It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Essan
Unfortunately even if the material really was found in situ and really is 10.35k old, it cannot be accepted as evidence because no proper archaeological excavation has been carried out.
Just claiming you found something whilst digging around in the bedrock, close to the surface, is proof of absolutely nothing. Except perhaps the religious zeal of those involved in this scam.
There is no 'Bosnian pyramid.'
reply to post by Arken One bad thread after another. There is no 'Bosnian pyramid.' Why don't you post a few images of the 'pyramid' to illustrate your OP? Why no links to the research that supports the existence of 'Bosnian pyramids?' Is it because the 'pyramids' are natural hills? Osmanagic hasn't a leg to stand on in his claims of pyramids.
Unfortunately even if the material really was found in situ and really is 10.35k old, it cannot be accepted as evidence because no proper archaeological excavation has been carried out. Just claiming you found something whilst digging around in the bedrock, close to the surface, is proof of absolutely nothing. Except perhaps the religious zeal of those involved in this scam.
Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
It would seem to me that he was factually correct. There are no Bosnian Pyramids...only some "so called" pyramids that are actually natural structures....whether or not that is true, I suppose will be argued, but the fact remains...you tried to embarrassed him with an article that essentially backs up what he said....In other words the only one you embarrassed was yourself.
Geology level: it's been several times documented how ancient tribes used orographical accidents to build structures upon or through. Those could easily be pyramids-like mountains, covered with pathways and tunneled. But that doesnt' make them a pyramid at all and would be still far away from the engeneering complexity of erecting a pyramid.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
reply to post by Arken
One bad thread after another.
There is no 'Bosnian pyramid.'
Why don't you post a few images of the 'pyramid' to illustrate your OP? Why no links to the research that supports the existence of 'Bosnian pyramids?'
Is it because the 'pyramids' are natural hills? Osmanagic hasn't a leg to stand on in his claims of pyramids.
Originally posted by jimnuggits
Whole reputations, and by extention, institutions, would and could be discredited overnight.
Grant money goes to the most confident, not the most innovative.
No one with 'academic credentials' would think twice about refuting whatever 'Sam' finds, because the alternative, also known as real scientific enquiry, would spell the end to their meal ticket.
So, same with most other things, follow the money. It dirties all waters.
Originally posted by XtraTL
The church most certainly did not try to destroy evidence of past civilisations. You are horribly misinformed.