It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Am I the only one who finds it odd that they are talking about dealing with child porn websites by trying to censor it at the receiving end rather than the sending end?
Originally posted by AusiAnarchist
Sure it's only the two largest ISPs in Australia, its only a weak implementation and it only filters out child porn websites, or so they tell us..
Originally posted by BalderAsir
I don't have an issue with internet censorship, if it means the child porn, terrorism etc based websites are blocked. What I do have an issue with is the government choosing what websites to block without making the criteria and list available in the public domain. It's a case or "trust us, we know whats best for you".
Senator Conroy has been on a personal crusade to push this through regardless of what the Australian public want.
Internet Censorship, Carbon Tax, the failed FuelWatch and GroceryWatch website, the MySchool debarcle, when will it end, when will the Australian public be allowed to remove these imbociles from Government?!
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Am I the only one who finds it odd that they are talking about dealing with child porn websites by trying to censor it at the receiving end rather than the sending end?
Originally posted by AusiAnarchist
Sure it's only the two largest ISPs in Australia, its only a weak implementation and it only filters out child porn websites, or so they tell us..
I thought just about every major country that assigns IP addresses has passed laws against child porn and that any child porn website worldwide could be shut down simply by reporting the site and having the provider take the website down, am I wrong?
So I must admit this whole censorship thing doesn't make much sense to me.
I had no idea there were 500 child porn sites online, is that true? If so, why don't we just shut them down at the source rather than setting up some kind of censorship? If we take the illegal sites down, then there shouldn't be any need to censor.
Well if that's the case, it sounds to me like someone doesn't know what CP is (not referring to you, but the idiots making the classifications).
Originally posted by MasterAndrew
Girls in bikinis isn't CP. But is classed as CP. how does that work?
Originally posted by ExCommando
Originally posted by AusiAnarchist
Telstra, Optus to start censoring the web next month.
News
(visit the link for the full news article)
MOST Australian internet users will have their web access censored next month after the country's two largest internet providers agreed to voluntarily block more than 500 websites from view.
The voluntary scheme was originally proposed by the Federal Government last year as part of a wider, $9.8 million scheme to encourage internet service providers to block all Refused Classification material from users as an optional service.
edit on 22-6-2011 by AusiAnarchist because: Autoscripting malfunction.
I, personally, have absolutely no problems with censorship on the net.
Take a look at another article on the news right now;
Terrorists find all their info online
Brief rundown - potential terrorists can find anything they want online.
So, as someone who doesn't look up kiddie porn or how to make bombs, why should this censorship bother me?
If it stops even a handful of people doing the wrong thing, then I'm all for it.
Same as heightened security at airports - 30 mins inconvenience, to stop a psycho with a gun is a price I will happily pay for my familys safety.
They want to convert the entire Internet into a commercial toy.
Originally posted by ExCommando
A homegrown terrorist, who has been indoctrinated in his home country (say the UK, or Australia), can join a chat room, and discuss the tactics to implement an attack; or they can browse a website and download a manual on how to make a bomb.