Al-Qaeda claims they have nuke in Europe.

Al-Qaeda say they already have a nuke in Europe some where. the said they would detonate it if osama was killed or captured. they said this on March 25, 2011

www.disinfo.com...

well he was killed yesterday, so what can we expect. Plus terrorist specialists on my local news (NYC news) say that there might be another attack a bigger one because of his death, in retaliation. Not to mention the cover up of something somewhere, is it the Canadian election, troops in libya, Israel attacking iran, missing prez of iran, blasting a dam in the Midwest, who knows what else. A lot of people on ATS say that their is confusion to the threads and chaos. if my thread cause confusion im srry, just trying to help here.

if this goes in news, srry put it there

Of course theres chaos i think the last thing anyone expected right now is to hear that we killed him.

oh no this is why that WE SHOULD HAVE NEVER KILLED HIM FOOLS IN WASHINGTON. We should keep killing them off until Bin Laden was the last one

I encourage you to not fall prey to terrorism.

Your fear is exactly what they want.

That's why they call it "terror"ism.

This underground war of cowards may never end.

Please go ahead and get on with your life.

For those of you who are past drug abusers: paranoia is a possible side-effect. Please take your meds.

Where is the headline "US has nuke in Al Qaeda?"

i dont think they are lying about the nukes.. they have ways of getting anything they want.
they get c4, machine guns, rpg, big ass guns and mortors . im posative they could get nukes..
i would guarantee that the retaliation is going to be the worst attack yet to date.
people are scared yes. i agree they should be. the al qaeda could attack anywhere and it will be devisstating.
they took down 3000 civilianze in 911 attacks so what you think a nuke will do

considering were bin laden was captured is a nuclear state, anything is possible.

at the bare minimum they could have acquired a large quantity of radioactive material to make a dirty bomb.

it makes sense that bin laden would order this after his death. if he detonated a nuke while he was alive, the u.s. wouldn't care where he was, they would have killed everything in their way to get him.

now that's he's dead, massive retaliation is not a problem.

what's bad is if his death was the code to activate all the sleepers cells around the world. very dangerous times right now.

What's those bumper stickers say?

Ain't Skeered !

Those cowardly bastards don't have the balls to stand up to ya and do anything. They have to creep around
like reptiles and blow crap up.

Sneak in, blow something up including yourself and hope you take lots with you - yeah that's bravery

It was strange that they killed him, as opposed to bringing him to trial, that way the public can rest assured that he was the man responsible.

Originally posted by SystemResistor
It was strange that they killed him, as opposed to bringing him to trial, that way the public can rest assured that he was the man responsible.

edit on 3-5-2011 by SystemResistor because: (no reason given)

Strange? How? It would have been stranger if he wasnt I think. Can you imagine all the kidnappings around the globe if they kept him alive?

Well, all I'm going to say is if they had a nuclear weapon, they'd probably have used it already.

BTW, yeah, they can get mortars, etc. on the black market, that stuff is EVERYWHERE in that area, but a nuke? Not as likely.

I have to say if they had a nuke they would have used it . Those things take more than a bit of skill they take training to use. If they had one they would have used it

reply to post by mwood


It doesn't matter whether you brave or not, they can do it... I don't call american fighter jets being brave either.

reply to post by SystemResistor


Or, his testimony might have made some people very uncomfortable. They definitely did nothing to quell the conspiracy theories by the way they did things. An assassination, then a quick burial at sea?

Maybe he was just lounging in a CIA safehouse and his handler came in and put two behind the ear because he was no longer useful.

And 5 people have just been arrested at one of our nuclear power plants according to bbc news

Al-Qaeda are using the same psychology that most of the world nuclear powers use, especially the USA and USSR during the Cold War.

Just the threat of a nuclear detotnation is usually enough to scare countries into submission and that is exactly what they are doing.... successfully.

Once the MAD detterent of the cold war was established - it was a stalemate for Soviet ambitions of world conquest - One of the obvious alternative strategies was then to somehow unattributably funnel nuclear weapons to a disposable proxy that hated the West just as much.


And there you have the Communist strategy of the last 60 yrs - they have ditched communism along the way in favour of State Socialism or Fascism and are most probably in bed with the Vatican/Jesuit/UN NWO

The other strategy they have followed is a full blown strategy of cultural/economic subversion leading to collapse.

Originally posted by Dinogur
Al-Qaeda say they already have a nuke in Europe some where. the said they would detonate it if osama was killed or captured. they said this on March 25, 2011

www.disinfo.com...

well he was killed yesterday, so what can we expect. Plus terrorist specialists on my local news (NYC news) say that there might be another attack a bigger one because of his death, in retaliation. Not to mention the cover up of something somewhere, is it the Canadian election, troops in libya, Israel attacking iran, missing prez of iran, blasting a dam in the Midwest, who knows what else. A lot of people on ATS say that their is confusion to the threads and chaos. if my thread cause confusion im srry, just trying to help here.

if this goes in news, srry put it there

edit on 2-5-2011 by Dinogur because: xtra

This is a threat we must all take very seriously. What I'm telling you is not classified. But I want our government to help us help ourselves in a WMD emergency. It's our right to do what we can for ourselves, after all in a major emergency us running around like beheaded chickens because we don't know whats "the best logical course of action" in a given situation, is insane. We the people ARE the government as said the founding Father's. They knew only an educated, informed populace could survive a crises. The government (officialdom) stocks potassium iodine since the early cold war, for radiation exposure. They should stockpile atropine as well. Its simple but uncomfortable but not so dangerous as to make it available "for emergency public dispense only". Naturally such stashes' are secret. But atropine should be their also, its cheap. Make your elected officials know. The more straight forward rational information the people have, the less the government has to fear what is the greatest fear they have, chaos. It may be counter intuitive for some but "the little people" deal with a crises far better with more "this is what you can do, theses are the pro's and cons. You have these options". Of course emphasize what is the best known action, and always KISS" But people love a selection, that empowers, and don't treat us like idiots. The more you know the greater chance people will do "THE BEST THING" Today we are drowning in "information" and in a crises the social media will spread the crazy stuff faster then you can say "ding dong, the bearded basterd is dead" Knowledge is more then power much more; its peace of mind. Some at least. So I want to cover some serious threats.

The technology for WMD and those with even a fair chemistry and bio-toxic knowledge (which includes knowledge of chemistry, (nerve agents, sarin , VX, etc); These agents are ultra-potent "chemical" weapons that are called acetyl-cholinesterous inhibitors. It prevents acetylcholine, a prime neurotransmitter from building up because your "nerve transmissions" overload if said stuff is not broken down after its down it's thing. Symptoms are everything from saliva, to tears, to sweat keep adding up till you drown or any number of things just can't take the signal overload. A bit like an electrical transformer shorts out when either it gets a one time "hard charge" of power, way above tolerance level (thats when transformers explode), or gets way to much, but to much juice, over time for the wires etc to overheat and burn. A nerve agent can be "arrested" by atropine (the most common antidote) Thats how you treat nerve gas exposure, one reason our troops get atropine auto-injector's You jab the sucker looking like a pre-loaded insulin pen and a harpoon, that they call a needle, and can penetrate right threw heavy clothing or an NBC suit.

Nerve agents ARE NOT infectious, but if someone has a pin drop on clothing and you touch it, you got trouble. Then "bioweapon's with pandemic potential" like bubonic plague or anthrax. This is an infectious or transmittable agent,ALL ARE HIGHY INFECTIOUS. One usually gets going via a "vector" ( a caring agent or creature, like a rat, which is like an , ok is an infection (sometimes called "bacteriological agent's like plague that uses a mouse for example as an "incubator" ). Plague must "incubate" in a host animal, how it does so from start to finish is not well understood. Anthrax is much simpler to manufacture and disseminate. Simple chemical "weapons" can be certain common industrial chemicals like chlorine or hydrofluoric acid. One is common the other not, but this is critical. Stuff like chlorine will hurt only those directly exposed (can include clothing, hair for some chemical's, but thats kind of rare, but not unheard of). Infectious decease or radiological let alone "nuclear weapons" expert could make, no sweat. You have chemical agents ("mustard gas"), nerve agents "sarin, VX," which are in fact a form of chemical weapon, and biological weapon like anthrax.

It is very possible they have radio-nucleotides and that can make a "dirty bomb". Radiation is not "infectious" but exposure hazard depends on how close you are to the source, and that can be a contaminated person, clothing, hair, etc. These are important distinctions… Also it's quite easy to design and make an assortment of chemical weapon's, like sarin used by Omshoun-rekio (sorry abbot the bad spelling) cult that struck the Tokyo subway in the 1990s' and it seems highly likely. A biological weapon would be like weaponized anthrax, and the Russians made astonishing amounts and designed missile warheads to carry it as we did no doubt, at least we stopped making bio (moor accurately biological A regular high explosive, a powerful version in fact a one close to a "smallest nuke", minus the radiation, is called a "fueled air munition" or "Daisy Cutter" we used a modest one to take out one of OSB's designer caves. They create a rapid localized vacuum, blowing the lungs apart of anyone to close. Usually an aerosol is detonated above a target and instant airport (no trees buildings etc left)

As "Dear leader" the godhead of North Korea was said to have the largest collection of porn movie's, skin rags, et el. ON EARTH (serious), and since the bearded bastard used a girl as a human shield when killed maybe the 2nd biggest porn, and assorted party favors or "toys from beasts are us"; what you can't just walk in to Harrods getting it off the rack, even Harrods can't place some "special orders") Even their connections in the marketplace won't get you the (real) "Holy Grail") l who knows maybe he had a fetish for Gizu knives, torture flicks, (Hitler had as well as his cronies a fetish for torture flicks some would have made Anastasia sick that according to what G2 got a hold at the war's end got a a hard on from that who the f*** cares ) How bout this for a threat... Think back to the "old days" when most people thought of an "attack by the Soviet Union apron the United States and NATO could be tracked by missile launch detection, or by the nuclear material signature. We would know soon enough if hit by a missal, or a "suitcase nuke". That means we can likely track it to its source. Any nuclear device we can source, we can target and destroy them. And believe me brother we will. Deterrence kept the peace over 60 years.

We need to make it REAL GOD DANM CLEAR: If a person or group we link to a radical Islamic sect hits us, we target Mecca and Medina. Any nuclear explosion in any western city we would likely "tag" the weapon by it's structural signature. All nuclear material and specifically the uranium ore (which would be likely, but not assured. This is at least a bargaining starting point to get every "peaceful Muslim" off their complacent ass. If you don't have an army or city to hit, know this: We can and will destroy what you hold most dear. Now its up to Muslims to point out the terrorists and let us deal with them. If you really do give a tinkers damn about whist you profess.

reply to post by Dinogur

In UK just watching Sky News and the British Asians arrested near Sellafield were actually taking photographs of the plant there ? May not be connected but makes me wonder what these various 'cells' are up to in view of the statement you have quoted. I reckon even Pakistan will be paying the price as said by Imran Khan in his latest radoi interview on Sky. What do others think?