It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whaaa
Debt? Money?
Not really, because it's just one's and zero's in a data bank somewhere. It means nothing more than just a neocon method of keeping score.
“The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure,” he said on March 16, 2006. “Leadership means that ‘the buck stops here.’ Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership . Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit.”
Originally posted by Ferris.Bueller.II
Well, not being partisan, even the President was against raising the debt ceiling limit when he was a 'seasoned' Senator, of course this was before he was for raising it as President. Seeing as he was a lot more 'loved' as Senator, we should listen to his words on this issue from then:
“The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure,” he said on March 16, 2006. “Leadership means that ‘the buck stops here.’ Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership . Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit.”
Source.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by whaaa
Debt? Money?
Not really, because it's just one's and zero's in a data bank somewhere. It means nothing more than just a neocon method of keeping score.
I provide food and shelter for my family with those ones and zeros.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by whaaa
You're typing that on a pie in the sky, supply and demand, capitalist dream.
Keep on enjoying those handouts, then.
Originally posted by Skewed
Just fire up the printing presses again. That always works.
Honestly though, for the most part, if the economy crashes I think it will be the wealthy people suffering more than the average broke person such as myself. I am used to not having enough money, so what I never had I can never miss. Those able to adapt to the situation and ones that do not always rely on money to get them out of situations will be the true winners of that and I welcome the day when some bank executives find themselves suffering because that safe full useless paper is all they have.
Originally posted by beezzer
Senator Obama must be a racist for criticizing President Obama.edit on 26-4-2011 by beezzer because: Solar flares
Originally posted by Ferris.Bueller.II
Originally posted by beezzer
Senator Obama must be a racist for criticizing President Obama.edit on 26-4-2011 by beezzer because: Solar flares
I wonder if Senator Obama would approve of President Obama's decisions?
Originally posted by beezzer
There's another thread here about solar flares blowing us back 100 years.
I read that and thought, "And it's a bad thing?"
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Skewed
If the economy does crash, then it'd bring down most of the free world with it. Basically leveling the playing field for everyone again.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Skewed
Elitists would suffer the worst. How many of the elite know how to field dress a deer? Plant a garden? Make their own ammo?