It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
State Controller John Chaing continues to uphold the California Great Seal Motto of “Eureka”, i.e., 'I have found it'. But what Chaing is finding as Controller is that California’s economy as measured by tax revenues is still tanking. Compared to last year, State tax collections for February shriveled by $1.2 billion or 22%. The deterioration is more than double the shocking $535 million reported decline for last month. The cumulative fiscal year decline is $6.1 billion or down 11% versus this period in 2011.
While California Governor Brown promises strong economic growth is just around the corner, Chaing proves that the best way for Sacramento politicians to hurt the economy and thereby generate lower tax revenue, is to have the highest tax rates in the nation.
California politicians seem delusional in their continued delusion that high taxes have not savaged the State’s economy. Each month’s disappointment is written off as due to some one-time event. .......
The more likely reason tax collections continue falling is that businesses and successful people are leaving California for the better tax rates available in more pro-business states.
Spectrum Locations Consultants recorded 254 California companies moved some or all of their work and jobs out of state in 2011, 26% more than in 2010 and five times as many as in 2009. According SLC President, Joe Vranich: the “top ten reasons companies are leaving California: 1) Poor rankings in surveys 2) More adversarial toward business 3) Uncontrollable public spending 4) Unfriendly business climate 5) Provable savings elsewhere 6) Most expensive business locations 7) Unfriendly legal environment for business 8) Worst regulatory burden 9) Severe tax treatment 10) Unprecedented energy costs.
“It’s very difficult to get those numbers,” he told me of jobs leaving California because of high taxes and regulations. The problem, he said, is that most firms don’t advertise why they quit California. And many firms that stay here expand in other states or countries. But because they keep their headquarters and other operations in California, they don’t want to antagonize local people by explaining why jobs were created elsewhere.
The exodus of known capital and jobs is the “tip of the Iceberg.” The losses are deeper than are recorded here. California is in an “economic state of emergency” that will only get worse because the state government shows no signs of being less hostile to business and because more companies will be leaving. To the degree I know about some of those companies, under Non-Disclosure Agreements there is no way I can discuss them in advance. In any event, the exodus has reached such an alarming point that California ought to declare a “state of economic emergency” just as we have emergencies resulting from floods, fires and earthquakes. Raising taxes or creating new regulations should be out of the question.
Hans Johnson, a demographer at the Public Policy Institute of California, said white women in recent decades have tended to pursue higher-education degrees and stay in the workplace, leading them to have fewer children. The white population is now "below the replacement" level, Johnson said. "They're simply not replacing themselves."
The median age among California's whites is 44, while the median age for the Hispanic population is 28, according to the study.
Read more: www.sfgate.com.../c/a/2010/06/04/MNSG1DQ1BL.DTL#ixzz1p3vkZxAz
Originally posted by beezzer
As goes California, so goes the nation.
California, Michigan, Illinois. Is anyone else seeing a trend? The attempt to over-reach by the government, be it local, state, federal is hurting everyone.
This is class warfare. They will blame the wealthy for Californias woes and not their own spending and lack of foresight.
Hate to say this, but we all "told you so".
Originally posted by jimmyx
the trend??? we are still in a recession....texas, with its "business friendly" ways is going to be 27 billion in the red for 2012.....so add texas to your non-researched tea-party bias
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by jimmyx
the trend??? we are still in a recession....texas, with its "business friendly" ways is going to be 27 billion in the red for 2012.....so add texas to your non-researched tea-party bias
You're blaming the recession on government over-spending?
Sure, I'll add Texas. Any type of government that spends more than it takes in, and adjusts by "taking more" instead of "spending less" deserves nothing less than my complete scorn.