It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Roman Catholic Errors
DOGMA
Emperor Constantine is the connection which bonded Paganism to the belief in Yeshua the Messiah. Excused as "inculturation," paganism POISONED the message of repentance beyond all recognition.
Constantine made Christianity the Roman State Religion -- but it's form was FAR from anything known to the first Nazarenes. Constantine had to MERGE the multitudes of Pagans -- who were mostly his own soldiers -- with the Nazarene faith in order to control his vast empire. This reconciliation, or MERGER of the Nazarene faith with MITHRAISM produced what we see today as "Christianity" -- in particular the Roman Catholic Church. He made the cross the PRIMARY SYMBOL of this new merger, thus rallying the Pagans around its emotional meaning. Constantine CONFUSED Mithras and the Messiah together, borrowing from the Pagan background of SUN-WORSHIP for every interpretation. Alexander Hislop, in his work The Two Babylons, wrote about this same topic over 100 years ago, and explained how this FUSION occurred with Christianity:
"To conciliate the Pagans to nominal Christianity, Rome, pursuing its usual policy, took measures to get CHRISTIAN and PAGAN festivals amalgamated, and by a complicated but skillful adjustment of the CALENDAR, it was found no difficult matter, in general, to get Paganism and Christianity -- now far sunk in idolatry -- in this as in so many other things, to shake hands."
Constantine adopted the insignia called the "LABARUM" -- a cross with a wreath above it with the Greek letters CHI and RHO inside it. He had it displayed on the shields of his soldiers as the "Christian" emblem to go forth to conquer in. In the Middle Ages the nations of Europe joined forces with the Papacy to launch "crusades," not only against the Moslems in the Middle East, but against the Albigenses and Waldensians in France, independent Christian groups which foreshadowed the Protestant Reformation by several hundred years, and "crusades" against the Jews in Eastern Europe. The Crusades were launched with the marauding murderers wearing large red cruxes emblazoned on their chests. The word "Crusade" refers to this crux. They were sent off by various popes to primarily recapture the holy land from "the infidels." Killing, raping, looting and burning libraries in their path, these thirteen "divine campaigns" defy description. They flung the civilized world into the dark ages -- and made no small contribution to the spread of the Black Death. The "cross" of the Church was bathed in blood from one end of Europe to the other, and in Asia.
The main issue at his Nicene Council in 325 A.D. centered on the date of EASTER, again the most important point in the Pagan mind when the sun crossed the Zodiac at Taurus. Constantine reinvented the meaning behind Easter in order to desolate Passover. He also established the practice of Sun-day worship, superseding the scriptural day of rest -- the Sabbath -- which is the sign that we worship the true Creator -- YEHOVAH God. He claimed the resurrection as the reason for both Easter and Sun-day -- and HE GOT AWAY WITH IT!
Originally posted by lobotomizemecapin
Yeah what I dont get is why so many people dont bother to look things like this up. Most christians I tell about this have no idea and have never heard of mithra.
In 545 AD, Justinian declared it a heresy to believe in Transmigration. This is after Origen, a Christian philosopher, states that it was what the Bible was saying to us. Since that time, Christianity has thought it to be theologically unsound. I do not take this position. There are many mysteries in the Bible that God leaves for us to find. I believe that transmigration of the soul is one of them.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
Don't forget 545 AD. Justinian declared transmigration of the soul a heresy.
In 545 AD, Justinian declared it a heresy to believe in Transmigration. This is after Origen, a Christian philosopher, states that it was what the Bible was saying to us. Since that time, Christianity has thought it to be theologically unsound. I do not take this position. There are many mysteries in the Bible that God leaves for us to find. I believe that transmigration of the soul is one of them.
That SuperiorEd always had good threads and posts. LINK
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Originally posted by lobotomizemecapin
Yeah what I dont get is why so many people dont bother to look things like this up. Most christians I tell about this have no idea and have never heard of mithra.
It's not that christianity in and of itself is corrupted. The Protestant Reformation moved to counter much of what Catholicism has done, if it wasn't for Peter Waldo and the Waldensies and the French Hugenaughts we would never know what they have done, those people sacrificed their lives to rescue christianity from the Cult of Mithra. Martin Luther started it but he left it to us to finish it. Catholicism is not christianity. Catholicism is Mithraism masquerading as Christianity. Remember Yeshua said we would know false prophets and false disciples by the fruits of their labors.edit on 15-4-2012 by lonewolf19792000 because: (no reason given)
I think that there are Catholic faithful that will be saved and have found truth. The leadership abuses their seat of authority.
Some have speculated that inspiration for Maitreya may have come from the ancient Indo-Iranian deity Mithra. The primary comparison between the two characters appears to be the similarity of their names. According to a book entitled The Religion of the Iranian Peoples, "No one who has studied the Zoroastrian doctrine of the Saoshyants or the coming saviour-prophets can fail to see their resemblance to the future Maitreya.[2]
Paul Williams claims that some Zoroastrian ideas like Saoshyant influenced the beliefs about Maitreya, such as "expectations of a heavenly helper, the need to opt for positive righteousness, the future millennium, and universal salvation".
The First Council of Nicaea was in 325 ad. This is exactly the same time Mithraism went underground (and wove itself into the original Roman Church).
In the Greco-Buddhist art of Gandhara, in the first centuries CE in northern India, Maitreya was the most popular figure to be represented, together with the Buddha Śākyamuni. In China, in the 4th–6th Centuries "Buddhist artisans used the names Shakyamuni and Maitreya interchangeably... indicating both that the distinction between the two had not yet been drawn and that their respective iconographies had not yet been firmly set"
Originally posted by SisyphusRide
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
Pope's are uncool... with their allowances and all.
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
I read, oh yeah, somewhere in the www, that there is a secret altar to Mithra somewhere in the bowels of the Vatican. BTW, the SDA church has been exposing RCC error for many years, but not in much depth. I did learn about the Waldensians from them. Theirs is an amazing story.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
I read, oh yeah, somewhere in the www, that there is a secret altar to Mithra somewhere in the bowels of the Vatican. BTW, the SDA church has been exposing RCC error for many years, but not in much depth. I did learn about the Waldensians from them. Theirs is an amazing story.
The SDA's have been infiltrated by Jesuits, the SDA Remnants are what you should be looking at. I do believe too that we should be having sabbath on the true day and not sunday but try as i might i cannot get any preachers to listen to me even though i clerly pointed out that Yeshua never changed the Sabbath and nowhere in the bible will you find that he did such a thing.