It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Creationists New Tactics
The Scopes Strategy: Creationists Try New Tactics to Promote Anti-Evolutionary Teaching in Public Schools Under the guise of "academic freedom" creationists are co-opting some old heroes of the fight to teach evolution in the classroom for their anti-science campaign
Darwinian evolution should be questioned, primarily because darwinian evolution is entirely incorrect on how the process of evolution occurs. I love science being taught in classrooms, but having seen it first hand, I find it utterly insane how Darwin's Theories, yes theories are being taught as fact. Evolution is a fact of our existence, but Darwin's angle on it, should not be taught as fact.
It is a theory not a scientific fact .Still the real question is how did life begin with DNA or RNA not being a natural or random occurring thing much less a living cell to host it . All cells have DNA and this situation does not occur on it's own .
The Bible is the oldest information that tells us that there is a God and he created life here .
such as the Nanobot scheme and the two that claimed to have found the missing link .
Yes someone needs to present the other side
Originally posted by Tephra
Darwinian evolution should be questioned ...
... primarily because darwinian evolution is entirely incorrect on how the process of evolution occurs.
In the early 20th century, Darwinian theories of evolution were combined with genetics, palaeontology, and systematics, which culminated into a union of ideas known as the modern evolutionary synthesis.
I love science being taught in classrooms, but having seen it first hand, I find it utterly insane how Darwin's Theories, yes theories are being taught as fact. Evolution is a fact of our existence, but Darwin's angle on it, should not be taught as fact.
Originally posted by SimonPeter
For anyone that actually weighs the global movements to a One World Government and One World Money unity and weighs what the Bible prophesied 2,000 years ago , creationism is the only way .
It is a labor of love and sometimes a burden to present the Word of God and the creation of life by the living God .
The theory of evolution has many holes in it .
It is a theory not a scientific fact .
The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence. Many scientific theories are so well established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics). One of the most useful properties of scientific theories is that they can be used to make predictions about natural events or phenomena that have not yet been observed.
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world. The theory of biological evolution is more than "just a theory." It is as factual an explanation of the universe as the atomic theory of matter or the germ theory of disease. Our understanding of gravity is still a work in progress. But the phenomenon of gravity, like evolution, is an accepted fact.
Still the real question is how did life begin with DNA or RNA not being a natural or random occurring thing much less a living cell to host it . All cells have DNA and this situation does not occur on it's own . Evolution only occurs where there is first life . As the earth formed from superheated rock would have no living life forms on it , and the extremes of deep space would exclude life as we know it how did life begin ?
The Bible is the oldest information that tells us that there is a God and he created life here .
Of course man as an adolesent that we are , know it all , then tries to make assumptions and back engineer life creation to suit our own vanity .
Some scientist have been caught making claims that are false such as the Nanobot scheme and the two that claimed to have found the missing link . Then there are those that makes bold statements and when challenged throws a couple of hundred million years in for good luck .
Yes someone needs to present the other side .
Originally posted by SimonPeter
It is a theory not a scientific fact .
Originally posted by muse7
The one question I have is, why are we still calling Evolution a theory and not a fact?
Human DNA and Chimp DNA are 95% the same, that alone should cement Evolution as a FACT.