It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The New Hampshire House Judiciary Committee voted 11-6 on Tuesday to advance a bill that would repeal the marriage equality law and replace it with a form of civil unions.
Governor John Lynch, a Democrat, has vowed to veto the repeal attempt.
Of course, the worst part of the bill is that it repeals marriage equality, and actually takes rights from NH citizens. But there is so much more in the bill to hate. And maybe even some to...well...laugh at.
...
Children can only be conceived naturally through copulation by heterosexual couples. Because of this biological reality, New Hampshire has a unique, distinct, and compelling interest in promoting stable and committed marital unions between opposite-sex couples so as to increase the likelihood that children will be born to and raised by both of their natural parents. No other domestic relationship presents the same level of state interest.
So not only will this bill marginalize our lesbian and gay families, but also families with single parents, childless couples, infertile couples, adoptive parents, foster parents, and loving stepparents. If your family does not look like their narrow picture of what a family is, watch out.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Calling it "marriage" is ridiculous.
The longer people keep up this mock fight of "gay marriage" the longer the state gets to wield bigotry and hate as a tool.
Originally posted by darkredfish
You get the picture. Marrige is not very important in its self, but it is a huge step either way for gay rights.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
We dont want "marriage" in some spiritual sense. We want our tax breaks for cohabitation.
We want a heterosexual civil union. No state-sanctioned bigotry or eugenic participation. Cohabiting under one roof tax benefit.
Why assume I'm trying to keep the "gay" out of marriage?
All it's missing is joint filing privileges but that is dictated by the federal government and the IRS so the state of NH doesnt have much say in that matter.
The new civil union would permit any two people older than 18 to enter into a contract that carries with it benefits such as hospital visitation, property and child support obligations.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
If there is a tax benefit to cohabitating I want it. So the gov can either give it to me or stop giving it to everyone else.
Whichever way you look at it government sanctioned unions are a bad thing. They started as a way to regulate breeding and they only exist today as a tax scheme.
To reiterate I'd rather none of this state sanctioned pairing exist at all.
As though every homophobe would just say "gee, the government approves so I'll just turn my hate off like a switch"?
A bipartisan group of New Hampshire residents, business owners and civic leaders announced a grass-roots campaign Thursday to stop lawmakers from repealing the state law allowing gays to marry.
Standing Up for New Hampshire Families leaders told reporters that Republican lawmakers should focus on helping businesses create jobs and not on repealing the gay marriage law that has been in effect almost two years.
...
The proposed civil unions law would be open to any two adults and would let anyone refuse to recognize the unions. It also would allow anyone to discriminate against such couples in employment, housing and public accommodations based on religious or moral beliefs.