posted on Jul, 12 2011 @ 12:51 AM
Originally posted by adigregorio
reply to post by jmdewey60
I already know, exactly. Just me, no extra special thing. My life taught
me how to behave, not something else. No "spirit" came down and taught me anything.
You say it is my thoughts, then why give credit to something else?
You say it is really hard to tell the difference between my own thoughts and the "spirit". Unless you can prove it is a
"spirit", logic says it is just me. I like taking credit for my achievements,
I like knowing that I learned how to "fit in" with society (IE "right" and "wrong"). You said that
I face the same judgement as Christians (I am a non), I have sufficently questioned
this. And as I predicted, my position "can't" be right, even though it is (To me, of
course.)
At least until I see some proof that I am not in control of my thoughts.
(I exist, I know I do to me. I solve
my own problems, and I will not give credit so someone, or something else.)
You did some work on this post and are making an effort to get your point across so I should go over this in greater detail.
I was saying before about you knowing and what I meant is your earlier statement that a god, if such a thing did exist would want you to do things
yourself rather than to depend on someone else. We do live an existence where we depend on things around us to sustain that existence, and that may be
what I was trying to get at. You are doing the doing to make use of what you find at hand to fill the needs of the moment. There are these things
available and they are there, to some extent, thanks to the doings of other people, such as a farmer who grows food and that food is available and you
make use of it. There is no totally self sufficient existence and we are not that type of being. We do not always stop to wonder why or how, every
single thing necessary is there. Regardless of whether we give a certain degree of regard to each of those things, they are there anyway.
You are not who you are because at some point before you were anything, you decided to design what would be nice to be, if you were to decide to come
into existence. So you would have to admit that you do not and can not have total control of yourself or the parameters under which your existence
continues or ceases to be.
The spirit may not best be described as a parallel thought process you can switch to like another channel if you so choose. It is something that is
more subtle and can not be, probably, identified at all, and so the name, spirit, which by definition can be known by its results which would indicate
that it did have an affect. The way I think of it is a plane of existence where our consciousness dwells which is not local as in only existing in one
place. This would not be the spirit itself but the realm in which the specific spirit I am talking about accesses us, the who we are that is unique
unto ourselves and is our true identity. That spirit is there and it has a quality of goodness to it and it is a resource to where the self can gain
nourishment in its endeavors of being of a particular nature ourselves. In this plane we do have the ability to create ourselves. We can go from what
we were born as to what we want to be and to grow into.
edit on 12-7-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)