The Truth Behind The Crystal Skulls

Originally posted by Lastone
You're so wrong about Mitchell-Hedges Skull.

You've posted an image - Anna Mitchell-Hedges and the Skull. Stop and look at the image with a clear mind.

Just look at the skull but not as a skull, as an Hologram. Clue - The front and the back ...One of the things you'll see is who made it.

It also tells you where it was made ... but that is asking you too much.

All the best.

you know what might help your case a bit more?
not being evasive.

if you cant say exactly what you mean, then most rational people will come to the conclusion that you have no idea what you are talking about.

reply to post by BohemianBrim


Thank you ... it's very kind of you Sr.

Let me help you proving me wrong.

Skull - dark and light.

Top front (dark) - Not human skull inside the skull

Top back (light) ... you figure it out ... or not.

reply to post by Lastone


ok, so i have been looking at this image for way too long ow. I even have been looking at it through a glass prism i have and the only thing i see is: from the back towards the front -a reptillian looking face/head spewing gas/smoke/venom towards the front.

best I can see, honestly. now my eyes hurt

Originally posted by Gatto
I kept wondering why they would only focus on debunking 1 skull, while there were 12 others..

What makes you think that there were only 12 others?

reply to post by Lastone


I keep staring at it too and I don't get it.

furthermore I keep stumbling upon information that only 7 have been found, who came up with all 13?
and where did 13 come from?

Originally posted by Lastone
reply to post by BohemianBrim

 

Thank you ... it's very kind of you Sr.

Let me help you proving me wrong.

Skull - dark and light.

Top front (dark) - Not human skull inside the skull

Top back (light) ... you figure it out ... or not.

yes, its made of quartz.

anything else?

Originally posted by BohemianBrim

Originally posted by Lastone
reply to post by BohemianBrim

 

Thank you ... it's very kind of you Sr.

Let me help you proving me wrong.

Skull - dark and light.

Top front (dark) - Not human skull inside the skull

Top back (light) ... you figure it out ... or not.

yes, its made of quartz.

anything else?

Yup here at ATS we deny ignorance by speaking in tounges and talking in Code,

See this... haha i know the answers but you must discover them vain of replying on ATS it should be banned!

Real straight forward, you are not the cheshire cat, you are not the sphinx, either bring some information you feel you have to the discussion or do not...

the last few threads i have been in where people have spoke in this demi-intelligent demi-philosophical manner have came out that the person who posted this crap is has infact either no information or has a mentally unstable view of the topic...


Soo i ask again, if you have information about what you feel the skull is, post your theory if you feel you can provide sources to prove it do that too!!


(new ATS motto.. Deny Ignorance and dont be a D#)


Just my thoughts though

I'll have to see when this is on Nat Geo again, was this shown recently??

If you google a lil deeper youll find she actually didnt find the skull but her father did. he let her claim the discover as a birthday present. which brought more speculation as to being a fake as far as the skulls go. cool subject. thanks for the pointer to the interesting topic.

Originally posted by 10111011
youll find she actually didnt find the skull but her father did. he let her claim the discover as a birthday present.

Actually you will find he never found it, but bought it at Sotheby's in 1943

From the Wiki entry for the crystal skulls

F. A. Mitchell-Hedges mentioned the skull only briefly in the first edition of his autobiography, Danger My Ally (1954), without specifying where or by whom it was found. He merely claimed that "it is at least 3,600 years old and according to legend it was used by the High Priest of the Maya when he was performing esoteric rites. It is said that when he willed death with the help of the skull, death invariably followed". All subsequent editions of Danger My Ally omitted mention of the skull entirely.

Sounds to me like the daughter was more of a hoaxer than here father was.