It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by guessing
I wonder if that meteorite was actually the the one that made life on earth.
that would be interesting
Originally posted by guessing
I wonder if that meteorite was actually the the one that made life on earth.
that would be interesting
Originally posted by Misterlondon
Also common theory suggests we evolved, there is no evidence or claims outside the alternative community which states life on earth started from a meteorite landing on earth..
Originally posted by LexiconV
How small is this lump of creation? Wonders why they didn't take a core sample years earlier.. pretty sure the internals would have not had any contamination.
Thirdly, the team found these nucleobases -- both the biological and non-biological ones -- were produced in a completely non-biological reaction. "In the lab, an identical suite of nucleobases and nucleobase analogs were generated in non-biological chemical reactions containing hydrogen cyanide, ammonia, and water. This provides a plausible mechanism for their synthesis in the asteroid parent bodies, and supports the notion that they are extraterrestrial," says Callahan.
Originally posted by Krusty the Klown
Originally posted by Misterlondon
Also common theory suggests we evolved, there is no evidence or claims outside the alternative community which states life on earth started from a meteorite landing on earth..
That's not quite accurate Misterlondon.
There is a theory called Pan-spermia which advocates exactly that, the theory is around 50 years old now and it is well known in the space sciences. I can't remember the scientist's name who came up with it but I will find out.
I remember learning about this in high school in the 80's.