It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DaveNorris
so if we say that speed is relative to the observer then how can we observe the speed of light from a truely stationary position?
also, wouldnt our measurement of the speed of light change depending on if we were moving away from or towards the source of said light?
let me chuck a quick hypathetical question at you (assuming i get more than just one or two visitor to this particular thread)
lets say that we are travelling on a ship, at the speed of light (hypathetical remember), if we were travelling away from a light source at the speed of light then the distance between us and the photons travelling through space would not change, so that light would appear to be stationary.
on the flip side, if we were travelling towards a light source at the speed of light then the distance between us and the photons travelling through space would close at twice the normal rate, so that light would appear to be travelling at twice the 'speed of light'.
so, in conclusion, if speed is relative to the observer, the speed of light cannot be pinned down as 299 792 458 m / s
Originally posted by DaveNorris
also, wouldnt our measurement of the speed of light change depending on if we were moving away from or towards the source of said light?
Originally posted by DaveNorris
thanks for the replies.....
VoidHawk, my whole question hinges on the idea that speed is relative to the person taking the measurements, we all know the earth is moving through space but we dont include that when we are measuring how fast our cars move.
Vandettas, thanyou for the links, i will watch them when im at my pc (im on my phone atm)
and i will get back to you when i have watched them.
Originally posted by Phage
You have arrived at one of the problems which led Einstein to develop the theory of special relativity.
The speed of light is not relative. It is the same no matter what the frame of reference.
Weird, huh?edit on 6/23/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
im sitting in my car - the distance between me and my car is closing at a rate of 0mph, im moving 0mph
im driving to work - the distance between my car and work is closing at a rate of 40mph, im moving 40mph
both my car and my work are on earth - the earth is circling the sun at about 66,648mph, im moving 66,688mph
our solar system is orbiting a blackhole at the center of our galaxy
our galaxy is in and expanding universe........ you get were im going with this
good job thinking of it yourself, OP!!
Originally posted by DaveNorris
thanks for the replies.....
VoidHawk, my whole question hinges on the idea that speed is relative to the person taking the measurements, we all know the earth is moving through space but we dont include that when we are measuring how fast our cars move.
in space, an object has essentially zero mass. you can "lift" up an elephant as easily as a pen.