It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by Phage
You have no proof that the contrail powder is for aerial target practice
SUMMARY
The present invention is for a powder generator requiring no heat source to emit a "contrail" with sufficient visibility to aid in visual acquisition of an aircraft target vehicle and the like.
and you have no proof that it can't used for other purposes.
The present invention is also suitable for use in other aircraft vehicles to generate contrails or reflective screens for any desired purpose.
All of you have previously said that all contrails are all normal and putting powder or other particles would mess up the engine. Now who's the one really lying?
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by Phage
So then you admit they are spraying contrail powder ? In all your previous comments you say there is no proof they spray anything. Now once again your story changes to suit your position.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Thank you, you have just proved my point.
They spray this contrail powder for other purposes. One of them being for it's reflective properties. Case closed.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Actually with all your double talk and lies
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
You have no evidence that I have seen so far that shows commercial airlines making persistent contrails.
You also seem to think that the equipment isn't easily installed and removed within a very short period.
Your statement means nothing and proves nothing.
You have no proof that the contrail powder is for aerial target practice and you have no proof that it can't used for other purposes. All of you have previously said that all contrails are all normal and putting powder or other particles would mess up the engine. Now who's the one really lying?
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
It's called reverse psychology and it worked like a charm. I knew you couldn't resist trying to prove me wrong even if it meant proving yourself and your crew wrong in the process.
Thanks, keep up the good work.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
I love how you keep mentioning civil aviation. What about military aviation.
You're exposing more and more of your lies
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
How about you explain why you're all using patents to try and prove something when before you all said that patents prove nothing?
Actually I already have all that information and I read it a long time ago. I have it included with all the other documents I keep stored in a folder available online.
How about you explain why you're all using patents to try and prove something when before you all said that patents prove nothing?