It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
There are no volcanoes on the area of the New Madrid fault. There might have been millions of years ago, but there are none there now.
Originally posted by AnonymousCitizen
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
There are no volcanoes on the area of the New Madrid fault. There might have been millions of years ago, but there are none there now.
At the risk of splitting hairs, I would say that is not quite true.
While there may be no "active" volcanoes, there are "dormant" volcanoes in the area.
Originally posted by Deetermined
Originally posted by Blaine91555
I see someone used this as another excuse to dredge up the implausible ideas regarding the oil spill. When that was going on more junk science than on any other topic popped up here. People were posting illiterate nonsense on a scale almost unbelievable.
Please explain why the ideas are implausible. Also, using links to back up your statements would be helpful to everyone as well. Thank you.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Originally posted by Deetermined
Originally posted by Blaine91555
I see someone used this as another excuse to dredge up the implausible ideas regarding the oil spill. When that was going on more junk science than on any other topic popped up here. People were posting illiterate nonsense on a scale almost unbelievable.
Please explain why the ideas are implausible. Also, using links to back up your statements would be helpful to everyone as well. Thank you.
Already covered on many, many threads. The search feature is your friend.
Nobody needs to prove that implausible idea's, invented out of thin air and completely contrary to what is known by Geologists are implausible. The onus is upon the one making the wild claim to prove that the experts are wrong. Simple searches will provide the good information as long as you use good sites where the info is coming from qualified people.
We were seeing such madness as people who believe oil is in large voids and that the seafloor would collapse. Another was the idea that the salt domes would dissolve quickly and create a void causing a collapse. That and the worst was linking the oil spill together with imaginary volcanism.
I think the problem is most don't even bother to have basic knowledge and invent things out of thin air, then of course they fight back by saying things like prove it to divert attention away from the fact it is their idea for which there is zero evidence or proof.
I have a degree in Geology, so granted I can understand it easier than someone who has no basic schooling in the topics. I have never used the degree in the almost forty years since I received it, but on the basics my knowledge is sound.
The understanding of the New Madrid Fault may not be that advanced, but there are things that can be ruled out simply because they have no plausibility.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by Red Cloak
Good theory and the sulfur smell could be an indicator.
As to "volcanoes" however, there are none. That formed in a different manner. Plutons may be there or forming, but no volcanoes.
There are lots of good sources for info on the New Madrid Fault on credible sites. Avoid the end of the world sites and go for sites that share real science. Nobody knows if and when another large quake can hit there, nobody.
I see someone used this as another excuse to dredge up the implausible ideas regarding the oil spill. When that was going on more junk science than on any other topic popped up here. People were posting illiterate nonsense on a scale almost unbelievable.
Originally posted by openminded2011
I remember reading about this as a kid. One of the first things that happened was that the farmer smelled sulfur for a few days.