It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Alex Jones - We're winning!

page: 1

log in


posted on Apr, 23 2011 @ 07:10 AM

I thought this was a pretty great couple of videos from Alex Jones on how the NWO is behind schedule and we are waking up well before they were expecting us to, years before their plans have been fully implemented where if we did wake up they could crush us immediately without any hesitation. Looks like the people may be one step ahead of them this time.

I have a theory and I just want you folks to hear me out. My theory is that they sneak in their NWO plans in giant leaps when they try and radically change the global structure. First they put in the Federal Reserve here in the US then launched WWI when that war ended something shocked them, the Isolationist streak that America had held for 130 years was still strong and they got enough votes to keep the League of Nations bill from passing the Congress, thus their first attempt at World Order failed.

They tried again just over a decade later, this time they were determined to make it work. They crashed the stock market and brought on the Great Depression and a huge debt to all Western nations along with the largest expansion of the US federal government in history. They kept the Great Depression going and brought people onto the government payroll and into the welfare lines so we become dependent on them, the state. So they then launched a war in Europe, WWII, the most horrible war in human history. They knew that after a global depression, the fear of communism and fascism, and the worst war the world has ever seen that they could finally bring in their World Order. And they were right.

At that time we got the United Nations and Bretton Woods system, the Bretton Woods meeting was actually held before the end of the war and one of its leading members was a devout Soviet communist. The UN was their first step towards world governance. Then the endless wars began; Korea, Vietnam, Balkans, Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Libya. That along with countless coups and skirmishes, all of that just to fight a threat they created at the end of WWI.

Now we are at a point in history where they want the next great leap forward, where their plans of formal world governance are finally realized. The UN and all the supranational entities; WTO, NATO, GATT, WHO, WWF, EU, etc… are all just the foundation and now they want to finally finish the house they have been building.

Only problem for them right now is the fact that they are running behind schedule and we are waking up early. Who here in their lifetime ever thought that people would hate both parties like they do now? That people would question the Federal Reserve like they do now? That they would believe in ‘conspiracy theories’ like they do now? That you would ever have any popular news sources actually telling the truth like they do now? Things have changed and people are more awake than ever before, the only question which remains now is whether we can keep them awake and finally get them to rise up before it’s too late and they take us for the next big leap.

These are two more great videos of an interview with the long-time Bilderberg chaser, Jim Tucker.
edit on 4/23/2011 by Misoir because: (no reason given)

posted on Apr, 23 2011 @ 07:40 AM
reply to post by Misoir

What you're describing by leaping ahead during time of crisis is due to the Overton Window.

However, Alex Jones is misguided, if he thinks that the World Government is behind by any means.

Nothing against you Misoir but listening to Jones will rot the brain and I like you a lot.

He, Alex Jones, is nothing more than an opportunist, taking advantage of a built-in hate system.

Those who hate Government are his targeted audience, those who hate the corruption, and those willing to listen to and follow him without questioning his motives wholly, meanwhile he is more than likely an Agent Provocateur himself, with a mission to gather as many people too stupid to lead themselves, so as to make those people mislead themselves by listening to others without thinking.

Let me break it down for you.

Quote from : Wikipedia : Overton Window

The Overton window, in political theory, describes a "window" in the range of public reactions to ideas in public discourse, in a spectrum of all possible options on a particular issue.

It is named after its originator, Joseph P. Overton, former vice president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.


At any given moment, the “window” includes a range of policies considered to be politically acceptable in the current climate of public opinion, which a politician can recommend without being considered too “extreme” or outside the mainstream to gain or keep public office.

Overton arranged the spectrum on a vertical axis of “more free” and “less free” in regards to government intervention.

When the window moves or expands, ideas can accordingly become more or less politically acceptable.

The degrees of acceptance of public ideas can be described roughly as:







The Overton Window is a means of visualizing which ideas define that range of acceptance by where they fall in it.

Proponents of policies outside the window seek to persuade or educate the public so that the window either “moves” or expands to encompass them. Opponents of current policies, or similar ones currently within the window, likewise seek to convince people that these should be considered unacceptable.

Other formulations of the process created after Overton's death add the concept of moving the window, such as deliberately promoting ideas even less acceptable than the previous "outer fringe" ideas, with the intention of making the current fringe ideas acceptable by comparison (This might be a form of the “Door-in-the-face technique" of persuasion.)

Glenn Beck has a book by the very same title but he stole the concept wholly just as Overon did.

Quote from : Wikipedia : Dialectic : Hegelian Dialectic

Hegelian dialectic, usually presented in a threefold manner, was stated by Heinrich Moritz Chalybäus as comprising three dialectical stages of development: a thesis, giving rise to its reaction, an antithesis, which contradicts or negates the thesis, and the tension between the two being resolved by means of a synthesis.

Although this model is often named after Hegel, he himself never used that specific formulation. Hegel ascribed that terminology to Kant.

Carrying on Kant's work, Fichte greatly elaborated on the synthesis model, and popularized it.

On the other hand, Hegel did use a three-valued logical model that is very similar to the antithesis model, but Hegel's most usual terms were:


Sometimes Hegel would use the terms, Immediate-Mediated-Concrete.

Hegel used these terms hundreds of times throughout his works.

The formula, Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis, does not explain why the Thesis requires an Antithesis.

However, the formula, Abstract-Negative-Concrete, suggests a flaw in any initial thesis—it is too abstract and lacks the negative of trial, error and experience.

The same applies to the formula, Immediate-Mediated-Concrete.

For Hegel, the Concrete, the Synthesis, the Absolute, must always pass through the phase of the Negative, that is, Mediation.

This is the actual essence of what is popularly called Hegelian Dialectics.

Bolded and underlined by SKL.

Herein lies the rub as the bard tells us though.

The Hegelian Dialectic

There is no such thing as the New World Order and never has been.

It is a machination, a game, a long-term con if you will.

And we create it by perpuating this lie each time we tell it.

The Boy Who Cried N.W.O. : Are You Watching Puppet or Puppet Master's?

The "New World Order" is nothing more than a propaganda game played by World Government.

It is a game using Chinese Whispers to create our very own fear as our prison cell.

If we "play the game" they win, meaning World Government, and it is created through our fears.

Quote from : Wikipedia : Chinese Whispers

In the game variously known as Chinese whispers, Telephone, Grapevine, Broken Telephone, Whisper Down the Lane, Gossip, Le téléphone arabe (French for "Arab Phone"), Stille Post (German for "Silent Post"), Gioco del Telefono (Italian for "Telephone Game"), Telefono senza fili (Italian for "Cordless Phone"), Telefone sem fio (Portuguese for "Cordless Phone"), Głuchy Telefon (Polish for "Dumb Telephone") and Pass the Message, the first player whispers a phrase or sentence to the next player.

Each player successively whispers what that player believes he or she heard to the next.

The last player announces the statement to the entire group.

Errors typically accumulate in the retellings, so the statement announced by the last player differs significantly, and often amusingly, from the one uttered by the first.

The game is often played by children as a party game or in the playground.

It is often invoked as a metaphor for cumulative error, especially the inaccuracies as rumours or gossip spread, or, more generally, for the unreliability of human recollection.

In the United States, "Telephone" is the most common name for the game.

The name "Chinese whispers" reflects the former stereotype in Europe of the Chinese language as being incomprehensible.

It is little-used in the United States and may be considered offensive.

However, it remains the common British English name for the game.

And we need to stop it and use a different tact to win by not playing to begin with.

Chinese Whispers

This is merely telling you things I know you know already though.

Fifth Column Movement : The United Nations, Your Country, and Defending Your Rights...

We as a community have to wake the Hell up though and quit "playing the game" in order to win.

Mission Creep : Agenda of An Alleged "New World Order" and Those Doing Their Bidding [WRAP]

I won the above writing contest having the most convincing "What Really Amps People" story of my life.

I am by no means trying to gain followers or notoriety though by telling you this information.

It is just a way to make people open their eyes to the problem which is not leading themselves.

As well as people needing to realize they do not need other people to follow them either.

The conspiracy theory community could win if they stopped playing the game.

The conspiracy theory community could win if they stopped talk of violence and or guns.

The conspiracy theory community could win if they stopped talk of defending organizations like Wikileaks.

But alas too many people are far too lazy to do the right thing by supporting the wrong thing.

Other people with less than intelligent means through mindless barbarian tactics.

And falling into the vert trap which creates their prison cells.
edit on 4/23/11 by SpartanKingLeonidas because: Adding Depth and Insight Into the Post.

posted on Apr, 23 2011 @ 07:47 AM
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas

"We are not to expect to be translated from despotism to liberty in a feather-bed." Thomas Jefferson

Sorry, but anyone who expects we will be delivered from this system in any other way is misled.
It's the dream, but unfortunately that's all it ever will be. You cannot win by not playing the game.
You can start there, but if that's only the beginning of the path to liberty.
edit on 23-4-2011 by Tephra because: (no reason given)

posted on Apr, 23 2011 @ 07:48 AM
Dangerous message. By saying "We're winning!", some could abandon the fight before the actual victory which would then become a defeat.

posted on Apr, 23 2011 @ 11:00 AM
i agree that is very dangerous and irresponsible.

that is giving everybody false hope so that we drop our guard.
we are not winning and they are not behind, but they are making mistakes.
these people are psychopaths who are hell bent in thinking without us this world would be paradise.

posted on Apr, 23 2011 @ 07:50 PM
Looking around on the streets and the scene of the degrading blue collar and middle class dreams, I don't think it's easy to see that we, the people are winning.

The tax and hate us, poison and taze us; keep us hating eachother and locked in a mainstream daze.

If you look around and see the cathedrals of today are the towering skyscrapers of corporatism and the new brand of despotism, with bailouts to financial flunkies and the CIA making millions of junkies to divide and conquer and fear monger...

We're winning? We're in the clear? It's all good now cuz AJ said so and got Jim Tucker to back up his motto? Bravado imho.

B Woods II, soros plotting against you, bilderberg group in secret rooms killing america and designing the NAU.

They're phasing us out and there's no doubt that their plan is in motion and the feel they're on track with no way back....

We're not winning, most of us don't even know there's a game...


posted on Apr, 23 2011 @ 07:56 PM
Problem with the NWO is that they are probably just about dead now aren't they? Unless they pass it on to their eldest son or something.

Also the people have hated the government far worse at times than they do today and there has always been conspiracy's going around. Heck the entire republican party disappeared for awhile because people hated it so much.

Alot of your historical points simply don't add up. There is no possible way NWO could have engineered the great depression or the stock market crash of '29 as that was simply a consumer problem. Unless they told everyone in the nation to overextend by buying on credit they couldn't have affected it.

I highly doubt they created the enormous weather problems affecting the globe at that time either that also added to the depression.

Just a bit of common sense goes a long way.

posted on Apr, 23 2011 @ 08:00 PM
Yeah, they're winning all right. Both Alex Jones and Charlie Sheen, that is. I'll bet that people are waiting in line to join that team of Winners.

posted on Apr, 23 2011 @ 08:05 PM

Originally posted by Tephra
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas

"We are not to expect to be translated from despotism to liberty in a feather-bed." Thomas Jefferson

Sorry, but anyone who expects we will be delivered from this system in any other way is misled.
It's the dream, but unfortunately that's all it ever will be. You cannot win by not playing the game.
You can start there, but if that's only the beginning of the path to liberty.
edit on 23-4-2011 by Tephra because: (no reason given)

Of course not.

But we cannot expect to "be delivered" by guns and violence either.

There is far too much planning, laws, and our tax money on the side of Government.

Once we, a collective conspiracy theory community, stop "playing the game" we win.

I have defeated the New World Order even if it is only in my mind.

Even if the Liberty Tree occasionally needs blood to grow let us not waste lives unnecessarily.

posted on Apr, 23 2011 @ 08:37 PM
Alex, unfortunately is deluded!
He not only believes the elite can be defeated but that he is winning?
He is but a puppet of the elite and doesnt even know it.
Alex only knows what they allow him to know and exists because they allow it,
any genuine threat to their evil plan has and will be eliminated.
Unfortunately it is too late, they have already won.

posted on Apr, 24 2011 @ 06:15 AM
the most haunting thing is what bush said about the nwo.
he says " we have a real chance for bringing in this nwo in our lifetime and we will"
people like him are the psychopathic danger to world security.
he is old and wrinkly like the others and wants recognition from his forefathers that he was one of those who made their plan work.
but because he is blinded by this he doesnt see that our creator is watching their ever move and he is so sad at what they are doing to their people and the earth, and gods plan is that we will get together so that these people fail.

top topics


log in