It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
reply to post by SGTSECRET
There is a video from a gas station security camera that clearly shows a nice blur that was released to the public YEARS after we were all demanding it. I'm still on the fence about the whole no plane hit the pentagon thing, but that video sure as hell doesn't provide anything to the argument.
Edit to add: Building 7 really is the smoking gun. You need look nowhere else to find enough reason to question the official story. I think all of these other questions that we are constantly asking merely muddle the intent of those of us who want truth. It would fare so much more for us if we were to demand that there be an independent investigation of how Building 7 collapsed and take it from there instead of pulling out all kinds of wild ideas and adding them to this giant conglomerate of conflicting conspiracy theories. That won't get us anywhere.
edit on 1-1-2012 by Q:1984A:1776 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SGTSECRET
reply to post by DIDtm
im completely aware of this, but how can those that think a plane DID hit explain this? they cant because its not something you can go back and forth about all day like wtc7 or thermite in the towers. theres nothing about the pentagon videos to debunk, the fact is cameras were pointed where the 'plane' hit and every other inch of the pentagon, but we cant see the footage for 'national security' reasons.
Originally posted by SGTSECRET
so many things get 'debunked' but i've never seen this one talked about. i am new to ATS though so maybe i just missed it. we all saw planes hit the towers repeatedly all day...and for weeks after on television. so clearly theres no threat to national security to see planes hitting the buildings. why is it a threat to national security for us to see the videos of the the plane hitting the pentagon? doesn't make any sense.
Originally posted by SGTSECRET
reply to post by Chemley
"why are you bringing this up now? You may get some that say xyz and others pdq. What do you think? "
ok im bringing this up because im not going to just forget about it like some people would hope. i saw people die over lies, so of course im not letting it go. as for what i think, there was no plane, if one did hit the pentagon there would have been no problems releasing a video of the event - and we wouldn't be stuck with a b.s. release years later that shows nothing
Originally posted by ZeussusZ
I thought the pictures of the pentagon before the roof collapsed showed no plane hit there or not the plane they said it was.
Originally posted by SGTSECRET
Originally posted by ZeussusZ
I thought the pictures of the pentagon before the roof collapsed showed no plane hit there or not the plane they said it was.
you are right but sadly people still dont understand. they see the pictures of the tiny pieces being carried away and hear the tv tell them a plane hit the building. in my opinion there is not enough evidence there to show that a commercial airline hit the building, but as with many other 9/11 subjects this is an ongoing debate and has been for years. the only thing that would bring the truth forward about the pentagon event is the hundreds(ish) cameras pointed at the pentagon all day every day, after that is acknowledged there is no more debate. bringing to light the unwillingness to release video evidence that we all know exists(or existed) should instantly /end any attempt of debunking the plane/pentagon story.
Originally posted by SGTSECRET
reply to post by Q:1984A:1776
trying to 'explain' what happend at the pentagon with physics and such would be a difficult way to get people to understand. explaining that its shady that we saw all the other events that day but are still sheltered from the hundreds of cams pointed at pentagon is much easier. no physics to explain, just a little common sense of 'oh yeah...you're right never really thought about it like that' see...no physics just a little brain power, but as someone already mentioned here MSM has the whole brain power thing under its thumb.
Originally posted by SGTSECRET
reply to post by Alfie1
really? wow..ok im sure its common knowledge that a government facility such as the pentagon would have video security, and definately businesses in the area had cameras also. whether it was hundreds or not the fact still remains, what happened was caught on camera somewhere which is why all the tapes were seized. are you going to substantiate your claim of the pentagon NOT having video security..or that no other cameras in the area have a view of the facility?