It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We’re going to call forth the sun!” Rep. Keith Ellison, the Minnesota Democrat who is co-chair of the caucus, proclaimed theatrically. His colleagues huddled under umbrellas and the wind knocked their promotional poster from its easel.
Ellison and the progressives probably would have a better chance of influencing the weather than they would passing their budget, which they are floating as an alternative to the House Republican bid and President Obama’s plan.
Among the highlights: A $4 trillion tax increase over 10 years. An increase in the top tax rate to 49 percent. A $2.3 trillion cut in defense spending – and an increase in domestic spending. Oh, and they would revive the “public option” to offer government-run health care.
Even the most starry-eyed of the progressives know the proposal is as much of a non-starter as Paul Ryan’s House Republican plan, which requires only spending cuts and actually reduces taxes. The real target is President Obama, who the progressives fear will capitulate and negotiate a deal that cuts heavily into entitlements and social programs.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by centurion1211
If progressives were in charge of the ocean instead of our money, they'd run out of water.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by centurion1211
If progressives were in charge of the ocean instead of our money, they'd run out of water.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by centurion1211
If progressives were in charge of the ocean instead of our money, they'd run out of water.
Or try and tax us for the use of water AND air.
Originally posted by Janky Red
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by centurion1211
If progressives were in charge of the ocean instead of our money, they'd run out of water.
Or try and tax us for the use of water AND air.
Or how about buy all the water rights in the US like the KOCH brother intend to do
Just like they do in third world nations to control the populace
Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Texas) suggested a more militaristic form of resistance. “We are the soldiers on the battlefield. We wear the armor of the People’s Budget,” she announced. She predicted that if the Republican budget becomes law, seniors in nursing homes “will be lifted out in stretchers and you’ll see them carried out one by one.”
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) announced that 30 members of Congress were fasting on Wednesday to “raise the level of awareness about the People’s Budget.” (A separate press conference highlighting the fast was called off; it was unclear whether this was because of rain, hunger or something else.) Text
Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.), the Progressive Caucus co-chair, who convened the session wearing a tie that hung loose from his neck and ended five inches above his waistband..
The Progressive Caucus will win that argument, just as soon as they gain control of the weather. The drizzle, alas, did not let up
Originally posted by Janky Red
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by centurion1211
If progressives were in charge of the ocean instead of our money, they'd run out of water.
Or try and tax us for the use of water AND air.
Or how about buy all the water rights in the US like the KOCH brother intend to do
Just like they do in third world nations to control the populace
Originally posted by centurion1211
reply to post by guohua
Oh, and where have we heard the phrase, "the People's ...." this and "the People's .." that before?
wait for it ...
Straight out of marxist-leninist communism - as in the People's Republic of < fill in the blank >.
The progessives are gertting so desperate they aren't even trying to hide their agenda any more ...
edit on 4/14/2011 by centurion1211 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by simone50m
It's not left vs. right so much as it's pro big government vs pro small government.
The real divisivness is who do you want to take care of you?
Yourself?
Or
Big government?
Choose one over the other and all debate becomes moot.