It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Erno86
Since there are "billions upon billions," of stars in our Universe, and since the amount of stardust atoms in the human body is 93%- Who's too say, that there is not any "intelligent," life besides Earth in our Universe.
Originally posted by BillyBoBBizWorth
I dont know if that was directed at me or not.I'll repsond anyways,ive never used the size of universe as a argument,thats just what i believe,it sounds logical to me,obviously not for you though.
Thats fine,theres nothing wrong with that,i do understand what your saying though and it sounds just as logical as to what ive said,but neither are proved.
I may be wrong,but im throwing in with the universe.
Originally posted by Blue Shift
Originally posted by Erno86
Since there are "billions upon billions," of stars in our Universe, and since the amount of stardust atoms in the human body is 93%- Who's too say, that there is not any "intelligent," life besides Earth in our Universe.
Nobody can prove a negative. But until you know how all that stardust managed to randomly or magically cobble itself together to create a living creature with a point of view and a motivation to live, then you has no idea how common it is, and you can't assume it happened anywhere but here. After all, stars are made of 100% stardust. But they're not alive.
Originally posted by MyCigs
Oh I have a great answer for this and it comes from my crazy super Christian Aunt.
She told me that there is no way that there is other intelligent life in the Universe because there is no record of God creating any other than us.
I really felt like slapping her but I held back haha.
So I gave her the facts and said "Look the Universe is roughly 13 billion years old and yet the Earth is only about 4 billions years old. There's a huge gap of time and a huge gap of space that allows for the possibility of there being other life. The Earth is a newborn baby compared to what is out there. So if, well most likely there is other intelligent beings out there, they will be way smarter than us.....again most likely."
Then she rolled her eyes and called me a sinner. Oh I love when she visits.....
Logic isn't a matter of opinion.
Originally posted by PW229
I think the question should take two parts. 1: Has life developed on other worlds? 2: Has that life become intelligent enough to question its place in the universe?
On question one I would say absolutely. Blue Shift made a succint point in stating that the size argument is flawed, a better basis for debate is time. Has the universe been around long enough for life to have "broken out" on other planets and here I would say, "yes." The Earth formed 4.5 billion years ago and life was on the go a "mere" 700 million years later.
As for question two. Now we run into all sorts of problems and if there is intelligent life out there it is exceedingly rare. So rare that humanity may go its entire existence without ever meeting another intelligent race. If we look at the Earth as an example it may be a bit hard to believe but the Earth is incredibly hostile to life. Our planet has made at least 5 valiant attempts to rid itself of life (source below) and it's a certainty it will try again (no, NOT in bloody 2012!!). If it succeeds in bringing down humanity then the only intelligent life in the known universe would have survived for a period equivalent to the snap of a twig in the universe time-line.
S+F for asking the question.
Sources:
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by PW229
2: Has that life become intelligent enough to question its place in the universe?
Originally posted by Zeer0
reply to post by Titen-Sxull
I agree with you for the most part but some things people have seen and reported are things that break the Laws of Physics and we dont have that Technology yet. I dont care how much you argue we dont have it. Traveling miles in only seconds is something we cannot ascertain yet.
Traveling miles in only seconds is something we cannot ascertain yet.
P.S. -- And for the record, the size argument is a bad one. Just because something is big doesn't mean anything. If I find a marble in a box, and I have no idea how it got there, why would I assume that if I had a bigger box there would be another marble in it? Makes no sense