It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maslo
Humans should have no more rights than other sentient animals. The whole idea of "human" rights is no better than racism, nothing more.
That said, one can argue this was killing in self-defense, and thus justified, because the bear is potentialy dangerous animal, and it was in close proximity to the man and his multiple children.
Would the father have the right to shoot a human mother and her two children if he felt they were a threat?
Humans have more rights, period.
Not sure Did this guy even try calling a ranger first? They will trap and move a nusience animal. The bears going after pigs??? says who? Bears rarly kill ((hunt ))) Welll these bears lol poler are different.
another thing Bears DEFINITELY don't teach hunting to there cubs .
More then likly the bears were attracted to the FEED TROUGH not the pigs.
So this is how it should work bear comes on property is NO emeadit threat to any one. ...
In the Canadian Rockies, brown (grizzly) bears are quite carnivorous, hunting mountain sheep and goats, elk and moose, and even Ursus americanus - American black bear. (B147) wildpro.twycrosszoo.org...
Originally posted by kro32
Genesis 1:26 New International Version
Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth,"
Don't see God mentioning equal rights for animals in there.
...Ultimately, cattle is the same word as chattel (13th c.), and when it first entered English it had the same meaning, ‘property’....Its ultimate source is medieval Latin capitāle ‘property’, which came to English via Old French chatel as chattel and via Anglo-Norman catel as cattle. Capitāle itself goes back to classical Latin capitālis (from caput ‘head’), from which English gets capital. www.word-origins.com...
Originally posted by crimvelvet
What always mystifies me is that very few see the trap in "Animal Rights"
Just in reading this thread you can see how people now are thinking of human rights and animal rights as being equal.
Now follow that line of reasoning. If ANIMALS have the same rights as humans then THAT MAKES HUMANS NOTHING MORE THAN CATTLE.
...Ultimately, cattle is the same word as chattel (13th c.), and when it first entered English it had the same meaning, ‘property’....Its ultimate source is medieval Latin capitāle ‘property’, which came to English via Old French chatel as chattel and via Anglo-Norman catel as cattle. Capitāle itself goes back to classical Latin capitālis (from caput ‘head’), from which English gets capital. www.word-origins.com...
I am sure the elite are laughing their rears off at the naive "Animal Rights" activists who are so diligently campaigning to move humans back into the category of slave.
If you don't have the right to own property,you are property!
Too bad that simple concept never seems to make it into peoples heads.
I know, right?
I think too many people are distracted from reality to properly understand the implications of their 'just" ideals.
...A Nebraska farm girl who went on to a globetrotting career as a derivatives trader for Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500) and then as a hedge fund executive in London, Warner, 45, is back on the farm pursuing what she believes is a huge moneymaking opportunity. Two years ago Warner launched an investment firm, called Chess Ag Full Harvest Partners, with a fairly simple underlying strategy: Buy undervalued farmland in the U.S. and profit from the coming global agriculture boom.
Last June she closed her first fund with $30 million from wealthy individuals and institutional investors such as the pension fund of Dow Chemical (DOW, Fortune 500). (See correction, below.) She says her ultimate goal is to take the company public as the first farmland-only real estate investment trust in the U.S. "The returns in agriculture haven't looked sexy for a long time, but I think that's about to change," she says...
I must use uncommon sense from now on!
I must use uncommon sense from now on!
I must use uncommon sense from now on!