It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON — An Afghan soldier shot to death a 22-year-old Marine at an outpost in southwestern Afghanistan last month in a previously undisclosed case of apparent Afghan treachery that marked at least the seventh killing of an American military member by his supposed ally in the past six weeks, Marine officials said.
Lance Cpl. Edward J. Dycus of Greenville, Miss., was shot in the back of the head on Feb. 1 while standing guard at an Afghan-U.S. base in the Marja district of Helmand province. The exact circumstances have not been disclosed, but the Dycus family has been notified that he was killed by an Afghan soldier. Marine officials discussed the matter on condition of anonymity because it is still under investigation.
“The Marines and soldiers that are doing the advising work out here understand that if they can’t live side by side and operate day in and day out with the Afghans, then they are not going to be able to achieve what they need to achieve as far as relationship building,” Toolan said.
Dycus’ killing happened nearly three weeks before the burning of Muslim holy books at Bagram air base, an event that American officials said was accidental but that triggered a wave of protests across Afghanistan and is linked to six other killings of American troops by Afghans.
Two U.S. soldiers were gunned down by an Afghan soldier Feb 23 in Nangahar province; an Air Force lieutenant colonel and an Army major were killed inside the Afghan government office in Kabul and two Army paratroopers were killed by Afghan soldiers in Kandahar province on March 1.
Originally posted by usmc0311
reply to post by beezzer
I completely agree
2nd
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by usmc0311
reply to post by beezzer
I completely agree
2nd
Thanks.
I don't mean to go off on a rant, but when did we get so damned squeemish about war? People die. People get hurt. It's ugly. It's not pretty or something a politician can put in a sound bite.
That part of the world is not stable. We can't approach these people with a western mindset and expect them to respond in kind.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
reply to post by beezzer
The war was over within the first couple of years, the training camps were dismantled and Al Qaeda were no longer in the country.Who are we meant to be fighting now? The Taliban?, it could go on for decades. We certainly aren't winning any hearts and minds out there and creating more and more insurgents with every mistake we make out there. I'm still waiting for a good justification for remaining there. Maybe someone can convince me?
Originally posted by Danbones
in most novels
the emeny is the invaderedit on 16-3-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by nusnus
Why is it that when I see news of American soldiers being killed by the people they invaded, I feel not one bit sorry for them?
Originally posted by beezzer
Our "war plan" is terminal. Our leaders are too concerned about hurt feelings, public opinion, winning heartsand minds than defeating the enemy.
It's frustrating. It caues resentment and a lack of mission in the people who serve.
Originally posted by beezzer
Our "war plan" is terminal. Our leaders are too concerned about hurt feelings, public opinion, winning heartsand minds than defeating the enemy.
Originally posted by beezzer
But I agree with you.
Bush screwed up. Obama screwed up. We should have just gone in, done the job, and left.
Yet we drag this out for a decade plus. . . . for what?
It frustrates me to no end.