It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I have no reason to disagree with what all the debunkers here have said BUT they all seem to ignore certain crucial points.
Like, the gov't says it's just a comet
So then deal with the question, IF it were an object that was going to collide with earth and take out a country or two, do you really think the gov't would tell us and if not then how can anything the gov't says be considered relevant?
And second, what about all the photos coming in showing unusual astronomical bodies in the sky?
Every one is a hoax, camera flare, light reflecting off geese bellies or failure to recognize the planet Venus?
Originally posted by Puck 22
I have no reason to disagree with what all the debunkers here have said BUT they all seem to ignore certain crucial points.
Like, the gov't says it's just a comet
So then deal with the question, IF it were an object that was going to collide with earth and take out a country or two, do you really think the gov't would tell us and if not then how can anything the gov't says be considered relevant?
And second, what about all the photos coming in showing unusual astronomical bodies in the sky?
Every one is a hoax, camera flare, light reflecting off geese bellies or failure to recognize the planet Venus?
Wouldn't such a statement basically put you on a par with those who deny the possibility of UFOs being other than natural phenomena and most of those people have very little credibility so why should those using the same excuse for strange planetary bodies be viewed as more credible?
Basically I see no support for your view that does not translate into we should believe it because YOU said so and you know it is right because your mother/gov't/teacher said so.
Hmmmmm. I'm going to have to think on that a bit.
Originally posted by flexy123
Originally posted by LightAssassin
reply to post by smithjustinb
The only issue now is the 'Weird' coincidence of 3 larger-than-normal earthquakes appearing when the Comet, Elenin and Sun move in the vicinity of alignment 3 times.
And please do not bother convincing me otherwise. Only thing that will convince me is after the Sept 24 - 28 alignment....and of course, passing through the tail.
American Indians dont speak of a Blood Red moon (which has already happened) and a Blue star falling for nothing. Nor does the Mayans and just about every other historic civilization.edit on 22-7-2011 by LightAssassin because: (no reason given)
American Indians, Hopi, Maya etc. have their right to have their religion, spiritualism and predictions.
However, the "coincidence" of a so called alignment of the comet/planets and Earthquakes only exist in your own head - and you just use fragments of other culture's religions, spiritualism, legends etc. to use it to fabricate a reality for you - no matter how far fetched the relationships may be, as long as it fits "somehow" into your own belief system. (Or what you were taught by other people sharing the same, twisted belief system)
(In other words: If you look long enough, you can find "evidence" for your pure fictional theories in almost any predictions and religions..giving you alleged "proof" that what you think must be true)
Fact is, that from an astronomical point of view (even from an *astrological!* ) a 5km large piece of ice/dirt in about the same distance to Earth as Venus has ZERO relevance - with gravitational forces which are a BILLION times smaller than the moon etc.
"Alignments" are common..planets and bigger bodies in our solar system align "all the time", so to speak..a few decades ago there was a similar doomsday prophecy because as far as i remember a bunch of/ALL planets were "aligned" many years ago - needless to say nothing happened despite people "predicting" that a major catastrophe would happen.
You might also be surprised that "passing through the tail" is something very normal, we did already many times with comets which are FAR bigger than Elenin. (Passing through a comet's tail/remnants is the reason we have meteor showers, by the way). There is no significant particle density in a comet's tail, let alone that it poses a thread of any any kind. (I think it was yesterday that i read that a comet's tail's density is only marginally larger than the vacuum of Space..but as said its not relevant since we pass through such remnants all the time, we get bombarded by 40.000 pieces of space "debris" every day, majority burns up in the atmosphere tho)
Earthquakes do NOT happen because planets align or comets arrive but because of tectonic movement and comets, Moon, Venus etc. have nothing to do with it. What is there to convince?
edit on 23-7-2011 by flexy123 because: (no reason given)
I have to laugh, everyone talks about things outside of this planet like they have 100% certain knowledge of how everything operates in this universe when the TRUTH is the EXACT OPPOSITE
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by LightAssassin
I have to laugh, everyone talks about things outside of this planet like they have 100% certain knowledge of how everything operates in this universe when the TRUTH is the EXACT OPPOSITE
So... you know the truth, and everyone else is wrong. How is it that you are the only one who knows the truth, exactly?
I have to laugh, everyone talks about things outside of this planet like they have 100% certain knowledge of how everything operates in this universe when the TRUTH is the EXACT OPPOSITE SO STOP TALKING LIKE YOU KNOW EVERYTHING WHEN 'WE AS A SPECIES' CLEARLY DO NOT. WHAT IF THE RELATIONSHIP TO THE SUN AND EARTH IS SOMEHOW DIFFERENT WITH THIS COMET SOMETHING NOT EXPERIENCED IN, OH LET ME THINK, 10,000 ODD YEARS
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Science isn't wrong. Speculation usually is.
Originally posted by 20COMEtMYanELENINe11
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Science isn't wrong. Speculation usually is.
Lol science isnt wrong? dude how many times have scientific theories been disproven. Do you really think that in 100 years they wont have disproved all our curren theories?
Originally posted by 20COMEtMYanELENINe11
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Science isn't wrong. Speculation usually is.
Lol science isnt wrong? dude how many times have scientific theories been disproven. Do you really think that in 100 years they wont have disproved all our curren theories?