It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Some of the cosmic rays have far higher energies than what CERN can produce:
"We've shown in this paper that if the neutrino that comes out of a pion decay were going faster than the speed of light, the pion lifetime would get longer, and the neutrino would carry a smaller fraction of the energy shared by the neutrino and the muon," Cowsik says.
"What's more," he says, "these difficulties would only increase as the pion energy increases.
"So we are saying that in the present framework of physics, superluminal neutrinos would be difficult to produce," Cowsik explains.
In addition, he says, there's an experimental check on this theoretical conclusion. The creation of neutrinos at CERN is duplicated naturally when cosmic rays hit Earth's atmosphere.
So, we still don't have a resolution to the faster than light results published last year, but this recent study points out some of the other effects that should be observed if neutrinos really are traveling faster than light, such as the lifetime and decay of pions, but these other effects which should be associated with faster than light neutrinos aren't being observed.
"IceCube has seen neutrinos with energies 10,000 times higher than those the OPERA experiment is creating," Cowsik says.."Thus, the energies of their parent pions should be correspondingly high. Simple calculations, based on the conservation of energy and momentum, dictate that the lifetimes of those pions should be too long for them ever to decay into superluminal neutrinos.
"But the observation of high-energy neutrinos by IceCube indicates that these high-energy pions do decay according to the standard ideas of physics, generating neutrinos whose speed approaches that of light but never exceeds it.
"So we are saying that in the present framework of physics, superluminal neutrinos would be difficult to produce," Cowsik explains.
I knew other studies were underway so I was expecting to see replication results...but I just haven't run across any yet.
Originally posted by EthanT
BTW, I forget which lab it was, but somebody already came back with negative results on this, confirming that neutrions were moving slower than c, for them.
Originally posted by Larryman
I see no mention in the OP's linked article, where the study ruled out the possible passage of the f-t-l neutrinos through an extra-dimensional shortcut through space-time.
Hypothesizing wormholes in the compactified space predicted by superstring theory is NOT part of this theory and - as far as I know - no one has proposed this redundant hypothesis.
Yeah but it's such a small amount over the speed of light, it seems like just a hair. Even if it was 150% the speed of light it would be more intriguing. But just 1% over the speed of light is all it takes to mess up a lot of theory.
Originally posted by Astyanax
But wouldn't it be nice if it wasn't, and objects could move FTL after all.
No doubt neutrinos have some interesting properties in any case. I mean, most of them pass right through the entire planet Earth like it's not even there...how cool is that? But if your point is that FTL neutrinos going a hair over the speed of light don't imply that we'll be visiting the Andromeda galaxy anytime soon, I'd have to agree with that.
And what a let-down if the only objects that could were... neutrinos.
A search for [Elvis lives] returns over 2 million hits but I don't find the large number of results lends any more credibility to the claim.
Originally posted by Larryman
A simple "neutrino shortcut dimension" query of Google Search returns 860,000 results. Here is one...
Now that's the right way to support an idea, by linking to a paper, but I have no idea if that paper is peer reviewed, do you?
"Neutrino Shortcuts in Spacetime"
arxiv.org...
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Now that's the right way to support an idea, by linking to a paper, but I have no idea if that paper is peer reviewed, do you?
"Neutrino Shortcuts in Spacetime"
arxiv.org...
Yes the paper in the OP doesn't qualify as proof, it just points out the inconsistencies with existing theory. But it stands to reason that if existing theory is wrong about FTL speeds, it may be wrong about other things too, so inconsistency with existing theory falls short of proof. However existing theory is based on a lot of other observations, so it won't be that easy to unravel.
Originally posted by Cosmic4life
I guess i'm in the FTL camp, i see no actual proof to negate the possibility.
Please forgive me for being slightly pedantic, but that's not really what Einstein claimed. Massive objects traveling AT light speed would have infinite mass. That's different than FTL or faster than light.
According to Einstein FTL requires infinite energy and accrues infinite mass
It's not so clear to me that something is wrong. Photons are never at rest, so they don't have a rest mass, so they don't need to have an infinite mass to travel at the speed of light. So no problem with photons.
yet we see Photons do not have infinite energy or mass, we see neutrinos approaching the speed of Photons yet they also do not have infinite energy or mass, clearly something is wrong here.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I certainly value your opinion. However I wouldn't go quite so far as to call it a peer review.
But that FTL neutrino extra-dimensional paper doesn't seem as outrageous as the peer-reviewed paper by Poplawski that says we are all living inside a black hole:
www.popsci.com...
I think he got pretty creative with his math. A little too creative, perhaps? I just don't find that idea too plausible even without doing a lot of math. It's off-topic but I posted it in reply to your point about some of the more esoteric science not necessarily being well-founded in reality, because it seems like an example of that.
Originally posted by Cosmic4life
According to Einstein FTL requires infinite energy and accrues infinite mass, yet we see Photons do not have infinite energy or mass, we see neutrinos approaching the speed of Photons yet they also do not have infinite energy or mass, clearly something is wrong here.
The only thing in the Universe that barely approaches infinite mass and energy is a black hole, yet they remain for arguments sake fairly static as they move together with the expanding space that surrounds them.