It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Troubling evidence : World War 3 imminent

page: 4
49
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 04:19 PM
link   
I certainly believe we're getting closer to a major nuclear event, and if there was any truth to the story that nukes were using to cause the March Japanese earthquake/tsunami, then we know that countries like Israel (if behind that event), wouldn't hesitate to use them to stop Iran's nuclear ambitions!

Additionally, the USA being they ONLY country that HAS used nukes during WWII, probably wouldn't have any qualms about using them again, if the situation called for it.

Unfortunately the Middle-East is going to FRY.



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 04:19 PM
link   
reply to post by yaluk
 


History not only often repeats itself, it often surpasses the past in every conceivable way.

For instance, just take a good long look at the KNOWN advances in weapons of war, and all related technologies, in the hands of, and under the control of all "enemy" nations.

WW3 would bring upon humanity the most devastating, effective and powerful weapons of war, and it would, by far surpass anything seen in WW2.

If you are so inclined, pray it NEVER happens.



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 04:40 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOracle
 


"Prepare for the worst, expect the best"

I like that quote but I find it very hard to follow. I am currently preparing as much as possible and have been for months so feel fairly safe in what I will do if the # does hit the fan, but I find that the more I prepare, the more I expect something bad to happen. Another thing is the more I sit around thinking about every situation that could develop today, the more depressing it is knowing how much us humans have F***ed this world up.

Inevitability is a Bi*ch.



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 05:02 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOracle
 


Check this recent ATS thread I created out.

I pretty much listed a handful of conflicts going on in the last 10 years around the world.

Of course I couldn't list them all, that would be very tiresome and difficult.
I listed as many as I could before I got tired of it.

It was 30+ examples however.

Figured it would be relevant to this topic as it shows how the global conflict is well underway.



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 05:14 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOracle
 


Let’s see here WW3 is eminent, disclosure is eminent, civil war is eminent, the second coming is eminent, ect ect ect……….



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 05:16 PM
link   
I don't think nukes will ever be used again. It is the perfect political tool nothing more. Look at the US shield on Eastern Europe and Russia now threatening to place tank divisions and ICBM's along it's western borders aimed at the US sites they even used nukes by saying "If America continues this path of destruction and warmongering, so shall we by leaving the nuclear disarmament treaty".

The USA needs to grow the F up. China and Russia aren't going to stay quiet any longer. Here's a thought dismantle your european bases and go back home. We don't want you or need you.


WW3 is beginning the rumours of war among the UN security council and arab world have never been this loud and fierce. We shall survive as always. Humans masters of adaptability. I would much prefer we didn't have a world war the 120-150 million dead in the 20th century from two world wars, multiple other wars and communism should testify to that.

Shame they cannot use all this diatribe and anger on funding space projects or better yet sorting our bloody economy out. If there should be bloodshed it should be on the zionists and the bankers. I would condone them being lined up and shot. A few hundred old men and a few thousand allies aren't going to be missed.

Shame we don't have a NWO built by us and not the elite. Imagine the black projects, secret intelligence and technology being used in everyday life and to set us up among the stars first with Luna then Mars. Like it or lump it. This world is dying faster than anticipated. There are two options for TPTB. Terraform/colonise planets or moons of our solar system which can take up to 3 centuries for habitable regions to offload population or mass extermination of human beings can be done instantly using EMP's,chemical weapons.nukes and god knows what else to bring us to managable levels and to allow nature to regrow in parts of the world.

We know what is likely to be chosen by them...


If miracles exist i think we as a species need a couple right about now.



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 05:40 PM
link   
reply to post by RomaMayLi
 


I'd also be delighted to read an article on your interpretations of the great prophet Nostradamus!

Great article OP I can only hope your for the sake of humanity that you're 'dead wrong!'



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 05:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by vistina
reply to post by TheOracle
 


Well since i know a little bit of economy and the situation in Greece i can tell you that the argument with the electricity bill tied to taxes does not hold and can not be used to support your theory. This particular argument is flawed because in this country nobody was paying any taxes so they were obliged to come up with solution to collect tax revenue. www.vanityfair.com...
As for your thinking i consider it fairly logical. Although, i think that they don;t need a world wide scale of war. Take for example the war in Libya, as pointed out by some media UK, alone, on "invested" $500million (bombs, arms etc) will earn $300 billion in contracts to repair the damage that they have done to Libya (Libya pays of course).


300 Billion does not even cover the interest on the 12 or so Trillion dollars the Us is in debt for.
Your going to need a better one than that I am afraid.
Regards, Iwinder



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 05:51 PM
link   
I don't think we are close to WW3 yet, but pressure is building. I've recommended this book before in other threads, but if you want a shock you should read Barbara Tuchman's The Proud Tower. It is a portrayal of the decade or so which preceded WW1.

The parallels with our own time are chilling.

In my opinion, all the wars which have occurred since WW1 up to and including the Vietnam War are "aftershocks" of WW1. WW1 was a big earthquake. We are still living on that political fault line and the pressure is starting to build again.

The two big tektonic plates are East and West with Russia and the US being the most important sections of those plates at this time. Fortunately, despite provocative actions by the leadership of the US, tension between these two major powers doesn't show serious levels of increase, in my opinion, largely due to Russian sangfroid coupled with patience and hard nosed practical maturity.

The US leadership is, in my opinion, afflicted with delusions of grandeur and given to all sorts of "frat house pranks" as substitutes for a foreign policy designed to produce long term stability in the world.

Maybe the current uproar from the public in the US will have an effect which will rein in this kind of adventurism.

If it does not then we will find ourselves waiting for the moment when people on the other side of the fault line are finally out of patience.



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 05:57 PM
link   
reply to post by RomaMayLi
 


Please start that thread!

I would love to read it.

What if Nostradamus came from the future, and perhaps had seen all the wars in the history books in his time.
Went back to give Humans a chance to survive what would come.



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 05:58 PM
link   
reply to post by ANOK
 


I need to correct one point - this wasn't socialist - but anarchist.



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 06:05 PM
link   
Thanks, dava6711 & Liberal Sceptic-

U2U me or leave a message on my profile if you like;

Thanks, Oracle for your patience.

I, too, hope that Michel de Notredame's predictions about WWIII don't occur- he did make his Centuries in the hopes that future people would prevent the bad times from happening, after all....

But he has altogether too often been proven right.
edit on 23-11-2011 by RomaMayLi because: spelling



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 06:25 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOracle
 


I've been a member here for a long time, and although I haven't posted in awhile and become more of a lurker, this post deserves more than a star and a flag, I'd vote you for WATS if I could.

Here's why:
This was a very original, well thought out post. It was long enough to really present some thought provoking ideas and short enough to be to the point. One thing I've learned from many years on these types of forums, especially ATS, is that you can't force-feed certain people evidence at times, no matter how valid it may be.

Posts like this, IMO, are extremely important because instead of 'force-feeding', it makes the reader want to research the ideas, then form their own opinions on the subject. It really invites healthy conversation instead of coinflip arguments.

BTW, I couldn't agree more.



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 06:31 PM
link   
Something will have to come to cover up a decade's worth of post-Sarbanes-Oxley shenanigans.

Look at when the stock market began to rally, in March of '09. Why the sudden confidence in the financial system? Mark-to-Market accounting was out, book-cooking and lying was in.

MF Global co-mingling client accounts with their own gambling money is probably the tip of the iceberg. There's massive corporate debt, goodwill accounting, earnings that always seem to 'beat expectations', share buy-backs while insiders sell...

As soon as people notice their pension funds and 401Ks have all been looted, we'll probably see our war.



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 07:18 PM
link   
Ezekiel 26:16
Then all the princes of the sea shall come down from their thrones, and lay away their robes, and put off their broidered garments: they shall clothe themselves with trembling; they shall sit upon the ground, and shall tremble at every moment, and astonished at thee.



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 07:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jessica6
As soon as people notice their pension funds and 401Ks have all been looted, we'll probably see our war.


You don't understand just how correct that you are, or maybe you do. Those who loot pensions and 401ks will be brutally dealt with. Go ahead and mess with peoples retirement and livelihood, and then see what happens. ~SheopleNation



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 10:10 PM
link   
reply to post by TheOracle
 


What makes you so sure the banks will be an invisible entity in WW3? Plenty of generals could gain a lot of power by executing a few bankers or burning down the federal reserve. Plenty of power to go around when things are like this.

Never forget that these rich individuals are barely even 200 years old in their existence. It is not something tired and tested as true. They simply are too cocky to think otherwise. There's nothing to suggest this cycle will continue another decade. There's nothing to say that someone wont play their game, cheat, and destroy the other players.



posted on Nov, 23 2011 @ 10:21 PM
link   
I'm glad this is in skunk works.

But, is anyone else complaining over the title?

Geez ATS members bother me with their lies. "Evidence"?

You feel a certain way, and that's evidence? That is what you said, "I feel..."

People will say anything to snare people into looking at their thread. Just like the MSM newspapers with their headlines.


If this is "evidence," then what the hell is evidence?



posted on Nov, 24 2011 @ 12:00 AM
link   
I don't think the economy began to have it's boost "Post WW2", It was during. Lots of jobs to those who weren't fighting and dying. And a lot of that money that went to reconstruction in Europe came from Germany and us. Another war would obviously seem like it would boost the economic crisis in this country. But however it won't. PMCs will be the ones laughing and collecting paychecks.

Let me put it this way, it you want a real war, just hire some outside help.

Much love.



posted on Nov, 24 2011 @ 12:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jessica6

I need to correct one point - this wasn't socialist - but anarchist.


Sorry, but I'm not sure what you are referring to? What is 'this'?




top topics



 
49
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join