It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Federal court orders FDA must act to remove antibiotics from animal feed

page: 1

log in


posted on Mar, 23 2012 @ 01:26 PM

FDA must act to remove antibiotics from animal feed: judge

A federal judge on Thursday ordered U.S. regulators to start proceedings to withdraw approval for the use of common antibiotics in animal feed, citing concerns that overuse is endangering human health by creating antibiotic-resistant "superbugs".

U.S. Magistrate Judge Theodore Katz ordered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to begin proceedings unless makers of the drugs can produce evidence that their use is safe.

If they can't, then the FDA must withdraw approval for non-therapeutic use of those drugs, the judge ruled.

Any takers on whether this will actually happen?
edit on 23-3-2012 by loam because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 23 2012 @ 01:36 PM
Well I hope so! I don't want these "super bugs" in my meats...

posted on Mar, 23 2012 @ 01:40 PM
Although "GOOD FOR HIM" for the judge to make this decision, I see the FDA fighting this with money and lawyers until the decision is overturned. Gotta keep poisoning the masses.

posted on Mar, 23 2012 @ 01:50 PM
reply to post by loam

Good find, OP. And yes, I think it might go through. There has been some amount of push back lately regarding people's knowledge/control over the food supply.

Monsanto is getting creamed in the media/world markets.

Pink Slime is going the way of the dodo.

GMO food labels might become mandatory if the movement in Congress grows past the 55 members.

I heard some stuff out of PA state legislature about legal access raw milk (something about the Amish, and how the FDA and CPS can't go after them for drinking it, serving it to minors or giving it away to people... but it was a shoddy source).

And now this? Seems to me that things are looking up!

posted on May, 10 2012 @ 05:40 PM
reply to post by LennyDaRetard

Before you say that, you might want to read what's still in the food that no one really talks about.

3. The Drug Store in Your Meat

You may not have heard of Fort Dodge, Elanco, or Intervet, animal divisions of Big Pharma, but you may well be "taking" their drugs. Government safety inspectors miss residues of penicillin and other antibiotics, parasite and anti-inflammatory drugs and heavy metals in beef, says a 2010 Office of Inspector General report, allowing contaminated beef into food supply. For other toxins like dioxin, lindane and fire retardants, inspectors do not even have "established action levels" to test for. Four plants, with an astounding 211 drug residue violations, were given a pass says the OIG report. Worse, unlike germs like salmonella or E. coli, drug and metal residues aren't neutralized by cooking and can even turn into more dangerous compounds when heated.

4. "Free Antibiotics" in Food and Water

One of the late Sen. Ted Kennedy's last legislative fights was about the overuse of livestock antibiotics. "It seems scarcely believable that these precious medications could be fed by the ton to chickens and pigs," he wrote in the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act. Over 70 percent of antibiotics go to livestock, not to people, says the bill and 48 percent of national streams are tainted with antibiotics. Other reports say that almost half of Midwest hog farms harbor the antibiotic resistant germ, MRSA, and 64 percent of workers carry it. Are people who don't eat meat or drink tap water safe? Guess again. Crops themselves can harbor antibiotics, say food researcher, siphoning them right up from the soil.

5. Meat Inspection by the "Have a Cup of Coffee and Pray" Method

Once upon a time, federal meat inspectors visually examined carcasses for wholesomeness. But under the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP), implemented in 2000, inspectors now simply ratify that companies are following their own self-created systems--as in "Trust us." Soon after HACCP, 80 percent of inspectors surveyed said that HACCP limited their ability to enforce the law and the public's right to know about food safety. Almost 20 percent said they'd been told to not document violations. And 62 percent of inspectors said they allowed contamination like feces, vomit, and metal shards in food on a daily or weekly basis since HACCP. No wonder HACCP has been been dubbed "Have a Cup of Coffee and Pray."

6. A Delicacy from Hell

Foie gras is a "delicacy" that requires the indelicate force-feeding of geese and ducks to bloat their livers. Video shows birds with bloody throats, barely able to walk and struggling to breathe. Yet Big Food, restaurateurs and even the American Veterinary Medical Association defend the gratuitous cruelty lest veal crates and other extreme "production agriculture" be questioned next. Foie gras is banned in Europe and other countries but a 2007 foie gras ban in Chicago drew ridicule from the Chicago Tribune's food critic ("Has City Council finally quacked?" Will "quack-easies" surface?) and a Foie Gras Fest backlash from area chefs who served five-course foie gras meals. P.S. The ban was repealed.

7. Extreme Growth Promoters

Many of the growth promoters used in US meat production are banned in other countries. Europe boycotts US beef because of hormones like oestradiol-17 and trenbolone acetate which it says are linked to prostate and breast cancer. The EU also disallows farmers to use antibiotics and arsenic as growth promoters, which the US does. (Yes, arsenic.) Still, it is some consolation that most US growth promoters are withdrawn in the weeks before slaughter. Not so with ractopamine, an asthma-like drug given to 60 to 80 percent of US pigs, 30 percent of ration-fed cattle and an undisclosed number of turkeys. Ractopamine, which few are aware of, is given during the last weeks of life and not withdrawn before slaughter.

Let's just hope that "our" congress does something to stop a little more of this stuff. And yeah, sometimes government intervention is necessary to stop companies from trying to simply "make their products more profitable"

new topics

top topics

log in