Discrepancies in Crop formation video showing hoaxers at work on Crop Formation??????

Did a search to see if this video has been discussed before but no matches came up.Right this video is showing apparently people in the process of constructing a complex and large crop formation,Now this crop formation was hailed a genuine unknown in the sense that a human origin was ruled out by certain experienced and esteemed crop circle researchers.

This video was filmed with night-vision cameras by convicted circlemaker Matthew Williams last summer. It is not brilliant quality, but clearly shows people making a known, huge and complex formation. It is a crop circle that was hailed as one of the best of the 2011 season and pronounced ‘genuine’ by many esteemed researchers.Does anyone have any more information on this video'I personally would like the following questions answered;


1;Does the night vision footage landscape or corn field match up with the original pictures of this formation.

2;Why does the head of the snake in the video lead to a small bush when in the older and original picture of this formation no such vegetation is there;

3;Then there is the discrepancy of the island of trees on the original picture that cannot be found where it should be in the video.

4;If the circles are spread over 11 tractor lines , so what is the width of a single tractor line bearing in mind that the entire length of the crop formation is more than 600 feet long with the curved length of the serpent measuring at over 1200 feet long so the question is how big are the people in the circles that are making the crop circles in the video.

5;In relation to the above points of discrepancies does this video need investigation for any signs of CGI manipulation or tampering.

Would appreciate any new information relating to this video,cheers in advance.

The video;

reply to post by K-PAX-PROT





Mod Note: Avoiding One-Line Post Warnings – Please Review This Link.

reply to post by K-PAX-PROT


The video is not the same as the picture, At the start you see the 3 center circles and the line connecting them. As you see it is a single line right down the middle of the circles, yet the picture shows 2 lines on either side of center from the main circles. They are not the same crop circles.

Sirric

Here's the thing with crop formations. Some people are clearly out to debunk them and others, discredit them by attempting to replicate them.

In the many years of research put into this phenomenon it's been absolutely concluded, something other than Humans are making most of these formations.

But try if they will.
Someone wants to insist that these are all man-made and we with 100% certainty know that is not correct.

It's like circulating a bunch of counterfeit 100-dollar bills then telling the people all 100-bills are no good.

So, good try!
Were far past this. We know something or someone is creating the majority of them and we're to the point of figuring out the message. Not the messenger.

This leaves me wondering if ET is going to sue Matthew Williams for copyright infringement.....

Des

reply to post by sirric


Yes i noticed that in the video that there was only one centre line emanating from the main circle,cheers for the input.

Yet more proof that so called "esteemed crop circle researchers" are either grossly incompetent, dont care or just flat out lying. You can clearly see the people making th circles in that video.

Contrary to what some people would have you believe it has never been proved that crop circles are anything but man made. Just because you personally dont know how people make crop circles does not automatically mean they HAVE to be made by aliens. That line of reasoning is just silly.

Some people come up with the argument that not all crop circles are man made because some defy explanation but thats like saying that some magicians can really do magic because you cant work out how they do their tricks. As children we might believe in magicians but as adults we realize that they are all just fooling us.

Well,well ,well, i have just came across this articule showing and highlighting very valid points of several contradictions and discrepancy"s in Matthew Williams night vision video and of his claims.Are we seeing a video of an attempted debunking of the original crop formation.



snippet from link source;

His whole story is full of anomalies. On his CMTV website he states, quote:- “Next we can take the camera and night vision unit as was used on the night to the same location as the Serpent was in and set up the same shot from roughly the same location. I think I should be able to find it quite well as I had to jump over a fence several times to go back to my car to recharge batteries and swap them over into the camera to continue the 5 hours of shooting.” The hillside he supposedly shot the film from is used to graze sheep as can be seen on Google Map. They are kept in the pasture and off the road with a continuous wire fence and there is a gate into the pasture very close to the car park where Mathew claims to have parked. Why jump over the fence when a gate was at hand ? He says he went back to his car several times.

How many times is ‘several’ must be more than two; was it three or four. How long did the recharged batteries last? He says he has five hours of video but measured via the Google Map data, his camera position is some 400 metres from his parked car so he has an 800 metre ( near half a mile) trip per battery change. How long would it take to complete a change operation and get back to his camera position? Normal walking pace is around three miles per hour so allowing for the battery swap over at the car, the hill climb, re-setting up the camera and the dark conditions, even with a torch, he would need a minimum of ten minutes per trip. Several trips would eat into his filming time, three trips would lose him half an hour, possibly more, bearing in mind that on that date there was only five and a half hours of darkness.


He says the plankers had commenced work before he arrived and he says he did not see the work completed, his story is unbelievable. To get five hours of video and do the battery changes he would have had to be at the site a minimum of five and a half hours. To be unobserved the plankers would have had to work in the dark for a considerably longer period than when Mathew was present, but this cannot have happened, the period of darkness was too short.

link; www.cropcircleconnector.com...

These guys with planks come along after any circles are made to fool everyone.
A test of a force beam or ray was made as part of the ongoing use of Teslaships.
The same thing with animals being tested and the insides being looked at for damage.

Nothing new since 1945 and the disk ship arrivals from Germany.