It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Proof that American Presidents are puppets

page: 1

log in


posted on Jun, 17 2012 @ 12:46 PM
OK, if this doesn't convince you, then nothing will.

In 1998, the PNAC sent 'President' Clinton a letter regarding the threat of Iraq, Saddam Hussein and his 'weapons of mass destruction'.

Here's the letter from the PNAC website-

Dear Mr. President:

We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding, and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end of the Cold War. In your upcoming State of the Union Address, you have an opportunity to chart a clear and determined course for meeting this threat.

We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world. That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime from power. We stand ready to offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor.

The policy of “containment” of Saddam Hussein has been steadily eroding over the past several months. As recent events have demonstrated, we can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War coalition to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections. Our ability to ensure that Saddam Hussein is not producing weapons of mass destruction, therefore, has substantially diminished.

Here's a little bit more persuasion-

The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able to use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction. In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing. In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power. That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy.

We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration's attention to implementing a strategy for removing Saddam's regime from power.

You have Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz behind this letter, many others. People will argue these foreign policy 'think tanks' have no say of inlfuence on American foreign policy, yet here is Clinton's 1998 State of the Union Speech-

Fast forward to 51 mins and 40 sec in, of course he brings up what he was told to do-

The lies of WMD were laid well before 9/11, the Neocons had their agenda set in the years building up to 9/11, they just needed as the PNAC stated themselves in September 2000, an event, a 'New Pearl Harbour' to make it possible

Never be deceived into thinking our leaders make decisions, they are bought out and used as puppets, they say whatever lies are needed to fulfil their master's agenda's.

posted on Jun, 17 2012 @ 01:00 PM
It is a real possibility that the republicans are the real power behind the democrats. NWO/TPTB are like smoke and very hard to geta bead on. My ideas about these things are not solid.

new topics

log in