It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Watts
It may take us longer than other countries to go into rebel mode but when we do.... oh boy its gonna be ugly.
Originally posted by airspoon
reply to post by Watts
Originally posted by Watts
It may take us longer than other countries to go into rebel mode but when we do.... oh boy its gonna be ugly.
When? After we will have given up every tool with which to fight back? By then, it will be far too late, if it isn't already. Our founding fathers gave us the [Constitutional] rights and liberties to fight back these kind of influences, though sadly, we are doing nothing as they are being either eroded or eliminated all together.
Take the Second Amendment for instance. The right to bear arms has been eroded so much, that it is now pretty much pointless. We now have to get permission from the government, to arm ourselves to keep that same government in check. Yet still, we aren't allowed to arm ourselves in a manner that makes us competitive, thus effective.
Then we can look at the First Amendment. We now have to get permission from the government to assemble against and/or protest that very same government. Even still, this permission is either out-right denied, or diminished to the point of non-effectiveness (free-speech zones).
Then we can look at the Tenth Amendment, which is ignored all together. I can literally go on and on, though I digress. You get the point.
--airspoon
--airspoon
Originally posted by airspoon
reply to post by Wildbob77
I actually agree with you, to an extent. The vast majority of class-action suits due benefit the lawyers the most, sometimes only the lawyers, though only monetarily. However, not all suits are focused solely on monetary value. For a single instance, Class Action suits have good punitive value to bring about valuable change in whatever conduct was is the focus of the litigation. When you touch a hot stove, you burn your finger. Now we have given the corporations heat resistant gloves so they may man-handle the stove all they want.
--airspoon
edit on 28-4-2011 by airspoon because: (no reason given)
Iknow its tempting to go there, but I strongly suspect that is what they want. Any physical uprising would be an excuse to suspend the Constitution and declare martial law. Which is what they want. They want people in the US (much like has been orchestrated in the Mid East) to be the ones to topple their own protective system of government.
Our government has been infiltrated by treasonous scum, but the solution is not to overturn the government. It is to use the very tools put in place BY the treasonous scum to remove them from office. We are walking a very fine line. But the strategy of using their own weapons designed for us against them is a safer bet than outright revolt. We are not just against a group of corporations and politician in the US, we are at war, economically, with a multinational economic mafia which has been perfecting its technique of using propaganda, election rigging, and the illusion of uprising around the world for years.
We need to do something, but we need to make very sure we are on the side of the law. While we still have law.
Originally posted by airspoon
reply to post by ViperChili
Even if people were to read and understand the "fine-print", there isn't much that can be done about it. It isn't like you are allowed to interject your own terms into the contract and consumer/employee/contractee choice is now eliminated in most cases due to an atmosphere of government favoritism. We are no longer in a position to argue our terms for the contract, yet we are forced into these contracts in many cases.
--airspoon