It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Under Arizona’s H.B. 2036, the state would recognize the start of the unborn child’s life to be the first day of its mother’s last menstrual period. The legislation is being proposed so that lawmakers can outlaw abortions on fetuses past the age of 20-weeks, but the verbiage its authors use to construct a time cycle for the baby would mean that the start of the child’s life could very well occur up to two weeks before the mother and father even ponder procreating. On page eight of the proposed amendment to H.B. 2036, lawmakers lay out the “gestational age” of the child to be “calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period of the pregnant woman,” and from there, outlaws abortion “if the probable gestational age of [the] unborn child has been determined to be at least twenty weeks.” More at EndtheLie.com - EndtheLie.com...
H.B. 2036 passed in the Arizona Senator by 20-to-10 and will soon go before the state’s House. More at EndtheLie.com - EndtheLie.com...
Originally posted by webpirate
This should make it an easy out on child support then.
What? I didn't even meet her until the following week. And I have proof.
If the child was conceived at the time the law says, it couldn't possibly be mine.....
Originally posted by facelift
reply to post by ideasarebulletproof
Wow...
Hey Arizona - if you think abortion is wrong, don't partake...
BTW: what's next - if I have a wet dream am I guilty of murder..?
And think about it, did they just make menstruation a criminal act..?
Originally posted by spyder550
When are people going to realize the teapublican mantra of no taxes, no government, was just a red herring for the social conservative agenda. It was obvious from the beginning but this is the hard proof.
Why does the right hate women???!
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by AnIntellectualRedneck
Some people are just not cut out for parenting, especially someone who views an unborn child as a parasite. You make a great fit with Prez O who said teens should not be punished with babies. I'm thinking it's the other way around, babies should not be punished with uncaring parents.
That being said, I'm guessing the law attemtps at defining a time frame of gestation based on what is known-the woman's last period, rather than an unkown, the exact time of conception. While I may not necessarily agree with this approach, that does not change my observation of people's attitudes.edit on 7-4-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by The Old American
Originally posted by spyder550
When are people going to realize the teapublican mantra of no taxes, no government, was just a red herring for the social conservative agenda. It was obvious from the beginning but this is the hard proof.
Why does the right hate women???!
Or, conversely, why does the left hate children? It goes both ways. The right doesn't have a lock on hatred.
/TOAedit on 8-4-2012 by The Old American because: (no reason given)