It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
reply to post by byteshertz
You are adding random possibilities like "how do we even know this is not a dream?" to add to the complexity of the question "is there a god" for no reason at all.
Lets do this with a simple question.
Q: Did you put ketchup on my hot dog last night ?
A: Yes, indeed I did.
Q: Were you in in the factory when the ketchup was bottled ?
A ...
Q : Well that could have been a new unknown type of mustard that taste and looks just like ketchup !
A: ffffuuuuuuuuu
Q :Check and mate !
You can make any question too complex to answer by adding possibilities and assumptions.
edit on 7-3-2011 by LikeDuhObviously because: spelling
Originally posted by byteshertz
It's not about wanting there to be more it's about realising there probably is more but we are unable to see beyond our limits.
Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
Originally posted by byteshertz
It's not about wanting there to be more it's about realising there probably is more but we are unable to see beyond our limits.
Justify this statement, Please.
How do you come to this conclusion ? It is very apparent you are talking out of your ass when you speak on what is known about how life began and the diversity of life. We fully understand that magic is not needed to create life.
All you are trying to say is science cannot answer everything, so it is just as valid as "God did it". While completely ignoring everything science can and does explain.
Please explain how there is "probably" more then what will ever be in the reach of the scientific method.
I got a invisible pink unicorn is my basement and you cannot prove I don't.
I may have never seen this unicorn but I know it is pink and has a blue tail. I can attach all the empty claims I want to my unicorn. Because you cannot disprove it.
You really do not see a huge logical failure with this statement ?
Your next post is a reply to me what is the same tired old crap.
You do how ever use the word "biblically" ... do you really want me to point out retiredness in the bible and compare it to known science ? If you want to say "God" used abiogenesis, evolution, the big bang, etc. as tools to create the known universe, go ahead. If you want to put the "unknown and unprovable" on the same ground as known fact proven way of the scientific method you belong in the bronze ages. Grow up.
You are doing one of two things.
1. You are ignorant to how much science knows and has shown on these subject.
2. You are just another lying creationist.
Reality Check !
You have yet to try to explain how God, magic, unicorns, etc is even remotely plausible let alone probable.
The science is above, and it agree's with what I say. But as pointed out science can not go beyond this reality - mathmatics may be able to - but so far science shows this is probable. There is answers that come come from other places besides science.
Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
What I do know is you are still trying to put god on the same level as real science. Yet still have not took the time to actually explain why your god is "probable" or even plausible. You see quantum mechanics is testable (we observe the results!). Now stop trying to compare SCIENCE with your god, without showing how god is testable !
(kind of a important part of ... you know ... science)
I already said you can tell the world your god uses the known science as a tool. But you cannot say your god is as valid as said sciences without proving it or at least showing how we can show "God".
In before pics of burnt toast that looks like jesus ?
OT: I always found it funny that these miracles always happen on white bread instead of the more historically correct whole wheat.
I make a post saying science and religion both know nothing in the grand scheme and you come back with talking about my "God" - Where have I said anywhere in this thread that I have a God, or that I believe in one? And please quote me!!
They don't - yet all science is based off the assumption that this is reality. Because science measures THIS reality - show me how we could measure an alternate reality using this reality.
Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
reply to post by byteshertz
You completely ignore my point that your "alternate reality" is some untestable bullcrap.
Jesus man, you are using this "alternate reality" to put things like ... lets say a deity out of reach of science !
Originally posted by byteshertz
FAR FROM SCIENCE FICTION OR "BULLCRAP"
- Again, and for the last time I ask do you have any sources supporting your view.
Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
Originally posted by byteshertz
FAR FROM SCIENCE FICTION OR "BULLCRAP"
- Again, and for the last time I ask do you have any sources supporting your view.
Parallel universes ARE FAR FROM FACT OR EVEN A THEORY!
Originally posted by colin42
About dreams.
A week ago I was in dreaming, more importantly I was aware I was dreaming. I have read enough now to know not to push things when in this state so went along with it and remember having a great time (around a day).
When I woke I was so excited I got out of bed and was going to tell the wife about it. I don’t know how or why but I again became aware this was just another dream. Spooky but again went along for the ride and again had a great time.
When I woke for the third time the thought struck me. What if I was/am still dreaming it’s just this time I cannot recognise it?
I don’t remember being born, hey I find it hard to recall much of anything so I cannot be sure as so much of life goes the same way as dreams work.
So yeah I get the OP’s point and his conclusions
S&F
Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
Your sources are the BBC and Fox news.
Just because a multi-verse gains ground does not mean parallel universes do. If you just mean multi-verse why not just call it that ? Why did you not say this in your OP ? Instead of being so cryptic ?
You have a few people with a hypothesis .. THAT IS IT.
NASA Find new planet in our Solar system !
Remember this story that ran as if there was solid proof of an unknown planet ?
No bull# there is no actual proof for a distant unknown plant in our solar system.
There is now a decent hypnosis put together, but # all has been proven yet.
Remember this NASA Press release ?
“An astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life”
The media was ALL over this. But as soon as anyone who actually read the papers, were like .. WTF so what ?
The media .. still ate that # up.
The meteorite with microbial life trapped inside meteorites . . .. As old as the solar system .. ?
Maybe just maybe you and others (including the people writing some of the papers) are getting a little ahead of yourself ?edit on 8-3-2011 by LikeDuhObviously because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LikeDuhObviously
How about a actual scientific paper ?
You know what forget about it.
edit on 8-3-2011 by LikeDuhObviously because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by byteshertz
God, the multiverse, and everything: modern cosmology and the argument from design -
By Rodney D. Holder