It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Israylite4ever
When You do find an explanation, hopefully You can all join together and help stop the turmoil going on in the Middle East because of a religious lie.
Originally posted by Israylite4ever
When You do find an explanation, hopefully You can all join together and help stop the turmoil going on in the Middle East because of a religious lie.
Originally posted by smyleegrl
What is the point of this thread? Obviously you hope to start an argument; hence your challenging and defiant tone.
Israel and Jerusalem are man-made country/ city. How does that prove anything about God?
Originally posted by smyleegrl
What is the point of this thread?
Originally posted by Israylite4ever
Originally posted by smyleegrl
What is the point of this thread? Obviously you hope to start an argument; hence your challenging and defiant tone.
Israel and Jerusalem are man-made country/ city. How does that prove anything about God?
I want details. YOU ARE COMPLETELY AVOIDING THE QUESTION BY GIVING VAGUE EXPLANATIONS. I need names and people, times and places etc because it seems RELIGOUS TEXT is the ONLY explanation of 'isreal' so far.
Originally posted by ComeFindMe
reply to post by smyleegrl
Israel and Jerusalem physically exist in the Middle East.
Fink I mite be fick but dnt get this fread
Originally posted by ComeFindMe
Originally posted by Israylite4ever
Originally posted by smyleegrl
What is the point of this thread? Obviously you hope to start an argument; hence your challenging and defiant tone.
Israel and Jerusalem are man-made country/ city. How does that prove anything about God?
I want details. YOU ARE COMPLETELY AVOIDING THE QUESTION BY GIVING VAGUE EXPLANATIONS. I need names and people, times and places etc because it seems RELIGOUS TEXT is the ONLY explanation of 'isreal' so far.
Yes She is. My question isn't vague. If the people occupying The fake "UN" created 'isreal' and Jerusalem now are there besides anything but the "religious text" they use, then they don't belong there. But it seems NO ATHEIST WANTS TO BRING THIS UP. What's the point in being an atheist and believing in "truth", if You cant point out such an obvious contradiction of reality. I wish the Atheist who thought long and hard about not believing in YHWH, would take the same amount of time to point out the contradictions of the fake UN created 'isreal' so the turmoil there might stop from people being aware of the lie.
Err no she is not. She answered your (vague) question.
I'd recommend the Israeli Yellow Pages for names, people, times and places.
Originally posted by Israylite4ever
Originally posted by smyleegrl
What is the point of this thread? Obviously you hope to start an argument; hence your challenging and defiant tone.
Israel and Jerusalem are man-made country/ city. How does that prove anything about God?
I want details. YOU ARE COMPLETELY AVOIDING THE QUESTION BY GIVING VAGUE EXPLANATIONS. I need names and people, times and places etc because it seems RELIGOUS TEXT is the ONLY explanation of 'isreal' so far.
Originally posted by stainlesssteelrat
I'll try....
Zionist wanted to have solid outpost in middle-east (not just another puppet government). The significance of oil was already very obvious.
This country is just a stick in anthill, existence of which is justified by some religious bollocks.
And clearly it serves well until this day.
edit: Im not atheist though, I believe in God Creator, but shun everything concerning organized religion of any kind.edit on 3-4-2012 by stainlesssteelrat because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hdutton
I have always thought this would be fairly easy to explain.
A long time ago there was a land deal struck between some people who really did not like each other.
One group thought they could claim not only the land they had agreed upon but more for their expanding family.
The second group did not like this, so when any opportinity presented it's self, they tried to get rid of group one.
A few hundred years later group one found they were no longer wanted where they now lived and thought they could just go back "home".
The only problem was the people who now live there don't want them either, because they are again laying claim to all the land.
The easiest way to find peace would be to either settle everyone back on the original land claim or create more land.
I am aware of just how simplistic this all sounds, but it has to be so for some here to understand what is being said.
Of course, neither of these would begin to address the past conflicts; which is another story entirely.
Originally posted by ComeFindMe
reply to post by Israylite4ever
Right, OK. Well, most countries and regions in the world have developed as such through the impact of religion on the native peoples. I'm sure many countries have at least developed geographically through the belief system/s of the indigenous population.
Whilst I appreciate the sentiment in your argument, is it not the same as criticising Republicans who live in Britain (which has a monarch)?