It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jude11
And America being spread out over 157 bases around the World has not enough left to protect its own borders.
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by jude11
And America being spread out over 157 bases around the World has not enough left to protect its own borders.
The US cannot take on a multi-front war with the world because it would be impossible to keep the supplies and reinforcements flowing, and the costs would be beyond measure.
Originally posted by yourmaker
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by jude11
And America being spread out over 157 bases around the World has not enough left to protect its own borders.
The US cannot take on a multi-front war with the world because it would be impossible to keep the supplies and reinforcements flowing, and the costs would be beyond measure.
For the state perhaps, but for the people running the resistance i'm not so certain, as they use limited supplies.
Think Afghanistan/Iraq insurgencies. small tactical groups split across the region, rather than one large conglomerate force that's easily tracked.
The US state would deploy small-to-medium sized tactical nuclear weapons in any event of invasion.
They would simply observe satellite intel in live tracking, and nuke the fronts.
Originally posted by lnfidel
This is interesting,and all very plausible. So many counties dislike the USA, how does one know they are not planning something. Surprising even.