overwhelmingly of European ancestry alone, but the favelas are home to people of mixed race. Mixed-race people are more likely to have a good functioning copy of each gene that we inherit from our mother and our father, which means they are more likely to have healthy biological systems to enable them to cope with stress.

If this really is the case, then taken together there is now good evidence that the more genetically diverse among us are indeed more likely to be more attractive, have better physical health, and more robust mental health, too.

Read more at ONTD Political: ontd-political.livejournal.com...

Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by Viking9019

 

Incest is healthier then race mixing

This guy would rather # his sister than race mix. Are you from the south?

This is the the type of ignorant thought patterns of the current mix generations who cant get their mind out of the gutter..who'd rather come up with ridiculous observations, comparisons, and generalizations rather than put some thought into it. Thanks for your two cents sir.. you are hilarious.. i mean it.

reply to post by metatronobody


Who is the ignorant one here? you spout BS and provide no links nor any type of proof of your claims.

This thread is boarding on racism.

Originally posted by ihavenoaccount
Haha. Wow.

I'm surprised that people still fall for this. It's one of the oldest divide and conquer tactics in the book.

People can't make up their minds here. Are the races in the Western world self-segregated and overdue for a race war? Or is multiculturalism being pushed on us so that we become a single slave race that's subservient to the evil Jews? Ugh... brain fart.

The fact is, when you're opposed to something like interracial relationships, or other religions, or whatever, you'll find whatever reason you can to discredit it.

When I think of all the "mixed" people I know (what a farce, both my parents are "black" but there's obviously more to it), they are just as intelligent and healthy - or not - as all of the "non-mixed" people I know.

In fact, some of the best performing guys in my A-Level year were mixed. They beat the English guys, the Filipino guys and the Indian guys.


You will find "scientific" evidence for anything you want to believe. It might as well be the psuedoscience equivalent of Rule 34.

P.S. C'mon bro, it's not only the whites who feel targeted. My great aunt won't shut up about the "dilution of the Black Race". Y'all need to have some OJ and chill.

While things like Protocols of the Elders of Zion exist I have reasons to believe that its not all fair game. I still dont think that mixing is all bad.. but if its done intentionally for someone to gain an upper hand.. Id rather be cautious than careless. As I've said earlier my experience has not been a good one.. as i see peoples closest to me potential being misdirected by unworthy candidates who have nothing good to add.. but take what they dont deserve and turn it to their advantage, I see families degraded, torn apart, decay of moral and societal values, .. and the list goes on.

Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by metatronobody

 

Who is the ignorant one here? you spout BS and provide no links nor any type of proof of your claims.

This thread is boarding on racism.

edit on 28-6-2012 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)

I thought you left.. so much for the value of what you say.

reply to post by metatronobody


Who is mixing people for their own gain? more people are having kids with a different person from another culture because they love each other, that is it. You say stuff but provide no evidence, oh and yes I left but when people started posting utter BS I had to come back.

I will say it one more time....EVIDENCE OR WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS JUST BS..

Originally posted by boymonkey74
2) In many generations we will all be the same colour thus ending racism and what a great age that will be.

I have a mixed race child. Sometimes he complains about being mixed race.

Does that make him a racist?

People, on the whole, prefer to mate with their own race. Your dream of a 'same coloured' race is just that. A dream.

Originally posted by muse7
it's stupid that people think that the color of someone's skin is soo important. Inside we're all the same.

I don't care what color someone's skin is.

I do care whether they are on my team or not!

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by metatronobody

 

Seriously, why is multiculturalism such a bad thing?

Have you ever heard of the Balkans?

reply to post by ollncasino


No it's maths and common sense, we can meet more and more different cultures due to being able to travel to different parts of the world and we will procreate with different cultures.
More and more people are being born mixed race news.bbc.co.uk...

Iam not saying it will be a hundred years down the line Iam talking about 50 or so generations.
The only bad thing I see about this happening is the fact my fave colour hair on a girl (Red) is going to be extinct
www.digitaljournal.com...

Interesting read:

For the past several decades, the leading opinion-makers in the media, the universities and the churches have promulgated the view that notions of Western political and economic dominance are the residue of Western exploitation of, and aggression towards, other cultures. Underlying this view—and the corresponding notion that these other cultures are “morally equal” if not superior to the West--is an overwhelmingly negative critique of Western civilization itself.

According to this ideology, instead of attempting to globalize its values, the West should stay in its own cultural backyard. Values like universal human rights, individualism and liberalism are regarded merely as ethnocentric products of Western history. The scientific knowledge that the West has produced is simply one of many "ways of knowing." In place of Western universalism, this critique of the West offers the relativism of multiculturalism, a concept that regards the West not as the pinnacle of human achievement to date, but as simply one of many equally valid cultural systems.

Although originally designed to foster tolerance and respect for other cultures, these sentiments were subsequently captured by the radical left and used for its political ends. Thus the history of Western culture is regarded as little more than a crime against the rest of humanity. The West, say the critics, cannot judge other cultures but must condemn its own.

Though commonly known as multiculturalism, this position is defined by its supporters with a series of post prefixes: postmodernism, poststructuralism, postcolonialism. However, it is best understood as an "anti" phenomenon because it defines itself not by what it is for, but by what it is against. It is entirely a negation of Western culture and values: whatever the West supports, this anti-West rejects.

With the demise of Marxism in the late 1980s, multiculturalism emerged as its major ideological successor. What follows is an overview of some of the creed's major precepts:

Western culture was founded on aggression towards others. The whole of Western culture since the ancient Greeks is something to be disowned.

Western literature and arts endorse imperialism. Rather than reflecting “the glory that was Greece and the grandeur that was Rome,” the Western literary heritage is politically contaminated. This charge is reinforced by a critical apparatus based on gender, race and class. Othello is branded as ethnocentric; Paradise Lost as misogynistic; Hemingway as pathologically heterosexual.

The Western economic system exploits the rest of the world. Globalization is a euphemism for American imperialism. The poverty of the Third World is guaranteed by debts from the International Monetary Fund and the free-market policies of the World Trade Organization.

Victimhood should prevail over individualism. Individualism is both the cause and effect of capitalism, which in its turn produced the imperialism that now oppresses the wretched of the earth. The idea of individual human rights deriving from the Enlightenment is the one great barrier to a collectivist solution for humankind.

In its pursuit of these ideas, the multicultural left has worked hard to deconstruct the traditional history curriculum of American schools. Western history is no longer to be judged by the record of its achievements. Instead, it is to become a story of the struggle of its victims against oppression and discrimination, and of how they have risen to challenge their exploiters. Consequently, the purpose of teaching history becomes an effort to "empower" victims rather than to tell the truth about the past.

Source: www.discoverthenetworks.org...