It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by luxordelphi
If the house of Rothschild owns the weather channel, which they do, who is directing weather as portrayed in that media? What...do I have to start spelling here?
That's ludicrous. There are literally tens of thousands of organizations and individuals who are predicting the weather. . None of them has ever raised even the faintest suggestion that the Weather Channel is faking the weather forecasts or weather discussions.
If it were happening, then it would be moronically easy to demonstrate. Go for it - simply find a meteorologist who thinks chemtrails are not just persistent contrails.
I contend that there is no visible or other physical evidence of high-altitude spraying, and so I do not believe in chemtrails.
Originally posted by onecraftydude
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by luxordelphi
If the house of Rothschild owns the weather channel, which they do, who is directing weather as portrayed in that media? What...do I have to start spelling here?
That's ludicrous. There are literally tens of thousands of organizations and individuals who are predicting the weather. . None of them has ever raised even the faintest suggestion that the Weather Channel is faking the weather forecasts or weather discussions.
If it were happening, then it would be moronically easy to demonstrate. Go for it - simply find a meteorologist who thinks chemtrails are not just persistent contrails.
I did exactly that and you dismissed it offhand. You are not interested in the truth, only your image.
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by onecraftydude
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by luxordelphi
If the house of Rothschild owns the weather channel, which they do, who is directing weather as portrayed in that media? What...do I have to start spelling here?
That's ludicrous. There are literally tens of thousands of organizations and individuals who are predicting the weather. . None of them has ever raised even the faintest suggestion that the Weather Channel is faking the weather forecasts or weather discussions.
If it were happening, then it would be moronically easy to demonstrate. Go for it - simply find a meteorologist who thinks chemtrails are not just persistent contrails.
I did exactly that and you dismissed it offhand. You are not interested in the truth, only your image.
Your videos were about chaff, not chemtrails.
Originally posted by Uncinus
If you really want to know what NOAA meteorologist Thomas Sclatter thinks about the chemtrail theory, then read this:
web.archive.org...://www.weatherwise.org/qr/qry.chemtrail.html
I contend that there is no visible or other physical evidence of high-altitude spraying, and so I do not believe in chemtrails.
Originally posted by coven83
Originally posted by Uncinus
If you really want to know what NOAA meteorologist Thomas Sclatter thinks about the chemtrail theory, then read this:
web.archive.org...://www.weatherwise.org/qr/qry.chemtrail.html
I contend that there is no visible or other physical evidence of high-altitude spraying, and so I do not believe in chemtrails.
This is fun.
Here you go, a German scientist confirms Germany's climate change/geo engineering program.
www.rense.com...
Originally posted by coven83
reply to post by Uncinus
And here is another article that refers to a symposium in Belgium in 2010. Are all of the scientists that attended this symposium and agreed that these events are taking place not credible?
coto2.wordpress.com...
Its like I said before, their are just certain people and certain conspiracies that these people wont believe until their beloved government admits to them. At which point its to late to do anything to prevent them or change the current course of action.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
So a Rothschild buys a weather forecasting company, and that proves chemtrails exist?
How does that work exactly??
Originally posted by onecraftydude
Good point. So now we can add that some airplanes are spreading microscopic particles of "Chaff" over Florida and California to the list of suspected airline emissions. Well done.
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by onecraftydude
Good point. So now we can add that some airplanes are spreading microscopic particles of "Chaff" over Florida and California to the list of suspected airline emissions. Well done.
No. Chaff is not a suspected airline emission. It's something that the military occasionally spray during exercises. This was explained in your two videos. It's not suspect, and it's not secret. It's certainly not what most people refer to as "chemtrails", seeing as it's invisible to the naked eye.
Abstract: Secondary seeding, whereby unseeded clouds ingest ice particles from cloudsthat earlier had received direct glaciogenic (e.g., silver iodide) treatment, is hypothesized to be a possible additional mechanism for the propagation of seeding effects in space and time. The ingested ice particles, after experiencing some growth in the donor cloud, act toglaciate the receptor cloud during its active growth phase and provide it precipitation embryos. These embryos give the new cloud a head-start on precipitation development asthey grow further as graupel to precipitation size in the updraft laden with high quantitiesof supercooled cloud water. This enhancement of precipitation-forming processes is postulated to be strongest in microphysically continental clouds in which natural andseeding-induced primary glaciation and hydrometeor growth are slow. A case study is presented to illustrate these processes.
Similarly, “warm rain” cloud seeding agents can be produced by “hygroscopic” flares. These flares contain some type of salt (e.g., calcium chloride). When the flares are burned they produce minute particles of the salt which attract water vapor, forming cloud droplets in addition to those already present in the cloud. Hygroscopic seeding can also be done using dry common salt (NaCl) that has been processed to optimum sizes in powder form for the promotion of droplet growth in the clouds. This salt is dispersed normally from an aircraft flying immediately below or in the updraft regions of the clouds
The pellets are placed in special insulated containers (called dry ice hoppers) for dispensing the pellets. Dry ice is most frequently dispensed from aircraft. Installations on aircraft are certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
Originally posted by mustangill
reply to post by Uncinus
Cloud seeding and cloud flaring, which is what the public calls chemtrails,
* Thomas was quoted in the Santa Fe New Mexican, a newspaper in Santa Fe, NM, on 6/20/99 as saying, "My colleague and I will release the name of our lab and detailed lab results as soon as we find a publisher willing to pay us for many months of research - and reimburse those lab tests."
* "700 tankers 'kc-135s' doing the spraying, md-80 involved, "it" is in commercial airplane fuel" 3/14/01
* Thomas admits "no insitu samples have ever been taken"...2/28/02
* "Asks for $20,000 to do the sampling"...on 2/28/02
* "late summer chemtrails will be disclosed and common knowledge"...2/28/02
* "the impending ATC crossover in wanting to know why they are not told about chemtrails" ...2/28/02
Weather Modification Association
So, I don't see any reason to continue this crazy notion that there are no chemtrails. do you because if you do then you are clearly just trolling us to death.
Originally posted by mustangill
reply to post by Uncinus
There are lots of papers and heavy research that go into Weather Modification and the seeding (chemtrails) of clouds and the use of flares. I really don't have the time to write a 5 page report for you to read not that you would care to anyway. But, Just because you hear some old man on TV say chemtrails do not exist, doesn't mean that is the truth.
All you have given here is a video and nothing more but, here I give you studies and heavy research from colleges and government granted companies. People that have poured their lives into the study of cloud chemistry, how a cloud works, how to control a cloud, how to make that cloud rain and injecting a cloud with a certain chemicals and flares to see how that cloud reacts and then to note the results.
Cloud seeding and cloud flaring, which is what the public calls chemtrails, is every bit as real as the nose on your face. So, please if you are really that interested in trying to discredit something that is real then try to discredit 9/11 or JFK.
You have the proof right here if you choose to look and BTW, it only took me 30 minutes to find this.
Weather Modification Association
Abstract: Secondary seeding, whereby unseeded clouds ingest ice particles from cloudsthat earlier had received direct glaciogenic (e.g., silver iodide) treatment, is hypothesized to be a possible additional mechanism for the propagation of seeding effects in space and time. The ingested ice particles, after experiencing some growth in the donor cloud, act toglaciate the receptor cloud during its active growth phase and provide it precipitation embryos. These embryos give the new cloud a head-start on precipitation development asthey grow further as graupel to precipitation size in the updraft laden with high quantitiesof supercooled cloud water. This enhancement of precipitation-forming processes is postulated to be strongest in microphysically continental clouds in which natural andseeding-induced primary glaciation and hydrometeor growth are slow. A case study is presented to illustrate these processes.
and look that site even has a visitors section for all your unanswered questions concerning cloud seeding and the like. All the things that you are saying is not true so, do you want to tell these people that they are bringing home a fake paycheck and that all the research they have been doing is all in their heads?
Click here for all your questions answered about chemtrails/cloud seeding ect.
and here is a snipit to debunk your claim of chemtrails are contrails:
Similarly, “warm rain” cloud seeding agents can be produced by “hygroscopic” flares. These flares contain some type of salt (e.g., calcium chloride). When the flares are burned they produce minute particles of the salt which attract water vapor, forming cloud droplets in addition to those already present in the cloud. Hygroscopic seeding can also be done using dry common salt (NaCl) that has been processed to optimum sizes in powder form for the promotion of droplet growth in the clouds. This salt is dispersed normally from an aircraft flying immediately below or in the updraft regions of the clouds
another snipet of the equipment on a plane to dispense the chemicals also certified by the FAA:
The pellets are placed in special insulated containers (called dry ice hoppers) for dispensing the pellets. Dry ice is most frequently dispensed from aircraft. Installations on aircraft are certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
this is all in the FAQS page for anyone to view.
So, I don't see any reason to continue this crazy notion that there are no chemtrails. do you because if you do then you are clearly just trolling us to death.
Originally posted by coven83
reply to post by mustangill
No one here that supports the theory of chemtrails has said that "every" contrail is a chemtrail.
Yet those that don't support this theory say that "no" contrail can be a chemtrail.
So who here is closed minded??