Bush weak on debate- terror alerts on the way!

Originally posted by Bleys


I've seen keholmes/seth and many others repeatedly ask you and tempe for proof to verify your claims - you never do. You either change the subject, resorting to personal attacks or you log off until the heat is off you.

There are many here that dislike this administration and they are able to articulate a specific grievance with facts and logic. You hurt your own cause with your shrill one-liner rhetoric. Surely you can do better.

.

I'm sorry to say, that I do show proof of what I state in 99% of my post or threads, I usually post "URLS" in my posts.

BTW, I do not "log off" as you stated,........... I never do, and the only time that I have ever had to sign in is after I have had to "re-boot" my computer,.......... , so try again Bleys , one other thing,....... it depends on which "party" your for as to what the truth is and I'm sorry to say that the Republican party think they give all the truths and that is a total falsehood,

did you think i missed it the first time? or is this the start of another rundown of the same old lies from the Kool-Aid crowd?

Originally posted by dgtempe

If they're going to play the "terror" card couldnt they at least do it also when Bush is high on the (so called) polls, just to give the illusion this doesnt have anything to do with the ratings? really. How stupid can you be.

Once again...how stupid can you be, thinking that 650 voters that were interviewed for the polls after the debate account for what most Americans think?..... Have you even checked who is winning in most states?

And once again..since you all know exactly what Kerry's plans are for Iraq and how he plans on winning...including making better international relations...it doesn't matter that Iran refused Kerry's proposal on giving them fuel in exchange for promises... Can you all explain his plan for iraq? is he pulling out of Iraq?

Do you agree with the dumbass plan of Kerry to not use force to defend the US unless there is a global test? unless the world agrees on how we must defend ourselves? Or his plan to unilaterally halt all US advanced weapon systems?..... while the world are still upgrading theirs?

You people talk about us being sheep....yet you nod your heads when Kerry wants the US to be the puppet of the UN and do what the world wants... it doesn't matter that the other nations of the UN can pretty much do whatever they want and anwser to noone....



[edit on 5-10-2004 by Muaddib]

Let me leave you with a quote, one I am sure Kerry would nod up and down while you accept his stance on the US becoming the UN's puppet...as it stands, the plan of at least the last three democratic presidents seemed to be to make the US a socialist country, or as close to one as they possibly could make us...

"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of "liberalism" they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing what happened."
Norman Thomas, 1936 presidential candidate on the Socialist ticket

proliberty.com...

[edit on 5-10-2004 by Muaddib]

Originally posted by Sauron

I saved the only thing in you post that makes sense

...after reading your reply, i find it funny that you talk about a post not making much sense.....

and again....you democrats/liberals have to be spewing crap as always...there is nothing you can truly prove...unless you take Rense, propagandamatrix, or AlJazeera seriously.....

Originally posted by dgtempe
Seth, you're doing it again. Dont you EVER post such crap about me. Jump right in and accuse me of such an absurd thing. Im a better American than you are any day, buddy.

Like you haven't done the same or worse dg? and yes, you are making light on possible threats to the US. If the president or any Republicans did that liberals/democrats would be jumping and bashing saying that it is a serious issue..... I haven't seen any posts of yours with one shred of evidence...you just speculate in wild theories as if they were the truth... Yes, you do have a right to say whatever you want...it still doens't make it true...much less since you don't post any real evidence to back up your claims...

[edit on 5-10-2004 by Muaddib]

Muaddib, feel better? OK, let's get back to the topic at hand please, as if anyone can remember the topic. Just look to the top of the page, it's there.

Originally posted by nanna_of_6

So much for Bush's " WAR ON TERROR", and the Republicans don't understand where the rest of us came up with the knowledge the Bush and his Administration are nothing but Liars and Murderers.

Once again... you people keep claiming all this crap and it shows how much you know about the subject.
Nanna...Clinton was saying the same things president Bush and his administration were saying before the war...Clinton and his administration were democrats.... well, they are still democrats...

If Bush and his administration lied, then Clinton and his administration lied....and so did most of the world including the UN....the 1999 UNMOVIC report...which is an agency under UN for democrats and liberals that don't seem to know this was stating that there were tons of wmd in iraq that were unnacounted for.....

The following is what Australia was saying, through their intelligence, about Saddam wmd...

Australia to Conduct Review of Intelligence Agencies


Australian Prime Minister John Howard announced plans today for an independent review of Australia�s intelligence assessments of Iraq�s prewar WMD capabilities (see GSN, June 18, 2003; Belinda Goldsmith, Reuters, March 1).

The committee found that most Australian intelligence agencies had determined that Iraq possessed, at best, �small stocks� of weapons of mass destruction before the war. The Office of National Assessments, which advised Prime Minister John Howard, however, was more willing to use untested information to determine that it was �highly likely� that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, according to Reuters.

Excerpted from.
www.nti.org...

You can also find several of my threads showing what Clinton, Kerry and most other democrats were saying about Iraq/Saddam wmd, and about the connection he had with terrorists including Al-Qaeda......

This is getting ridiculous.....

[edit on 5-10-2004 by Muaddib]

Originally posted by intrepid
Muaddib, feel better? OK, let's get back to the topic at hand please, as if anyone can remember the topic.

Just look to the top of the page, it's there.

And i ask...what substance is there to the thread?

have the threats only been given when Bush has lost, according to liberals and democrats, any debates?

I guess we were not attacked by terrorists when Clinton was in office either huh?..... and since Clinton decided to avoid and ignore the issue of terrorism the terrorist attacks on the US stopped huh?...

Ignoring these threats do not stop terrorist attacks as we saw when Clinton was in office.... unless of course, democrats/liberals want to deny this fact...

[edit on 5-10-2004 by Muaddib]

Originally posted by Muaddib

Ignoring these threats do not stop terrorist attacks as we saw when Clinton was in office.... unless of course, democrats/liberals want to deny this fact...

[edit on 5-10-2004 by Muaddib]

I'm not deying anything, I just want to keep this on an even keel with the topic at hand and no slinging of S around.

Ignoring these threats do not stop terrorist attacks as we saw when Clinton was in office.... unless of course, democrats/liberals want to deny this fact...

Why do you insist on stereotyping peoples' opinions on world events by connecting those opinions to political labels such as "Republicans", and, "democrats/liberals"? Is it possible for an opinion to be merely an opinion, and yet also be politically neutral? What standard are you using to categorize each opinion?

MK

Seth, I read your comments about your co-worker, tsk tsk, you're surrounded by incompetent left winged nuts...I'm surprised anyone's free to talk against Bush in the workplace..unless of course, he owns the place.
Have a little tolerance for your fellow man.
Are you going to a Cheney victory party tonight?

I was right. Schools! Schools!

This is even more horrific than what i thought they'd say. Look what happened to Russia, it could happen here.
Send your kids to school and if you're like me, stay outside in your cars, cellular phones and rosary beads on hand- along with your rifle.
Scare the kids to death!
Scare the hell out of everyone, Bush. Dont worry, we dont want this to happen, so WE WILL VOTE FOR YOU. JUST LEAVE OUR KIDS ALONE.

I pray that we can get this man out of the White House.

..Sorry yahoo news thread isnt working...I tried to post it, so I wouldnt be questioned as to the validity of my statement.

[edit on 7-10-2004 by dgtempe]