It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
this is comical!
you clearly don't understand what is being said in the article at all.
there was a 60ns speed skew, meaning 60ns was added to any data traveling the cord. they didn't know this, so they tightened the cable, tested it and found the skew.
they didn't know there was a 60ns skew BEFORE they tested. the tightening didn't add a further 60 ns on.
so you admit you read the article wrong and assumed a further 60ns skew that wasn't really there.
you now claim they are making up the damaged cable.
well, when you can prove that i'll gladly take a look at your evidence.
As I understand it superluminal speeds work just fine in relativity as long as the particles don't decelerate to light speed
That a LAG in the timestamp from the GPS was somehow ACCELERATED by a cable whose loose connection caused a 60 ns *LAG* in data travelling through it?
As I understand it superluminal speeds work just fine in relativity as long as the particles don't decelerate to light speed
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by circlemaker
Yeah.... that's what they keep saying, but I think they are just trying to cover their collective [snip]'s.
Time travel is forbidden by Physics, actually.
Regardless I think it's an interesting concept but more importantly it's mathematically viable. If it weren't for this neutrino mistake I might not have considered it.
Funny how you worded that. I won't nitpick though.
Because a LOOSE connection that is still passing LIGHT through the connection, is merely separated by... what... millimetres? Micrometers?
How does that turn into a 60 nanosecond delay?
Facepalm...
reread this post.
Think about how you can know the exact times in two separate locations hundreds of miles away. I explained this already.
He's already been proven wrong.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
Prove what?
That a LAG in the timestamp from the GPS was somehow ACCELERATED by a cable whose loose connection caused a 60 ns *LAG* in data travelling through it?
Don't make me *LAUGH*
IT is clear to me now, that the Title of this thread has already been proven accurate.
Yes, I am not sure how you do not understand this. The neutrinos were moving for 60ns BEFORE the GPS knew they were moving.
They therefore appeared to move 60ns faster than they actually did.
It's very simple if you don't look at the data with your mind made up and an agenda to promote.
Please tell me how the GPS thinking they left 60ns later would make them appear slower?
Maybe you can understand it if I really dumb it down for you.
I need to travel 60 miles....
Now do you see how a LAG makes the object appear to be FASTER.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
Wait... the GPS *KNEW* they were moving?
How exactly does a sattelite in space KNOW something?
Are they Sentient?
That's nice... would you like to post the schematics for the emitter and detectors of the neutrinos that apparently you MUST have to say these things with the confidence that you are displaying?
I love it when you guys pretend that you know how these things work, to promote YOUR agenda.
Please tell me how you know WHERE the "Loose Cable" was in relation to the rest of the test equipment?
Blah, Blah, Blah...
Please post the schematics of the OPERA test facility.