It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Druscilla
For Science to win against Religion, or Faith, Science has to use the doctrines beleifs, teachings, philosophies and every trapping of religion on religion against religion to prove it false.
Originally posted by WhoKnows100
It is not a fact that mitochondria were once free-living 'alphaproteobacteria'. Many microbiologists think it is likely that mitochondria were once free-living prokaryotes that somehow took up residence in larger cells, but this is a THEORY called "The endosymbiotic THEORY". It remains the theory to explain the fact that these mitochondria have different DNA than the 'host'.
Originally posted by rhinoceros
reply to post by lpowell0627
Scientists explain flagella like this. But this thread is not about flagella. It's not about the origin of life or the the origin of universe or even claims of irreducible complexity either. On the contrary, it's about mitochondria and the common ancestry of all animals, plants, fungi, protists, etc., a scientific fact creationists often deny on the basis of "macro evolution" being impossible. I'm arguing, that the molecular data obtained from mitochondrial genomes trashes the claim of impossibility of "macro evolution".edit on 12-4-2012 by rhinoceros because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
Originally posted by Druscilla
For Science to win against Religion, or Faith, Science has to use the doctrines beleifs, teachings, philosophies and every trapping of religion on religion against religion to prove it false.
Its amazing how this is done a consistent basis, but the religious people just close their eyes and ears and reject it.
For example, point out to any "normal" American Christian the hypocrisy of what he believes (fighting wars, the hate for the poor in this country, the love of material goods which is basically idolatry, all anti-Christian ideals) and they will actually argue with you about it why they are right. Never, have I seen one, say "Yknow, youre right...Jesus was the Prince of Peace, would he have wanted me to shoot a Muslim, or to turn the other cheek?"
They will fight and argue and scream and complain and say that you hate their beliefs and are an intolerant liberal, which is just hilariously anti-Christian in so many ways, the irony never fails to amuse me. But never once have I seen them actually change their mind.
It is easy to point out the hypocrisy of humans and their religious moral codes that in this country are basically window dressings only, but it is just as easy for the hypocrites to start screaming how all they need is their faith. I guess it matters not to them where that faith is placed.
Originally posted by Vandettas
They it explain it like this : God
Thats the only way they can.
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by Deetermined
Either way, the answers aren't coming in anyone's human lifetime.
The answer to e.g. "Do all animals, plants, and fungi share a common ancestor?" is right here, in this thread, supported by objective undeniable evidence, and it's "Yes, all animals, plants, and fungi descent from a common ancestor". It's a scientific fact. So far, no creationist has even attempted to refute the evidence put forth in the frame-work of this thread.edit on 12-4-2012 by rhinoceros because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by rhinoceros
Just another nail in the coffin of the long-dead idea that is Creationism, yet chances are we will still be hearing about how evolution is collapsing and is a theory in crisis. Such is the nature of indoctrination.
A question occurred to me when I read your thread title, how exactly do Creationists EXPLAIN anything? God commanding things to come into existence and bringing inanimate matter to life is hardly an explanation, it's magic. You'd think a book inspired by the creator of the Universe would have some level of detail, perhaps outline God's creative process and where he drew his divine inspiration. At the very least there should be an alternate explanation as to why apes and humans look the same, behave basically the same, and share so much of our DNA. Yet Genesis boils it down to God using speech to create - magic words.
So really creationism can't explain anything, at least evolution can explain some things even if it doesn't have every answer (which creationists often expect it to). This is why when creationists talk about teaching creationism in school they aren't talking about an alternative theory with actual scientific facts behind it, they're talking about denying every fact associated with evolution until magic seems like a good alternative.edit on 12-4-2012 by Titen-Sxull because: (no reason given)edit on 12-4-2012 by Titen-Sxull because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Lionhearte
Originally posted by Vandettas
They it explain it like this : God
Thats the only way they can.
Yet you explain it like this: Chance
That's the only way you can.