It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Will be interesting to see what message
a jury will send concerning this matter.
“(She) told me in a very stearn voice with quite a bit of attitude that they were not going through that X-ray,” Sabrina Birge, an airport security officer, told police.
Originally posted by Schkeptick
Did everyone miss the part where she was swearing and verbally abusive of the officials? THAT is why she was arrested - for acting crazy. The title of this is misleading
Any person who politely refused would not be arrested. They wouldn't be flying that day, but they wouldn't be arrested.
Originally posted by k21968
reply to post by Vitchilo
If she didnt want her daughter's crotch grabbed then she should have let her walk through the x-ray plain and simple. There is a fine line between standing up for something you believe in and being ridiculous. Seriously folks, I am sure if TSA wanted to grab someone's crotch for pleasure they would've chosen someone more appropriate like a 17 yr old hottie in daisy dukes. I seriously doubt a pat down consists of grabbing a crotch unless they feel something. My husband was a cop for 22 yrs. He has patted down hundreds of people and not once did he ever do it for pleasure. Get real...this is ridiculous..
Originally posted by Bixxi3
reply to post by Vitchilo
she knew what she was getting in too. If you refuse the body scanners then you get a pat down. Im not saying itsw right but when you buy that ticket your agreeing with the security measures of the airport.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
If you are too afraid to fly with 90s type security, DON'T FLY YOU WUSS.
Originally posted by 2012srb
reply to post by JibbyJedi
I knew a guy so rotten he got fired from his job as a prison guard.
Most places wouldn't hire a person like that.
Guess who he works for now?
Want really scary? He's a supervisor.
Even better please tell me where it states you have the right to occupy someone's property without complying with the owner's wishes.