Project for a New American Century - A list of Wars since 911

I will copy paste my posts from another thread since I went off topic slightly and wanted to compile a list. So here is the new thread doing just that.


Welcome to the Project for the New American Century

Oh hey there General Wesley Clark, what was that you said?
Oh this was all laid out over a decade ago?
All of these wars were planned??



War in Sudan 2003

The Darfur Conflict[14][15] was a guerrilla conflict or civil war centered on the Darfur region of Sudan. It began in February 2003 when the Sudan Liberation Movement/Army (SLM/A) and Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) groups in Darfur took up arms, accusing the Sudanese government of oppressing non-Arab Sudanese in favor of Sudanese Arabs.

Everyone is blamed except guess who?

There are various estimates on the number of human casualties, ranging from under twenty thousand to several hundred thousand dead, from either direct combat or starvation and disease inflicted by the conflict. There have also been mass displacements and coercive migrations, forcing millions into refugee camps or over the border and creating a large humanitarian crisis and is regarded by many as a genocide.

2006 Lebanon War

was a 34-day military conflict in Lebanon, northern Israel and the Israeli-occupied territories. The principal parties were Hezbollah paramilitary forces and the Israeli military. The conflict started on 12 July 2006, and continued until a United Nations-brokered ceasefire went into effect in the morning on 14 August 2006, though it formally ended on 8 September 2006 when Israel lifted its naval blockade of Lebanon.

War in Somalia 2006 - present

The War in Somalia was an armed conflict involving largely Ethiopian and Somali Transitional Federal Government (TFG) forces and Somali troops from Puntland versus the Somali Islamist umbrella group, the Islamic Court Union (ICU), and other affiliated militias for control of the country. There is a clear connection between War in Somalia (2009–) and the War of 2006.

2011 Libyan War

fought between forces loyal to Colonel Muammar Gaddafi and those seeking to oust his government.[43][44] The war was preceded by protests in Benghazi beginning on 15 February 2011, which led to clashes with security forces that fired on the crowd.[45] The protests escalated into a rebellion that spread across the country,[46] with the forces opposing Gaddafi establishing an interim governing body, the National Transitional Council. On 16 September 2011, the National Transitional Council was recognised by the United Nations as the legal representative of Libya, replacing the Gaddafi government.

War in Iraq 2003-present

The Iraq War (or War in Iraq) began on March 20, 2003[49][50] with the invasion of Iraq by the United States under the administration of President George W. Bush and the United Kingdom under Prime Minister Tony Blair.[51] The war is also referred to as the Occupation of Iraq, the Second Gulf War, or Operation Iraqi Freedom by the US military.

War in Afghanistan 2001-present

The War in Afghanistan began on October 7, 2001,[34] as the armed forces of the United States of America, the United Kingdom and the Afghan United Front (Northern Alliance) launched Operation Enduring Freedom. The primary driver of the invasion was the September 11 attacks on the United States, with the stated goal of dismantling the Al-Qaeda terrorist organization and ending its use of Afghanistan as a base. The United States also said that it would remove the Taliban regime from power and create a viable democratic state. A decade into the war, the U.S. continues to battle a widespread Taliban insurgency, and the war has expanded into the tribal areas of neighboring Pakistan.[35]

2011 Syrian War (already started!)

The 2011 Syrian uprising is an ongoing internal conflict occurring in Syria. Protests started on 26 January 2011, and escalated into an uprising by 15 March 2011. The uprising is influenced by concurrent protests in the region, and has been described as "unprecedented."[33][34]

Let's not forget the Kyrgyzstan 2010 civil war

The clashes left some 300,000 people internally displaced and Uzbek leaders wanted the UN peacekeeping force to intervene because they did not trust the Kyrgyz forces any longer.[37] Another 100,000 refugees crossed the border into Uzbekistan.[38] Ethnic Uzbeks threatened to blow up an oil depot in Osh if they failed to get guarantees of protection.

Why would the Uzbeks threaten to blow up an oil depot?
The war just began, they want to close the US military base there in 2014, according to this nytimes article

2008 South Ossetia War

The 2008 South Ossetia War or Russo-Georgian War was an armed conflict in August 2008 between Georgia on one side, and Russia and separatist governments of South Ossetia and Abkhazia on the other.

Fatah-Hamas Conflict

began in 2006 after Hamas's legislative victories and continued, politically and sometimes militarily, until a reconciliation agreement was signed in May of 2011.

South Yemen Insurgency 2009

The South Yemen insurgency is a term used by the Yemeni government to describe the protests and attacks on government forces in southern Yemen, ongoing since 27 April 2009 on South Yemen's independence day. Although the violence has been blamed on elements within the southern secessionist movement, leaders of the group maintain that their aims of independence are to be achieved through peaceful means, and claim that attacks are from ordinary citizens in response to the government's provocative actions.

2011 Bahrain uprising

During the Arab Spring Revolutions of 2011, protestors began pouring into the Pearl Roundabout area. The protesters selected 14 February as a day of protest to coincide with the 10th anniversary of the National Action Charter.

Some of these conflicts were instigated in order to overthrow governments that would not tow the globalist agenda, and some of them were globalist backed government crackdowns on populations that wanted to revolt against corrupt governments that sold out to globalist corporate entities. Many times religions are involved, but almost always money and resources are the direct cause as it's the 'globalist wealth grab' hidden under the guise of anything except that.

Close inspection of the individual conflicts, the region's histories, economies, etc, will reveal what is really going on however.

Now, on with the list. Let's look deeper into Africa.

Chad civil war 2005-2010

2008 Invasion of Anjouan

on March 25, 2008, was an amphibious assault led by the Comoros, backed by African Union (AU) forces, including troops from Sudan, Tanzania, Senegal, along with logistical support from Libya and France.

Egypt 2011 Revolt

2011 Uganda intervention

Conflict in Kenya

Liberian Civil War
This one's very complicated, it is very likely going to erupt into the Third Civil war soon, check recent news reports.

Tuareg Rebellion 2007-9

2009 Nigerian conflict
2010 Nigerian riots

2010-11 Tunisian Revolt

Dijiboutian-Eritrean conflict

2004 France vs Ivorian conflict

Sri Lanka Civil War

The Sri Lankan Civil War was a conflict fought on the island of Sri Lanka. Beginning on July 23, 1983, there was an on-and-off insurgency against the government by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (the LTTE, also known as the Tamil Tigers), a separatist militant organization which fought to create an independent Tamil state named Tamil Eelam in the north and the east of the island. After a 26 year long military campaign, the Sri Lankan military defeated the Tamil Tigers in May 2009.[1]

This one was for sure genocide, especially in the most recent sprees of attacks by government forces on the natives just a few years ago. It's quite complex and you could spend a whole day reading about this one conflict.

Burma Revolt

Current Cambodian-Thai conflict

US operations in Philipines

Indonesian insurgencies

Islamic Revolt in China
2008 Tibet conflict

This is getting difficult to list everything.
There are all kinds of conflicts in South America I would like to get into next.

The South American - Central American Drug Wars:

Mexican Drug War

Other nations affected negatively :
Belize , Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panama, Columbia, Venezuela, Ecuador.

You could just google drug war+ any of those nations.

Now I am tired of collecting all of these links. I haven't barely covered half of the global conflict spectrum.

There are so many US or NATO bases all over the globe, and the global banking interests are involved in almost all of the conflicts.

Even China claimed that the two major conflicts that occurred there in the last few years were Western backed, although this is debatable it can easily be portrayed in that manner. There were many allegations from both sides, etc.

How can you really talk about a world on fire immersed in consistent conflicts in so many continents?
The 21st century is looking a lot like the 20th century. War war and more war.

International wars, drug wars, religious wars, civil wars, insurgencies, coups, revolt and rebellion, resource wars, etc etc.

reply to post by muzzleflash

The 21st century is looking a lot like the 20th century. War war and more war. International wars, drug wars, religious wars, civil wars, insurgencies, coups, revolt and rebellion, resource wars, etc etc.

I'm sorry, but did you expect something else ? You are also being too optimistic, this century will be even worst that the last. More people and less resources and more pressure from already unsolved issues...

I'm very pessimistic and do not expect things to get better.

Originally posted by Panic2k11
reply to post by muzzleflash

 

The 21st century is looking a lot like the 20th century. War war and more war. International wars, drug wars, religious wars, civil wars, insurgencies, coups, revolt and rebellion, resource wars, etc etc.

I'm sorry, but did you expect something else ? You are also being too optimistic, this century will be even worst that the last. More people and less resources and more pressure from already unsolved issues...

I'm very pessimistic and do not expect things to get better.

You didn't mention nuclear war, biological epidemics, our nuclear meltdowns, the mass chemical pollution, etc.

Perhaps we are both being overly optimistic?

Thankfully aliens are real. Can you say "Beam me up Scotty"?

reply to post by muzzleflash

You didn't mention nuclear war, biological epidemics, our nuclear meltdowns, the mass chemical pollution, etc.

Perhaps we are both being overly optimistic?

Thankfully aliens are real. Can you say "Beam me up Scotty"?

Oh but I do expect all that, how can I not or why would you not? You just need to understand the human nature.

Nuclear war remains inevitable until all nations criminalize the use of those weapons, I was expecting a dirty bomb (or several before a nuclear war), that depends on how the USA decides to clean its debt slate or its meddling in the Middle-East turns out. The first nation to fire a nuclear shot will be a pariah to all other nations. I would expect that Israel will take that option (not the USA directly) if things get out of hand and the nation is put on the verge of destruction.

Biological warfare or an attack has already happened (remember the anthrax) this century we will see the rise of the civil terrorism again the monetary oppressors, most like the anarchists in the past did.

We are on the verge of an environmental collapse each day puts us in line to step into an undiscovered vector of disease, the increase in population, ease of travel and the homogenization of races will be contribution factors for the destruction when that day comes.

We already live is soup of chemicals most of what we saw in the past like the DDT, and others will become more common as the need of production and the global run to the easy monetary reward continues to escalate.

What signs do you see that prompted you to have any hope?

I also do not get why people are using aliens as a new religious concept for a savior. If they in fact are here and some of the history is valid they are hostile and have already infiltrated our society. For having any change of surviving the next millennium an extreme radical change has to occur, I still do not see that happening unless we are at the verge of extinction, there are too many invested interests in keeping things as they are to permit a peaceful and ordered conversion of society and mentality.

The Project for the New American Century is not worth the paper its written on. Anyone with an ounce of understanding about Geopolitics and power shifts already know that this century 'and many after' belongs to the Chinese. The only thing the US has left is its military strength which will diminish in time as its economy falters and falls into ruin. The warning signs of a Decline in US Hegemony have been clear to see for the last 15-20 years.

Some of the conflicts you link may have had CIA backing, but the idea that they were all totally manufactured by the US is rather naive at best.

Now who were the designers of the "Project for a new american century"? It was Bill Kristol, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz etc. Keep that in mind.

What's funny is that the Americans who are bitching about the wars would likely beg for them back if they realized what the repercussions of attempting world peace would entail.

Look at what happened after the USSR broke up. Gangs took over local areas, and the mafia infiltrated high ranks within the government. It lead the way to geopolitical instabilities, that the US has been dealing with ever since.

If we attempted to reign in our military, China would dominate this century by winning the resource wars and setting bases all around the world. If neither major power tried to dominate smaller countries, their own nefarious entities would take over. If not from their own government, then from local gangs, and on, and on..

So yeah, if The US didn't have an enemy to be pissed off at and attack, then the government would have no justification to exist. If the government didn't exist, then there would likely be uncivil anarchy.

I mean, I could go on for a while about all the reasons tied into these wars, but why bother? People like to stay with inapplicable pseudo-logic that doesn't sit well with human nature.

Just realize that while the globalists stand to gain from these wars, so do the rest of us. The globalists have ideals, and their own teams a well. Our standards of living and way of life are subsidized by the suffering of countless other poor souls somewhere else in the world.

That's not going to change until people choose between their own comforts, and their conscience. Good luck with that one!

reply to post by unityemissions

What's funny is that the Americans who are bitching about the wars would likely beg for them back if they realized what the repercussions of attempting world peace would entail.

Look at what happened after the USSR broke up. Gangs took over local areas, and the mafia infiltrated high ranks within the government. It lead the way to geopolitical instabilities, that the US has been dealing with ever since.

In the USA there wouldn't and there will be no a regime change in case of collapse or fall in relevance (the USA will always be relevant if not by anything else because of its size, resources and population).

The only thing that would make the regime go critical would be a huge natural disaster (like the super volcano eruption), even a major quake in California would not cause major political disorder. Another action would be more than one dirty bomb or bio-chimerical attack in several key locations, of financial or political impact. In general any event that would make the federal government irrelevant to the well being of a majority of states.

If we attempted to reign in our military, China would dominate this century by winning the resource wars and setting bases all around the world. If neither major power tried to dominate smaller countries, their own nefarious entities would take over. If not from their own government, then from local gangs, and on, and on..

China is already posed to dominate this century and more. By not raining in the USA military or making use of it in a wise way (not as has been happening) for the benefit of long term goals and well being of all the US national citizens not specific cooperate interests, this will be a bloody century globally as clashes between rising powers and those that are decaying will engage in conflicts over resources and influence.

China position today was only possible because the USA allowed it to be. The entrance in the WTO organization for instance was a short sighted and will the unbalance caused in the world economy will has caused huge damage globally as the USA position about agricultural subsidies (and others) and failing to create a fairer global trade reality, this has also permitted China to acquire influence in Africa and for it to replace and continue the business as usual that the West has been doing for ages. This will has no benefit to the West or to the African region, most future wars will be proxy wars over those African resources.

So yeah, if The US didn't have an enemy to be pissed off at and attack, then the government would have no justification to exist. If the government didn't exist, then there would likely be uncivil anarchy.

This is a fallacy, the USA government does not depend on the military industrial complex and any dependence is self inflicted and perpetuated, they depend on the financial system that has increasingly become dependent and meshed on that industry but there is still time to act in that regard. A collapse of the federal government would not result in anarchy, each state would take over some of the responsibilities over time.

That's not going to change until people choose between their own comforts, and their conscience. Good luck with that one!

I think that the system is now so integrated that in parts it is self-sustaining and openly antagonistic to any change. Even if people wanted to change the social system they can not, it is now beyond the point of becoming aware of the implications and results of their actions. It is like a nuclear reactor out of control it will run until it blows and melts away and unless a new global order is created (not the proposed one but a more humane and fair to all peoples) there is a snow ball chance in hell that anything will change for the best.

Originally posted by Panic2k11
reply to post by unityemissions

 

So yeah, if The US didn't have an enemy to be pissed off at and attack, then the government would have no justification to exist. If the government didn't exist, then there would likely be uncivil anarchy.

This is a fallacy, the USA government does not depend on the military industrial complex and any dependence is self inflicted and perpetuated, they depend on the financial system that has increasingly become dependent and meshed on that industry but there is still time to act in that regard. A collapse of the federal government would not result in anarchy, each state would take over some of the responsibilities over time.

Uh, the MIC and the financial system are so intertwined, I don't see how any reasonable person could take the position you make. Besides, I'm not speaking in numbers and statistics only here, this is about human nature. We've got the biggest penis on the playground, and are swaying it around freaking out the women, and pissing off all the other alpha males.

I mean, just take the USD as the reserve currency status. That would never have come to be if we didn't have the dominant military force in the world. We force countries to trade commodities in USD. We do this through the MIC. WIthout the MIC, our standards of living go into the slumps based on how much debt we truly have. That's something any well informed, honest scholar would tell you.

That's not going to change until people choose between their own comforts, and their conscience. Good luck with that one!

Originally posted by Panic2k11
I think that the system is now so integrated that in parts it is self-sustaining and openly antagonistic to any change. Even if people wanted to change the social system they can not, it is now beyond the point of becoming aware of the implications and results of their actions. It is like a nuclear reactor out of control it will run until it blows and melts away and unless a new global order is created (not the proposed one but a more humane and fair to all peoples) there is a snow ball chance in hell that anything will change for the best.

Agreed. Who's going to stand up to the elite, when they have the media-spinning propaganda, and MIC behind them? Who possibly could?!

I don't think there's a way out of this mess.

The only thing preventing WWIII is MSM, a little bit of ink and public perception.

reply to post by muzzleflash


Wow quiet the list there... And it just goes on and on and on... Read an article recently talking about us military bases set up around the world just for predator drones. The article went on to say the us government could drone strike anyone in the world in less than ten hours from being issued the order. Not sure how valid it all was, but I do know one thing... I will use these things for target practice if I see one buzzing around my town. High brass steel buck shot used for goose hunting should bring one down... If not my AR-15 will surely drop it just harder to hit the little bugger.

People who are disagreeing with OP and saying the United States only has miillitary strength etc. The United States has an INFINITE MONEY supply that comes from a whole NATION of slaves. Lets see, build an infinite money supply by loaning out tons of money (you don't have) on interest to millions of people. Don't teach these people how to save money, and make them think they have to spend it (Make a consumer based society). By doing this, you constantly lend out money (you don't have), to generate revenue. When the system hiccups, print more money, bailout the banks, and continue on with inflationary prices, which leads to more loans, more revenue.. the cycle repeats.


What we have here is a super power never before seen in human history with an unlimited purchasing power and strongest technology around.

I see the ever popular project for a new american sh**storm has risen once again.

reply to post by unityemissions

Look at what happened after the USSR broke up. Gangs took over local areas, and the mafia infiltrated high ranks within the government. It lead the way to geopolitical instabilities, that the US has been dealing with ever since.

Well there's a massive piece of that puzzle you left out. When the USSR broke up, and the cold war ended, the war that completely bankrupted the USSR, they were expecting some type of humanitarian aid mission like the Marshal plan after ww2.

Nothing, zip, nada, THEN organized crime took over.

If the US, and the world, had actually stepped into help, it might not have gone that way.

As well, the Russians offered to completely dismantle their nuclear arsenal, the US ignored that offer just as it ignored the peoples plight once communism fell.