It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HandyDandy
reply to post by MrWendal
I've had to spend two nights in jail and was NEVER strip searched.
Standard procedure?
Originally posted by MrWendal
Did you spend that night or two in the booking area and in a holding cell. Or did you spend that night or to in the main facility with the general population of inmates?
Both have the potential to be places where contraband can be snuck in and used on another or oneself.
Originally posted by hooper
but the fact is any American has the potential, rightfully or not, to end up in a jail cell so its in everyone's best interest to make those place as safe as possible.
The old addage........"you must relinquish your rights for a little security".
Sorry but I can't stand that train of thought.
Originally posted by hooper
I am sure you feel you have a "right" to a safe and humane detention.
But I guess the police are supposed to only search the "other" people in the cell, not you - right?
Originally posted by hooper
I'm sorry - exactly what "right" are you relinquishing?
Originally posted by HandyDandy
What's the difference?
Both have the potential to be places where contraband can be snuck in and used on another or oneself.
I would think a holding cell full of drunks would be far more dangerous than a cell with just one or two people in it who are sober. But both have the potential for contraband.
Go ahead and call me paranoid though for showing the sleeping masses that these laws are being put in place for a reason. Just like in 1930's Germany.
You do know that everything Hitler did while in power was fully legal at the time in Germany?
edit on 4-4-2012 by HandyDandy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by HandyDandy
Originally posted by hooper
but the fact is any American has the potential, rightfully or not, to end up in a jail cell so its in everyone's best interest to make those place as safe as possible.
The old addage........"you must relinquish your rights for a little security".
Sorry but I can't stand that train of thought.
Originally posted by HandyDandy
Originally posted by hooper
I'm sorry - exactly what "right" are you relinquishing?
Unreasonable search and siezure for one.
Both of my physical body.
Originally posted by HandyDandy
Getting back to the topic.
We are talking about the SC using the traffic stop.......not detention.......of a terrorist of 9/11 as justification.
So, the whole argument about being in a holding cell vs. general population vs. traffic stop is moot from the get-go.
Originally posted by MrWendal
Not actually it is not. They mention the traffic stop, but the ruling specifically says, "Inmates". When you are stopped at a traffic stop, you are not an inmate.
The court refused to exempt minor offenders such as Florence from strip searches, stating that "[p]eople detained for minor offenses can turn out to be the most devious and dangerous criminals." As evidence for that claim, the majority invoked 9/11. "One of the terrorists involved in the September 11 attacks was stopped and ticketed for speeding just two days before hijacking Flight 93," Kennedy wrote.
Originally posted by MrWendal
When you are stopped at a traffic stop, you are not an inmate.
Then why even mention the TRAFFIC STOP of a terrorist as justification for strip searches in the first place if it is only for inmates?
Back to my original questions.........how would a strip search of the TRAFFICALLY STOPPED terrorist hinder in any way the developement of 9/11?
But Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the court, said the policy was designed in part to protect the safety of Florence and other inmates.
But having someone strip naked in front of a group of people, bend over and show their undercarriage is everybit as invasive.
There have been cases in the past women sued because not only were they subject to procedure, they found that the male cops were allowed to watch through a doorway or another room.