It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shadowalker
You have now.
Read up.
ask.abovetopsecret.com...
Paste hydrino into the box.
Originally posted by boncho
Notice this is off a PR newswire:
BlackLight has raised a total of $75 M for the development and commercialization of its breakthrough energy technology
Which has been going on about 20 years...
Okay but what about the leading people in the field...
...leading scientists from academia and industry with PhDs from prestigious universities including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the California Institute of Technology, confirm that BlackLight has achieved a technological breakthrough....
Oh wow?
Dr. K.V. Ramanujachary, Rowan University Meritorious Professor....
Mills paid Rowan for research and it wasn't independent... But I read something about more than one:
W. Henry Weinberg, who was a professor of Chemical Engineering, Chemistry and Applied Physics at California Institute of Technology
Who was a professor?
Dr. Terry Copeland, former manager of product development for several electrochemical and energy companies including DuPont Company and Duracell
Former manager?
While there is a lot of hype, there are no referenced papers that are mentioned, which might have been nice.
A 100 W unit is planned for completion by the end of 2012, and a 1.5 kiloWatt (kW) pilot unit that can serve the residential power market, as an initial target commercial application, is expected to be operational by 2013
So Mills believes powering a lightbulb is going to earn him a few more million.
Originally posted by boncho
Found a "confidential" report from Weinberg. You can get it off of Mill's site Here. In PDF format.
Which makes me wonder, if it is confidential, why is Mills posting it. And how is that considered validation?
1000% gain over the energy input, if true I'd sell my facebook and buy this, if I had been stupid enough to buy facebook.
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by CaptChaos
Many people have tried to reproduce Meyer's work using his original designs and patents and have failed.
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by CaptChaos
Many people have tried to reproduce Meyer's work using his original designs and patents and have failed. It is most likely that he was using an metal catalyst or design that was burning some hidden fuel entirely. He was a fraud.
He also claimed that Saudi's offered him billions of dollars while he was out trying to make money off of his device.
Snake oil.
Oh and Jesus spoke to him as well...
But go ahead and carry on the tradition he started by buying a kit to power your car on water. Feel free to post the results.edit on 30-5-2012 by boncho because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by CaptChaos
Many people have tried to reproduce Meyer's work using his original designs and patents and have failed.
hmmm, but who were those "many people"? were they paid to fail?
You sound like some one who watched one video and formed an opinion .
Do you really know this guys history ?
If you did you would not be making such stupid remarks .
Yes he was using exotic materials he did not disclose everything .. like a fool
and they killed him when he was about to ruin the global petroleum market .
Do some research .
Take the glow in the dark paint that is capable of replacing street lighting for example?
Output (lumens) 210-2700 1000-7500 1900-30000 3600-46000 1800-33000
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by R0CR13
You sound like some one who watched one video and formed an opinion .
Do you really know this guys history ?
.
If you did you would not be making such stupid remarks .
Yes he was using exotic materials he did not disclose everything .. like a fool
and they killed him when he was about to ruin the global petroleum market .
Do some research .
You can use ATS Search and type "Boncho Blacklightpower" or "Boncho Stanley Meyer" and see what you come up with.
oo0oo0oooh Researchiness...
I'll give you a hand, Stan meyer debunked in forums dedicated to him.edit on 31-5-2012 by boncho because: (no reason given)
But to claim Meyer was fraud is just slanderous .
The reality is that Stan Meyer was convicted of fraud in 1996 after he was unable to demonstrate his claims to investors or the court after soliciting large sums of money for commercializing his technology.
Two years later, a Fayette County judge found "gross and egregious fraud" in Meyer's contract negotiation with two businessmen. Their money was returned.
Originally posted by jonnywhite
Nuclear power is still safe, despite what happened in Japan.