It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HillbillyHippie1
What do you think the chances are that "if" human beings were designed/engineered by some form of higher intelligence, that our designer(s) would intensionally engineer us to be unable to perceive them?
I got to thinking about the laws of robotics and how a big concern is that some day machines might turn on humans. Well, if we were designed, then wouldn't it be prudent for whomever designed us to make sure that we could not turn on them, particularly if our design required some degree of intelligence?
That said, assuming that there is a possibility for extra or interdimensional beings and/or E.T.s or even God who designed us, then wouldn't it be smart to make it so we were unable to perceive them via our natural means, or even to create us in a lower dimension so that we were unable to perceive them?
I would think, that if we, as humans, wished too, we could create AI robots which were unable to perceive our very existence, which would be a far better and safer means of ensuring they never turn on us than a simple command forbidding it. They'd be made to do work for us, but they'd never even know they were doing it for us because they'd never have the slightest clue we exist other than perhaps some notion of a higher power which brought them into being, and they would be designed to be physically unable to ever perceive us, thereby removing any chance they ever had of figuring out what was really going on.
It would be particularly prudent to redesign them to be unable to perceive your existence if you originally designed them to be able too, but you gave them commands they were supposed to be unable to violate (like don't eat that fruit over there, and don't go killing nobody) and they somehow violated those commands.
Such a scenario is interesting to think about, at the very least, and it sort of reminds one of the Matrix or even They Live, but I would think that it should be a possibility.
What do you think? Is something like this possible, and if it were or were not, then what means (if any) do you think we could use to indicate such is or is not the case?
Originally posted by IEtherianSoul9
reply to post by SuperiorEd
^ How come in Genesis 1:26, it says, "Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
Then God said, "Let US make mankind in OUR image..." Why is this plural? Shouldn't it be singular?
To answer your question, if we were indeed intelligently designed, it's probably because we are being used as a resource for some extraterrestrial species.edit on 11/16/2011 by IEtherianSoul9 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by IEtherianSoul9
reply to post by SuperiorEd
^ How come in Genesis 1:26, it says, "Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
Then God said, "Let US make mankind in OUR image..." Why is this plural? Shouldn't it be singular?
To answer your question, if we were indeed intelligently designed, it's probably because we are being used as a resource for some extraterrestrial species.edit on 11/16/2011 by IEtherianSoul9 because: (no reason given)
Elohim is plural. The Trinity is three persons of the Godhead. God is one, but three to us. We are one person, yet we are part of the Trinity.
Originally posted by brommas
Very good question, i honestly had never thought about that, but if it were so or possible, why would they create a species with the capability of communicating with each other, if they were that clever, they could make us just to perform a function could they not? so why give us speech and everything else and make us ponder such questions as this? this really is a huge question if you think about it, surely it would show a failing on their part because of all the mistakes we make and do not appear to learn from. And why make us so we can be so easily manipulated? there really are a million questions to go with this one, thanks in advance, my brain will be spinning now.
Originally posted by jyze420
its funny how you make this thread, im in a psychology of perception class, it is true, but there are ways to find your "designers" whether ergot or psilocybin or dmt all three can raise your vibration to light speed to communicate with them, that's how I perceive to see them there, all these spiritual beings are unique in their own way from what I come across off.
I mean like all plants and animals use dmt to telepathically communicate with each other who says we cannot do it too?edit on 16-11-2011 by jyze420 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by eywadevotee
Now you wouldn't want the sheep to know their shepherds were going to eventually lead them to slaughter. Imagine what would happen if the sheep knew they were going to become dinner someday. We are the food source of the immortal Gods/Aliens/Extradimensional entities.
Originally posted by jyze420
I mean like all plants and animals use dmt to telepathically communicate with each other who says we cannot do it too?edit on 16-11-2011 by jyze420 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by IEtherianSoul9
reply to post by SuperiorEd
^ How come in Genesis 1:26, it says, "Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
Then God said, "Let US make mankind in OUR image..." Why is this plural? Shouldn't it be singular?
To answer your question, if we were indeed intelligently designed, it's probably because we are being used as a resource for some extraterrestrial species.edit on 11/16/2011 by IEtherianSoul9 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by IEtherianSoul9
Then God said, "Let US make mankind in OUR image..." Why is this plural? Shouldn't it be singular?
Originally posted by IEtherianSoul9
reply to post by SuperiorEd
^ How come in Genesis 1:26, it says, "Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
Then God said, "Let US make mankind in OUR image..." Why is this plural? Shouldn't it be singular?
To answer your question, if we were indeed intelligently designed, it's probably because we are being used as a resource for some extraterrestrial species.edit on 11/16/2011 by IEtherianSoul9 because: (no reason given)