It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
HETHER POST SHOULD TEMPORARILY SUSPEND PUBLIC SERVICES; IF A DECISION IS MADE TO DO SO, INFORM THE LOCAL AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF THIS ACTION VIA THE WARDEN NETWORK AND ADVISE DEPARTMENT OF ACTION TAKEN. WARDEN MESSAGE CAN DRAW UPON LANGUAGE AND REFER TO THE DEPARTMENT'S WORLDWIDE CAUTION PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT OF SEPTEMBER 7, 2001.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Can anyone tell me what this may mean? Does this mean the state department sent out a warning 2 days before 9/11?
HETHER POST SHOULD TEMPORARILY SUSPEND PUBLIC SERVICES; IF A DECISION IS MADE TO DO SO, INFORM THE LOCAL AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF THIS ACTION VIA THE WARDEN NETWORK AND ADVISE DEPARTMENT OF ACTION TAKEN. WARDEN MESSAGE CAN DRAW UPON LANGUAGE AND REFER TO THE DEPARTMENT'S WORLDWIDE CAUTION PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT OF SEPTEMBER 7, 2001.
Wikileaks
Worldwide Caution - Public Announcement
September 7, 2001
Over the last several months, the U.S. Government has learned that U.S.
citizens and interests abroad may be at increased risk of a terrorist action
from extremist groups. In addition, we have received unconfirmed
information that terrorist actions may be taken against U.S. military
facilities and/or establishments frequented by U.S. military personnel in
Korea and Japan. We are also concerned about information we received in May
2001 that American citizens may be the target of a terrorist threat from
extremist groups with links to Usama Bin Ladin's Al-Qaida organization. In
the past, such individuals have not distinguished between official and
civilian targets. As always, we take this information seriously. U.S.
Government facilities worldwide remain at a heightened state of alert.
U.S. citizens are urged to maintain a high level of vigilance and to take
appropriate steps to increase their security awareness to reduce their
vulnerability. Americans should maintain a low profile, vary routes and
times for all required travel, and treat mail and packages from unfamiliar
sources with suspicion. In addition, American citizens are also urged to
avoid contact with any suspicious, unfamiliar objects, and to report the
presence of the objects to local authorities. Vehicles should not be left
unattended, if at all possible, and should be kept locked at all times.
U.S. Government personnel overseas have been advised to take the same
precautions. In addition, U.S. Government facilities have and will continue
to temporarily close or suspend public services as necessary to review their
security posture and ensure its adequacy.
U.S. citizens planning to travel abroad should consult the Department of
State's Public Announcements, Travel Warnings, Consular Information Sheets,
and regional travel brochures, all of which are available at the Consular
Affairs Internet web site at travel.state.gov.... We will continue to
provide updated information should it become available. American citizens
overseas may contact the American Citizens Services unit of the nearest U.S.
Embassy or Consulate by telephone or fax for up-to-date information on
security conditions. In addition, American citizens in need of emergency
assistance should telephone the nearest U.S. Embassy or Consulate before
visiting the Embassy or Consulate.
Department of State travel information and publications are available at
Internet address: travel.state.gov.... U.S. travelers may hear
recorded information by calling the Department of State in Washington, D.C.
at 202-647-5225 from their touch-tone telephone, or receive information by
automated telefax by dialing 202-647-3000 from their fax machine.
This Public Announcement supersedes the Public Announcement - Worldwide
Caution of June 22, 2001 to inform U.S. citizens of unconfirmed threats
against U.S. military facilities, personnel and establishments frequented by
U.S. military personnel. This Public Announcement expires on December 22,
2001.
Originally posted by JudgeDeath
Apart from my spider senses tingling after Julian Assange has had "how many" televised interviews/coverage by the Main Stream Media ???
Google Julian Assange Zionist, soros, bigfoot, see what you come up with, if it's too good to be true then it normally is, Red Herrings anyone?.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
This cable talks about how the TALIBAN was willing to put Osama Bin Ladin on trail before 9/11 but the US feared it may exonerate him! It keeps getting better!
Wikileaks
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by Tahnya86
I have been looking as well, bu tno luck on UFO's yet. Be patient though, there is a lot to go through. We will find em!
reply to post by Smack
I think we just have to link what we have been told with what we find in these cables. All is not necessarily as it seems.
Like this:
WASHINGTON ANALYSTS WOULD LIKE TO COMMEND POST FOR REF, WHICH PROVIDES DETAILED INFORMATION ON SUDAN'S PROJECTIONS OF FUTURE OIL PRODUCTION IN THE COUNTRY OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS. THE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT, WHICH BROKE DOWN EXPECTED OIL PRODUCTION BY BLOCK, HELPED INFORM ANALYSTS' JUDGMENTS ABOUT SUDAN'S FUTURE REVENUE PICTURE. REF HAS BEEN CITED IN SEVERAL WRITTEN PRODUCTS ON SUDAN DELIVERED TO HIGH-LEVEL US POLICYMAKERS. ¶2. (S/REL TO USA, FVEY) WE REMAIN INTERESTED IN ANY ONGOING PLANS TO DETERMINE A WEALTH-SHARING AGREEMENT FOR THE POST-2011 PERIOD, GIVEN THE POTENTIAL FOR CONFLICT IF BOTH SIDES DISAGREE. AS TIME AND RESOURCES PERMIT, WE WOULD GREATLY APPRECIATE REPORTING ON ANY PROGRESS BEING MADE IN WEALTH-SHARING NEGOTIATIONS AND ANY CONTINGENCY MEASURES THAT MIGHT BE IN PLACE IN THE EVENT THAT AN AGREEMENT IS NOT REACHED, SUCH AS THE FOLLOWING:
Link
Why would US policymakers have an interest in Sudanese oil?
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by wcitizen
Exactly!
They didn't even have evidence after the 9/11 attacks to provide the Taliban with evidence so that they could turn him over to US custody! The Taliban was willing to give up OBL, if the US could come up with the proof.....but we never did.
The announcement of Saudi French nuclear cooperation would not reduce the value of our own PNP agreement. If the Saudis do decide to build nuclear power plants, they will no doubt build more than one of them. International cooperation in the nuclear power field could well end up divided like that given to the Saudi Navy where the Americans equip and support the Persian Gulf Fleet while the French do the same for the Red Sea Fleet. Moreover the prospects of American firms, such as GE or Westinghouse, bidding on Saudi nuclear power projects would be increased by a PNP agreement. End Comment
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
Well, how about this! American corporations such as GE and Westinghouse hold a special place in American interests in middle east nuclear technology!
The announcement of Saudi French nuclear cooperation would not reduce the value of our own PNP agreement. If the Saudis do decide to build nuclear power plants, they will no doubt build more than one of them. International cooperation in the nuclear power field could well end up divided like that given to the Saudi Navy where the Americans equip and support the Persian Gulf Fleet while the French do the same for the Red Sea Fleet. Moreover the prospects of American firms, such as GE or Westinghouse, bidding on Saudi nuclear power projects would be increased by a PNP agreement. End Comment
link
Originally posted by MysticPearl
Holy poop! The Taliban would have cooperate and handed over OBL if the US provided proof in court? Or proof to them? Wow. That's big news. Good job guys.
That also means there was a civil, open line of communication between our government and Taliban leaders, doesn't it? Why/how else would the Taliban be cooperating in that fashion?
That's what this is all boiling down to, IMO.
All lies. Hundreds of thousands of dead - Afghan civilians and US military - all sacrificed at the altar of the corporate gods, for nothing, absolutely nothing.