It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Originally posted by Pervius
The UK will NOT be forking out 1,000,000 for the Chinooks.
The US Military Budget has part of it used to loan other countries money to buy our military crap.
And England will only pay payments on those helicopters under that Foreign Military Sales Program. At the rate the US dollar is losing value, the UK will likely end up only paying 200,000£ for the Chinooks. There is always a clause in those deals that England can sell those Chinooks back to the US....and they'd end up getting more money back than they paid.
Maybe that's the plan.
Or maybe that is just wishful thinking on your part.
Originally posted by DSSONE
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Originally posted by Pervius
The UK will NOT be forking out 1,000,000 for the Chinooks.
The US Military Budget has part of it used to loan other countries money to buy our military crap.
And England will only pay payments on those helicopters under that Foreign Military Sales Program. At the rate the US dollar is losing value, the UK will likely end up only paying 200,000£ for the Chinooks. There is always a clause in those deals that England can sell those Chinooks back to the US....and they'd end up getting more money back than they paid.
Maybe that's the plan.
Or maybe that is just wishful thinking on your part.
So what if we are spending the money on our own military?
Surely it is better than spending 1bn on some misguided health fad (ie. eat vegetables lol) or a doomed to fail 'integrate' for migrants policy (ie. hot air talking shop)?
You cannot complain when the govt funds the military, or can you?
Originally posted by DSSONE
reply to post by JennaDarling
I was trying to juxtapose the spending on military with the kind of spending that we could really survive without (and, yes, incidentally that is the kind of spending that our previous Labour govt favoured). Do you not remember all the moaning about Labour underfunding the military? The deaths of soldiers that would have been avoided if they had the correct kit. So our current government starts on the road to makes amends, and at the same time (think riots) tells the rest of society to grow up and take responsibility, and I think it's a better use of my tax receipts than helping low-life live free.
Originally posted by DSSONE
reply to post by JennaDarling
I was trying to juxtapose the spending on military with the kind of spending that we could really survive without (and, yes, incidentally that is the kind of spending that our previous Labour govt favoured). Do you not remember all the moaning about Labour underfunding the military? The deaths of soldiers that would have been avoided if they had the correct kit. So our current government starts on the road to makes amends, and at the same time (think riots) tells the rest of society to grow up and take responsibility, and I think it's a better use of my tax receipts than helping low-life live free.
Originally posted by DSSONE
reply to post by JennaDarling
My last post...you clearly have some fans here who will agree with you, hence the instant stars you are receiving. But I happen to think you are just naive. I prefer to debate within the constraints what we have right now (and that is not the idealistic JennaWorld... and it includes having a military. We will always have a military so get used to it.
Originally posted by loves a conspiricy
www.publications.parliament.uk...
There is evidence to prove Chinooks arent very safe
I agree with most of what she said...i gave her stars Am i a troll?? lol
Money could be better spent elsewhere, if we didnt keep invading countries we wouldnt need a huge army.
EDIT: Id just like to add most Brits despise what our leaders are doing military wise, we dont want to go to war, we dont want to see 18 year old kids coming home in coffins....the only people agree that we should continue are the people in the forcesedit on 22-8-2011 by loves a conspiricy because: (no reason given)