It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Muaddib
What? Iran is rejecting Kerry's proposal?.... That can't be true..... the Bush administration must be behind this....so Americans vote for Bush....ya, it must be Bush's fault...
Originally posted by Jamuhn
You said it, noone else did.
Originally posted by Kwintz
This is why i believe Bush would be better for the job the next 4 years. I don't want an indecisive man such as Kerry in office while NK and Iran have nuclear weapons. Call me an arrogant american, but i don't want my country being pushed around by anyone, let alone rogue nations. Bush is firm and strong, and i think he could more successfully handle this nuclear situation--pre-emptive "isreali" strikes will happen very soon, IMO.
Originally posted by Phoenix
I think the Iranians know they can not stop the threat a democratic or non theologic government in Iraq poses.
IMO the recent troubles in Iraq are more or less a rearguard action to buy the Iranians time to get their nuclear weapons which to them may lessen the threat from external sources.
The sixty- four dollar question remains, just what is it they can do about growing internal opposition.
Does anybody worry that Iran with its proven state sponsoring of terror, would eventually provide these weapons to terrorists for attacks on its percieved enemies? IE; nuclear attack w/o an immediatly traceable means of delivery.
With the rejection of the Kerry proposal it looks like they certainly have ended speculation that a leadership change in america would make any difference in what they do.
Originally posted by thecry
That's what happens when you call them a terrorist state(axis of evil) they seen the invasion of Iraq and are scared they will be next,That's why they are putting a nuke program tegether so quickly,this way they could do alot of damage if the U.S tries to change their goverment like they did to Iraq. I guess you can't blame them.
Originally posted by Intelearthling
Kerry is not even a president and on top of that, he's trying to appease the enemy by saying that he'll be giving them nuclear fuel to quit their fuel-producing programs!
Great! What's it going to be next?
Yeah! We need Kerry as CIC as bad as we need a Black Plague epidemic!
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
Maybe Bush has a plan after all. Call them axis of evil so they think they have to build nukes to protect themselves thus giving the US all the ammo it needs to justify military intervention.
Originally posted by Phoenix
In a move that shows Iran will be a major policy problem no matter which candidate wins the U.S. election in November Iran has once again demonstrated its firm stance on proceeding with its current plans in regard to its nuclear ambitions.
WHY is Kerry presuming to take it apon to make those type of US foreign policy decisions and better yet why wasnt the president who should be doing this not already doing it.... I have heard very little out of the incumbant that makes me believe this issue is at the top of his list last time I checked nukes where pretty D**N important to our interests and if I have just missed the president doing something or saying something please tell me where to locate the material