It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Socialism: A history of the the human dream and nightmare

page: 1

log in


posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 09:32 PM
Well, well, well. How should I write this up? What pictures and videos should I use? What sources should I use? Should I include quotes to help shape the mood on this thread? As a former Socialist I was a member of the Party for Socialism and Liberation. My views chaining in favoring capitalism and libertarian politics. I left the party and decided to support libertarian politics. Of course when I was a member the party ran on Marx-Lenin ideology. But Socialism doesn't start with Marx and doesn't end with the collapse of the Soviet Union. Reading books and browsing the internet I discovered an unknown history to Socialist philosophy and thought, practice, and learning about the origins of Socialism. I will like to share what I have learned and see what your thoughts are of my research and thread of Socialism.

A young man who isn't a socialist hasn't got a heart; an old man who is a socialist hasn't got a head.
David Lloyd George

I've always doubted that the socialists had a leg to stand on intellectually
Friedrich Hayek

Sources from How Stuff Works

Introduction to How Socialism Works

Many people wonder what heaven is like -- so many, in fact, that philosophers and scholars over the years have hypothesized about how heaven on Earth can be achieved. The term "utopia" was coined in 1515 by British writer Thomas More. Utopia describes a perfect place or society, where everyone is equal socially and economically.

The political and economic theory of socialism was created with the vision of a utopian society in mind. Contrary to other economic systems, there is no real consensus on how the ideal socialist society should function. Dozens of forms of socialism exist, all with differing ideas about economic planning, community size and many other factors. Despite the variations in socialist thought, every version advocates the benefits of cooperation among the people, steering clear of the "evils" of competition associated with capitalism.

These ideals will not be new to someone who is religious or spiritual. Picturing their ideal society or world on their faith. Christians, Jews, Muslims, and so on. Have similar views of a time when there will be peace and harmony on the Earth. For all the people and even the animals and plants will side by side and not attack one another.
Though we would have to put this action into our own hands and see how we can make this happen in our time.

True socialists advocate a completely classless society, where the government controls all means of production and distribution of goods. Socialists believe this control is necessary to eliminate competition among the people and put everyone on a level playing field. Socialism is also characterized by the absence of private property. The idea is that if everyone works, everyone will reap the same benefits and prosper equally. Therefore, everyone receives equal earnings, medical care and other necessities.

As we've learned, socialism is difficult to define because it has so many incarnations. One of the things socialists agree on is that capitalism causes oppression of the lower class. Socialists believe that due to the competitive nature of capitalism, the wealthy minority maintains control of industry, effectively driving down wages and opportunity for the working class. The main goal of socialism is to dispel class distinctions by turning over control of industry to the state. This results in a harmonious society, free of oppression and financial instability.

Many users on ATS will be reminded of the rich billionaires who are wanting to be taxed more in order of sharing their wealth with people. It sounds good but how much will this help and how can people really live a happy life full of the benefits what everything has to offer you in life.

Principles of Socialism

Some of the other forms of socialism include these goals: Guild socialism: Based in early 19th-century England, workers' guilds (similar to unions) were responsible for control and management of goods. Utopian socialism: Advocates social ownership of industry and a voluntary, nonviolent surrender of property to the state. Implemented in communities like Robert Owens' New Lanark. State socialism: State socialism allows major industries to be publicly owned and operated.

Christian socialism: Developed in England in 1948, this branch was born from the conflict between competitive industry and Christian principles. Christian socialist societies are characteristically led by religious leaders, rather than socialist groups. Anarchism: Opposes domination by the family, state, religious leaders and the wealthy. Anarchism is completely opposed to any form of repression and has been associated with some radical events, including assassinations in Italy, France and Greece. U.S. President William McKinley was assassinated by an anarchist.

Market Socialism: Often referred to as a compromise between socialism and capitalism. In this type of society, the government still owns many of the resources, but market forces determine production and demand. Government workers are also enticed with incentives to increase efficiency. Agrarianism: Form of socialism that features the equitable redistribution of land among the peasants and self-government similar to that in communal living. Agrarian ideals were popular in the rural United States well into the 1900s, although increasing government control deterred their growth.

Here are some general information different forums of Socialism.

History of Socialism

Thomas More coined the term "utopia" in 1515 in his treatise titled "Utopia," but utopian imaginings began long before his. Plato described a similar environment when he wrote the philosophical work "Republic" in 360 B.C. In 1627, Francis Bacon's "New Atlantis" advocated a more scientific approach, rooted in the scientific method. Bacon envisioned a research-institute-like society where inhabitants studied science in an effort to create a harmonious environment through their accumulation of knowledge. In addition to these landmark works, more than 40 utopian-themed novels were published from 1700 to 1850, cementing its status as a very popular ideal [source: Foner]. Because many social injustices -- such as slavery and oppression -- were running rampant, the theme was quite popular among embittered and dispirited populations.

While a French revolutionary named François Noël Babeuf is credited with the idea of doing away with private property to create equality and is often considered the first socialist, the concept wasn't popularized until the late 1700s, when the Industrial Revolution caused some drastic changes around the world.

The revolution marked a shift from agricultural societies to modern industries, in which tools were eschewed in favor of cutting-edge machinery. Factories and railways sprung up, resulting in tremendous wealth for the owners of these industries. While they profited from these changes, workers were thrown into sudden poverty due to a lack of jobs as machines began to replace human labor. Many people feared that this discrepancy in income would continue to spread, making the rich richer and the poor poorer.

As many people are aware today. Cheap labor and machinery can make a job quicker and more efficient; All under a budget that will save money for the company and owners. Of course everyone does not benefit from a business owner saving money. As a result many will lose their jobs and find a new way in supporting themselves and their families. If you are a person living anywhere around the world. Who has lost their job, home, or anything else as a result of the world's confusing economy and current labor problems. Many will be attracted in working together in their community to achieve what any business can offer them in jobs.

This fear created unrest among the working class. Poor housing, coupled with bad working conditions and slave labor (which was still rampant in the United States and other countries), contributed to the desire for a more equal society. As a result, socialist ideals quickly became popular among the impoverished workers. Communes such as Brook Farm and New Harmony began popping up in the United States and Europe. These small communities abided by socialist principles and worked to avoid the class struggles that controlled the rest of the world. New Harmony was considered a center of scientific thought and boasted the United States' first free library, public school and kindergarten.

Despite the presence of small communes and the spread of socialist thought, socialism remained largely an idea, rather than reality. Soviet dictator Vladimir Ilyich Lenin was the first leader to put socialism to the test. Though he was a communist (a branch of socialism that used militant action to overthrow the upper class and government to achieve a utopian society), Lenin implemented many socialist initiatives in the Soviet Union after his takeover in 1917. These included forced nationalization of industry and collectivization of agriculture. Lenin's programs were not profitable, and he eventually resorted to a mixed economy. Communism is sometimes referred to as revolutionary socialism for its aggressive tactics. Although there are fundamental differences between the two theories, communism and socialism both aim to eliminate class struggles by encouraging government or state control of production and distribution.

The post-World War I era saw a rise in democratic socialism in Europe. Socialist parties became active in the governments of Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium and Great Britain. Socialism also became popular in portions of Africa, Latin America and Asia.

Before we learn about Marxism and revolutionary socialist politics. I would like to share a story of a man by the name of Robert Owen. How many people here today before they learn of him. Will connect the name of socialist utopia and politics? I doubt many. Not because they are ignorant. But because the practice of revolutionary socialism has over shadow Robert Owen's own practices with Socialism before the emergence of the Soviet Union in the world. Even before the publication of the Communist Manifesto. Did we see Socialism practices in action.

One of the most famous examples of socialism in practice took place in New Lanark, Scotland. The village was founded in 1786, but it wasn't until 1800 that it became world famous as a socialist experiment of sorts.
Robert Owen was a philanthropist, successful businessman and dedicated social reformer who made his fortune during the Industrial Revolution. Known for his benevolence, Owen longed to create a village in the utopian socialist ideal. He turned the cotton mill-based town of New Lanark into a cooperative society in which everyone abided by the socialist premises of equal work, equal pay and no ownership of private property. In addition, Owens instituted progressive labor reforms: reduced work hours, safer working conditions and minimum age requirements for child labor (although he mandated age 10 as the appropriate age, which is still very young by today's standards).

Roughly 2,500 people called New Lanark home, including about 500 children whose lot in life Owen was determined to improve through education and better labor policies. In fact, in 1816, Great Britain's inaugural pre-school was opened in New Lanark. Owens' society was so successful that it generated substantial profits and attracted the world's attention -- tourists flocked to New Lanark to see what, exactly, it was like.

Owens' vision became a successful reality in New Lanark but didn't spread throughout Great Britain as he had initially hoped. In 1824, Owen decided to throw in the towel on what he considered a closed-minded environment and sailed to the United States. He purchased land in New Harmony, Indiana, where he established a commune with similar standards to New Lanark's. Owens made even more progressive strides at New Harmony by putting forth the radical idea of equal rights for women. Around the height of New Harmony's success, 15 other socialist communities sprang up. However, none stood the test of time and they all collapsed. New Harmony itself folded when one of Owens' business partners left and took the community's profits with him. In the end, Owen lost much of his personal wealth due to his forays in utopian socialism. He returned to England in 1829, where he helped establish Britain's first trade unions. Though this visionary's villages can't be considered completely successful, they certainly paved the way for labor reform around the world.

Information of Robert Owen
More information of Robert Owen
Even more information of Robert Owen
Robert Owen

Early Socialism in the United States

By the early 1900s, the disparity of wealth in the United States was growing even more obvious, and socialist ideology was on the rise. In 1874, a group of socialists formed the Workingmen's Party, later known as the Socialist Labor Party. The group advocated the reform of social abuses, labor issues and other equality concerns.

The Socialist Labor Party merged with the Social Democratic Party in 1901 to form the Socialist Party of America. By 1912, the party had more than 100,000 members. But the party's growth in the United States was massively hindered in 1917 when the government enacted the Espionage Act. The Espionage Act originated out of the government's fear of the communist way of life -- fear incited by the bloody Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, which resulted in many millions of deaths and the complete overthrow of the Russian government. The Espionage Act encouraged patriotism above all else and made it illegal to publicly oppose involvement in World War I.

Supporters of socialism became wary of associating with the controversial communist system, and the Socialist Labor Party's membership in the U.S. plummeted in the 1950s. The fear of association with socialism and communism continued through the McCarthy Era (1950 to 1954), during which Senator Joseph McCarthy fingered suspected communists. Many people feared that they'd be targets of McCarthy and kept a low profile by discontinuing their involvement with the party.

But even despite these attacks on communist and socialist ways of life, socialists still existed in the United States, often supported by respected thinkers of the time. For example, noted scholar Albert Einstein penned a paper titled "Why Socialism?" in 1949 in which he described the need for a socialist economy to eliminate the "evils" of unemployment and a competitive economy. He emphasized the need for an educational system to achieve socialist goals. And, he advocated a planned economy to ensure the livelihood of every citizen. Other famous socialists include John Lennon of Beatles fame and Susan B. Anthony, a suffragist leader.

Why socialism? By Albert Einstein

Socialism in Post-war Britain

Another example of applied socialism began just after World War II. Great Britain's storied leader during the devastating war, Prime Minister Winston Churchill, shockingly was defeated in re-election by Clement Atlee, a virtual unknown outside of Britain. Atlee was the head of the Labour Party, a democratic socialist party established in 1900, while Churchill was head of the conservative party, also known as the Tory Party. After World War II, much of Britain was fed up with healthcare concerns and labor problems, and many people didn't believe that Churchill's Tory party would effect any change. Atlee's socialist party addressed these issues by nationalizing industry and creating a free healthcare system.

Picture of Attlee

The Labour Party nationalized Britain's main industries, including coal, electricity, steel and the railways. Nationalization occurs when the state takes over the means of production and distribution. The idea is that any profits generated will then benefit the country, rather than a wealthy few. Some improvements resulted from nationalization in Britain. For example, coal miners were given paid vacation and sick leave, and their safety became a greater concern. But nationalizing industry turned out to be trickier than anyone initially thought. Industries became inefficient and unprofitable because no competition existed to motivate workers to perform better on the job.

The new government also established the National Health Service (NHS) in 1948, which provided free medical care. The system was extremely popular -- to a fault. Funds allocated for the NHS were used up quickly, having been far under budgeted. But because the program was so popular among the people, it was kept in place, despite the debt it incurred. It remains even today as the only major change implemented by Atlee's Labour Party. Unfortunately, getting medical care under this free system can be a very tedious process with a long waiting time.

Although nationalization and free healthcare aimed to help its people, Great Britain began to suffer steep inflation rates -- as high as 24 percent in 1975 -- and high unemployment rates. Welfare costs were also draining the economy. The period of December 1978 through January 1979 became known as the Winter of Discontent (an expression that originated from Shakespeare's play "Richard III"), thanks to the many members of the public sector who went on strike, including truck drivers, medical personnel and teachers. To the British people, the Labour Party seemed incapable of controlling the strikes that were affecting the public. Due to this strife, the Conservative Party came back into power when Margaret Thatcher was elected the first female prime minister in 1979.

Thatcher worked to improve the economy through reduced spending in areas like education and healthcare. Although inflation went down, unemployment continued to rise. Under Thatcher's leadership, Britain's government denationalized many important companies, starting with British Telecom. By selling it off to shareholders, the company's profitability and efficiency increased. Thatcher also reduced the power of trade unions to decrease the number of economically devastating strikes. Though many of her policies may not have been popular, Thatcher managed to resolve some dicey economic situations in Great Britain. Her election was seen as a great victory for capitalism and prompted the beginning of a capitalist revolution of sorts. Countries such as Spain and France began to steer away from socialism and suddenly, the world's socialist population began to shift. While at the end of the 1970s, socialist and communist regimes were in control of 60 percent of the world's population, things were changing --fast

Socialism Today

Socialism suffered major setbacks due to the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union and other Eastern European states. And many other societies followed in Great Britain's footsteps and denationalized their industries. However, some socialist-inspired programs exist today. In fact, any program that calls for the redistribution of wealth can be considered socialist. For example, the tax that the United States imposes on citizens to support the welfare system, which provides aid to financially unstable citizens, can be considered a socialist program. Healthcare systems like Medicare and Medicaid fall in the same category.

Another example of a socialist program is Canada's healthcare system. Proponents of this system argue that it provides free healthcare to those who would otherwise be uninsured or underinsured. They also point to the rising cost of health care in places like the United States, which some believe is caused by profit-driven insurance companies, for-profit hospitals and pharmaceutical companies.

But the grass isn't always greener on the other side. Canada's free healthcare system often delays important medical procedures and treatments simply because it doesn't have the manpower, space and time to handle them. One highly publicized example of this untimely delay is the case of identical quadruplets born in Montana. The quadruplets had to be delivered in Great Falls because no hospital in the entirety of Canada, where their parents reside, could handle their delivery. Every hospital was at capacity at the time. Other inconveniences include the average waiting time for a standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): three months

Critics of the system insist that while the residents may not pay much up front, they seem to pay for it in terms of delayed care and poor quality of service. The system isn't even actually free -- roughly 22 percent of Canadian tax dollars are used to fund the healthcare system.

Socialist groups around the world continue to push for reform in their societies. However, they're often counteracted by critics, including the Future of Freedom Foundation, the Cato Institute and Sons of Liberty, many of whom point to what they consider to be the fatal error in socialist thought: How could any truly socialist society succeed without the incentives of profit and constraints of competition to motivate workers?

At any rate, the que­st for a purely socialist -- and for that matter, a purely capitalist -- society has eluded economists thus far. After all, the United States, considered one of the most successful capitalist economies in the world, utilizes a number of socialist-inspired programs to help its financially encumbered citizens. For the time being, at least, it seems that mixed economies, featuring both socialist and capitalist elements, are much more realistic.

Reading the last sentence I'm reminded of China's (PRC) market reforms and it's current mixed economic system. Yes, China is growing at a tremendous rate. But how can we be sure China will teach the world in it's current economic and political government.

Economy of the People's Republic of China
Government in China
China economy: A mixed performance
Mixed economy forges ahead in China
The Chinese economy
Can China save the world's economy
The Economist: Chinese economy
Business exchange: Chinese economy
Many of the links discuss China's current economy after the market reforms by Deng Xiaoping. If I can find more sources of the economy before the market reforms and when Maoism was still a huge part of the People's Republic of China. Hopefully you will notice I used most of the sources of text from How Stuff Works. It gives a fair and decent view of Socialism and a lot the practices I wanted to present. I couldn't demonize socialism or make it look like the only choice for people. Before I started on the thread I wanted to go over Nazism and the failure of Communist politics in the Soviet Union and other countries. But I thought this would be better then rambling. Tell me what you think of my thread. If you're socialist or capitalist or whatever. I would like to hear feedback about my thread. Hopefully I presented new information of socialism that you never knew of before.

edit on 26-8-2011 by ManOfGod267 because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 09:55 PM
Great thread! S&F for your work

My boss and I have many conversations that end up in talking about socialism. He says he is a socialist "on paper". In which he believes socialism is the way to do thing where everyone does what they can to benifit the whole. The problem is how to still have some semblance of an economy, while still having people do jobs that are "less than desirable".with out them b**ching about it. Its funny how the the idea of everyone working together, (socialism) is now a dirty word you dont dare even whisper. But anyway...after much deep thinking I finally came up with a way for the utopian society to become reality. It would actually work if we could find a way to implament it.

The answer is in the thread in my signature. check it out, tell me what you think.

edit on 26-8-2011 by Talltexxxan because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 10:02 PM
capitalism is good for the top 2%. socialsim works better for the other 98%

exhibit A - the stockholm syndrome part 1

exhibit B

posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 10:22 PM
Excellent work, s&f.

I truely believe that society is going the wrong way.

If a mixed system works best why not just have an.equal balance of both systems.

A purely socialist system with capitolist framework instead of the other way around.

An equal balance of the two.

I find we are too heavy on one but light on the other. Each situation in society differs too much causing inefficiencies. A meticulous audit and reform of the entire system is what is needed. More checks and balances so that neither capitolists or socialists can fully sway the direction of society.

posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 10:54 PM
reply to post by metaldemon2000

Thanks. I do favor a mixed economy like China. But there are politics in everything. We would have a very different forum of government which could influence the support of mixed economic system in China.

posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 10:54 PM
reply to post by syrinx high priest

I would have to check out your videos.
Care to explain what the videos you linked. To get a clearer pictures for other members.

posted on Aug, 26 2011 @ 10:55 PM
reply to post by Talltexxxan

Thanks! I will have to check your thread.
Second line.

posted on Aug, 27 2011 @ 08:09 AM

Originally posted by ManOfGod267
reply to post by syrinx high priest

I would have to check out your videos.
Care to explain what the videos you linked. To get a clearer pictures for other members.

sure. they are from the daily show. they are chock full of snarky sarcasm, but the point is made that in a socialist system, the quality of like can be quite good for the people. they visit the apartment of a celebrity, and it is very modest, and they make the point that what you give up is the chance to live like fitty cent, but you can get your kid braces and send them to college

that would work for me !

I also find it interesting that socialist and communist gov't are lending money to broke capitalist gov'ts......

posted on Aug, 27 2011 @ 09:02 AM
I have a hard time wrapping my head around the logic of socialist and communist.

I don't understand how people can be in favor of government control of everything, while they simultaneously complain how the "rich" constantly rape the country.

Do any of you ever look at the net worth of the people in governments across the world? I bet if you did you would see that most politicians are rich.

It doesn't make any sense what-so-ever. Instead of the wealth going to private hands where if you can run a corporation out of business you want the wealth going to the government where they will put a gun to your head and tell you what to buy and what not to buy.

And for the poster that made the comment about how socialist and communist governments aren't lending money to bailout capitalist governments, is because in case you haven't looked, those countries are worse off than even the US is.

What is even more mind twisting is the fact that we have decades of data and failed countries to prove the failure of socialism. Actually we are going through the stages of another failed socialist experiment. How long is it going to take people to learn that socialism doesn't work large scale?

Also all of China's growth in last few decades can all be attributed to Capitalism. And because of capitalism their citizens are able to live better lives.

posted on Aug, 27 2011 @ 10:12 AM
reply to post by ManOfGod267

Excellent job, especially for the information on Robert Owen who is a historical figure I have never heard of and will do some research about - one of the best things about ATS is finding things out through the work of others, things that are interesting and important that you would likely not learn of through other sources.

I think to complete the picture you need to consider the enforcement tactics of the various forms of government. Socialist societies can not work with a significant portion of the population deciding to remain idle. History shows how many socialist societies have dealt with those folks, gualgs and forced work camps are two examples. The "jackboot" phrase comes not from capitalist societies but rather socialist ones, hence some discussion on how the state "manages" the people is interesting. While the working poor may fare better in a socialist system, the idle poor certainly do not. The idle tend to be dealt with with extreme harshness.

The evolution of leadership is another key element. Socialist societies have typically evolved into class based societies, with those working for the government living a significantly better life than those who do not. Russia was a classic example of this and China has that model today. Ultimately socialist societies evolve into three categories of people, all who, despite the underlying philosophy are treated different. Those in the government, those with skills and those without skills (laborers). Absent a democratic process and an open one, socialism is destined to devolve into corruption, as it has in the past. The Chinese have had a distinct class structure for decades. The notion that everyone contributes equally to society is a canard. They all may contribute, but they are certainly not treated the same, live the same lifestyle, have the same access to luxury items, have less oppression.

Socialism has not worked in a large complex society, largely due to the fact that absent a mandated forced culture, aka China, the disparities amongst ethnic groups create great differences in contribution that lead to internal friction and strife. That can only be managed by the government, either through the further restriction of both freedom of expression and association. Those were strategies used by both Stalin and Mao and ultimately when those failed to work, they achieved some level of harmony through brutal violence.

In theory it may sound great to some, but in practice, in large societies socialism has always lead to human tragedy. One might argue that capitalist societies suffer greater tragedy. I guess it depends on how you define tragedy.

top topics


log in