It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We used to debate formally a lot around here. There were rules and constraints - applied equally through the debate.... when things got heated anywhere you could defuse it by challenging someone to a debate.... that often separated the wheat from the chaff.
Originally posted by Bigfoot12714
reply to post by Maxmars
We used to debate formally a lot around here. There were rules and constraints - applied equally through the debate.... when things got heated anywhere you could defuse it by challenging someone to a debate.... that often separated the wheat from the chaff.
Why does this not happen anymore?
Originally posted by Bigfoot12714
reply to post by Maxmars
Why does this not happen anymore?
Originally posted by zarp3333
There is one fundamental flaw in your observation. Rules, laws, protocols, common decency, ethical behavior, integrity, etc have no effect on outlaws. Until such time that a mechanism is created to identify such individuals, you, my friend, are wasting your time.
None are. Opening oneself up to communications from a dedicated lout by definition exposes anyone to potential friction. How we handle that, should it arise, is the determinant of the outcome... because left to the offender; the outcome is predetermined.
To answer your question directly, I am not immune to trolls.
...my intent was not to make myself feel better or to put the offender down but to give the less informed member a truer perspective.
With the admission of the "Paid Shill," a fact was confirmed that many of us knew.
There are tools available to identify these individuals. Why not use them?
Better yet, why not encourage the use of our real names and faces?
If this is supposed to be a community, let's act accordingly.
I would never put on a mask and ask the neighbor for a cup of sugar. They'd think I was a criminal.....
Originally posted by speculativeoptimist
reply to post by Maxmars
Thank you for a well written and considerate thread Maxmars. The egos, yes we each deal with them online, a wide variety of sorts, and some are quickly defensive, whereas others seem to be able to endure most affliction without harm. It plays out in both writer and reader, but awareness of it and how it behaves helps, and is a good beginning to identify problems.
One thing that came to mind was the consideration for word choice. I use a lot of - "maybe, perhaps,
sometimes, in my opinion, one could consider, how do you feel about, agree to disagree, what do you think about" - and some other neutralistic words/phrases that seem to help keep an even keel to the corresponding, by accommodating more options for response, and preventing a matter of fact attitude being rubbed in someones face. I don't mean one should not argue/defend facts, I think they are just better served cordially sometimes. Some could consider these words flakey, but in moderation I think they serve a good purpose.
Peace,
spec
ETA: These buffer words may not be good for formal debates, but sometimes they help minimize potential animosity.edit on 4-4-2012 by speculativeoptimist because: (no reason given)
It plays out in both writer and reader, but awareness of it and how it behaves helps, and is a good beginning to identify problems.
Originally posted by jimmyx
if you do not respond to misinformation or outright lies strongly and quickly, it is percieved as true...case in point: 52% of gop voters in mississippi believe obama is a muslim
www.theblaze.com...
when something is said over and over again, and there is no strong quick rebuttle, than it is believed as being true.
people adept in the art of propaganda have known this for centuries, and use it for all types of activities.
having a "debate" on something that is patently false or untrue, gives credence to the idea that it is "unsettled"
why i'm saying this is i see this happening more and more on ATS. i have lost points responding crudely to crude remarks, while the poster that initiated the remarks is left alone.
and not only mississippi, but 45% of republican voters in alabama believe obama is a muslim
if you do not respond to misinformation or outright lies strongly and quickly, it is percieved as true...
....
The Zodeaux's all had to learn to accept responsibility for their own feelings if we were to ever survive each other. Such a thing is not easy, but somehow we survived. It is not that I don't get my feelings hurt now. I do. Indeed, sometimes my feelings hurt so much I say and do things I regret, mostly regretting I know better and have at my command more useful methods of response, but the feelings got in the way and consequences abound.