It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Twins living in the Colony Park Apartments say they were unlawfully arrested by Pearl Police Tuesday after watching and recording the shooting investigation at their apartment complex.
The twins' mother believes they were arrested because she moved her truck after she saw Pearl Police using it as a shield during the shooting.
"I moved my vehicle, and I'm pretty sure that upset him and when my kids came out they were on the balcony and my son taking the picture, filming or whatever he was doing with the phone probably upset him," said Karen
They were released on their own recognizance around seven o'clock and Madison said she learned at that time they were charged with disorderly conduct.
Madison said the police department returned her son's phone but kept the SIM card.
Originally posted by smyleegrl
I don't know the law, but could the sim card be considered evidence? Just a thought.
And who would move their car during a potentially lethal situation? Why risk your life to do so?
I, too, find this story....,strange.
Originally posted by stanguilles7
...I suppose I should remember this is in Mississippi
Originally posted by digital01anarchy
reply to post by stanguilles7
Logical guessing would tell you cops positioned them self's behind the car before the incident, the lady saw this and moved her car.
Ps cops wouldn't pay for any damage to her car so why would she let them use it as a shield.I mean police have their own vehicles why use hers?
Number 2 forced entry without warrant=illegal.
Confiscation of privet property=illegal.
unjust detainment=illegal.
Disorderly conduct is a trumped up charge they use when they cant arrest someone but want to
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Confiscation of privet property=illegal.
Uh, no. Confiscation of evidence is not illegal. If the phone was evidence, it can certainly be confiscated.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by stanguilles7
Confiscation of privet property=illegal.
Uh, no. Confiscation of evidence is not illegal. If the phone was evidence, it can certainly be confiscated.
With a warrant. So there's that.
In certain cases a search warrant is not required, such as where consent is given by a person in control of the object or property to be searched. Some commonly cited exigent circumstances are: hot pursuit of a felon (to prevent a felon's escape or ability to harm others); imminent destruction of evidence before a warrant can be properly obtained; emergency searches (such as where someone is heard screaming for help inside a dwelling); or a search incident to arrest (to mitigate the risk of harm to the arresting officers specifically).
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Yes but since video taping police from your balcany is not a crime they would've needed a warrant to keep the SIM card. Police can take something as evidence if it's used for a crime without a warrant.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Just because that might hold evidence doesn't automatically give police the right to seize it without a warrant. If it was used in a crime, like peeping then they can take it.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
In process if it's used in the alledged crime. There's no crime with the cell phone involved.